Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Advertisements

A Sensorimotor Role for Traveling Waves in Primate Visual Cortex
Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Ji Dai, Daniel I. Brooks, David L. Sheinberg  Current Biology 
Chenguang Zheng, Kevin Wood Bieri, Yi-Tse Hsiao, Laura Lee Colgin 
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Martin O'Neill, Wolfram Schultz  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Attention-Induced Variance and Noise Correlation Reduction in Macaque V1 Is Mediated by NMDA Receptors  Jose L. Herrero, Marc A. Gieselmann, Mehdi Sanayei,
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Complementary Roles for Primate Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Guarding Working Memory from Distractor Stimuli  Simon Nikolas Jacob, Andreas Nieder  Neuron 
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
Activity in Posterior Parietal Cortex Is Correlated with the Relative Subjective Desirability of Action  Michael C. Dorris, Paul W. Glimcher  Neuron 
Cascaded Effects of Spatial Adaptation in the Early Visual System
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Attentional Modulations Related to Spatial Gating but Not to Allocation of Limited Resources in Primate V1  Yuzhi Chen, Eyal Seidemann  Neuron  Volume.
Responses of Collicular Fixation Neurons to Gaze Shift Perturbations in Head- Unrestrained Monkey Reveal Gaze Feedback Control  Woo Young Choi, Daniel.
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Learning to Link Visual Contours
Nicolas Catz, Peter W. Dicke, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Pieter R. Roelfsema, Henk Spekreijse  Neuron 
Adaptation Disrupts Motion Integration in the Primate Dorsal Stream
Huihui Zhou, Robert Desimone  Neuron 
Liu D. Liu, Christopher C. Pack  Neuron 
Neural Correlates of Reaching Decisions in Dorsal Premotor Cortex: Specification of Multiple Direction Choices and Final Selection of Action  Paul Cisek,
Action Selection and Action Value in Frontal-Striatal Circuits
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Independent Category and Spatial Encoding in Parietal Cortex
Prefrontal Cortex Activity Related to Abstract Response Strategies
Feature-based attention in visual cortex
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Eye Movement Preparation Modulates Neuronal Responses in Area V4 When Dissociated from Attentional Demands  Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Tirin Moore  Neuron 
Ryo Sasaki, Takanori Uka  Neuron  Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations  Timothy J.
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Georgia G. Gregoriou, Stephen J. Gotts, Robert Desimone  Neuron 
Guilhem Ibos, David J. Freedman  Neuron 
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
The Normalization Model of Attention
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping?
Short-Term Memory for Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex
Prefrontal Neurons Coding Suppression of Specific Saccades
Jude F. Mitchell, Kristy A. Sundberg, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Masayuki Matsumoto, Masahiko Takada  Neuron 
John T. Serences, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Transient Slow Gamma Synchrony Underlies Hippocampal Memory Replay
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Tuned Normalization Explains the Size of Attention Modulations
Population Responses to Contour Integration: Early Encoding of Discrete Elements and Late Perceptual Grouping  Ariel Gilad, Elhanan Meirovithz, Hamutal.
The Postsaccadic Unreliability of Gain Fields Renders It Unlikely that the Motor System Can Use Them to Calculate Target Position in Space  Benjamin Y.
