COSGC-Summer Internship 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Martian Landing Craft A Modified Egg Drop.