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2018)
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Maxwell H. Turner, Fred Rieke  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1067-1079 (December 2011) Multifocal Attention Filters Targets from Distracters within and beyond Primate MT Neurons' Receptive Field Boundaries  Robert Niebergall, Paul S. Khayat, Stefan Treue, Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo  Neuron  Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1067-1079 (December 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Task Layout (A) Trial sequence. The animals' gaze (gray arrow) was centered on the fixation spot (white square). During outward trials, the translating RDPs (red) moved eccentrically toward the periphery. During inward trials, they moved concentrically toward the fixation spot. Local dots in the RF pattern (green) always moved in the cells' Pr direction (upward arrow). In the translating RDPs they could move in the Pr or AP direction (downward arrow). The timing sequence of events is shown on the bottom. (B) Stimulus configurations. In one group of neurons (inside RF) the translating RDPs' trajectories crossed the RF (dashed circle). In the other group (outside RF) they passed nearby the RF. (C) Experimental conditions. The color of the fixation spot instructed the animals to attend either to the translating RDPs (tracking), or to the RF pattern (attend-RF) and to detect a change in the local dots' speed (large arrow), or to the fixation spot (attend-fixation). Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Behavioral Performance (A) Hit rates for change detections in the two translating RDPs (Lu: n = 84; Se: n = 63). Each point represents data from one recording session. (B) Distribution of hit rate differences between the two targets for the data shown in (A). The arrows indicate the mean difference. (C and D) (C) Average reaction times (RTs) for change detections in the two patterns and (D) the distributions of their differences. (E) Comparison of RTs to changes in both translating RDPs in individual sessions. The histogram displays p values (unpaired t test) across all comparisons. The dashed line represents the significance level (0.05). (F) Control experiment with monkey Se. The average RTs (top) and hit rate (bottom) follow the probability distributions (0.8 or 0.2) for changes in the two targets. The dashed rectangles show the corresponding means (±95% CI) in the main experiment. (G and H) (G) Hit rates and (H) RTs as a function of distance between the translating RDPs. All error bars represent 95% CI. Sample sizes are indicated. ns, nonsignificant, ∗p < 0.01, ∗∗p < 0.0001, unpaired t test. Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cell Examples (A) Single cell example in the inside RF configuration. The top panel illustrates different positions of the translating RDPs (red) relative to the RF (dashed circle). Neuronal responses were obtained while the animals detected a luminance change in the fixation spot and ignored the RDPs. Spike-raster plots (middle) and average responses (bottom) as a function of Pr (blue) and AP (gray) translating RDPs' position. Average responses to the Pr patterns were fit with a Gaussian function (black line). (B) Cell example in the outside RF configuration. Symbols are the same as in (A). Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Response Modulation between tracking and attend-RF: Inside RF Group (A) Cell example for the stimulus configuration with the translating RDPs dots locally moving in the Pr direction (top). Raster plots (middle) and average responses (±SEM, bottom) as a function of translating RDPs position during attend RF (green) and tracking (red). (B) Responses of the same unit when the translating RDPs dots moved in the AP direction. (C) Modulation indices (MIs, colors) of individual cells (ordinate) depending on the position of the Pr (top) and AP (middle) translating RDPs relative to the RF center (abscissa). Thick black lines indicate the estimated RF size and thin lines mark the RF regions over which average MIs (bottom) were computed (white circles, Pr; gray squares, AP). Error bars indicate 95% CI, and numbers above the abscissa the sample size for each RF region. The thick gray line represents the average difference (MI AP – MI Pr) ± 95% CI. Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Response Modulation between tracking and attend-RF: Outside RF Group (A and B) Cell example with Pr (A) and AP (B) translating RDPs. (C) Quantification of attentional modulation using MIs. The same conventions as in Figure 4. Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Response Modulation between tracking and attend-fixation: Outside RF Group (A and B) Cell example with Pr translating (A) and AP (B) translating RDPs. (C) Quantification of attentional modulation using MIs. The same conventions as in Figure 4. Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Response Modulation between attend-RF and attend-fixation: Outside RF Group (A and B) Single cell example with Pr translating (A) and AP (B) translating RDPs. (C) Quantification of attentional modulation using MIs. The same conventions as in Figure 4. Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Attention to Color (A) Raster plots and average spike density functions (±SEM) for RF patterns of different colors. The colors of the plots correspond to the ones of the stimuli. The gray area indicates the analysis window. (B) MIs between the responses to the green and red RF patterns. The arrow indicates the mean MI and the horizontal bar spans the 95% CIs. Neuron 2011 72, 1067-1079DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions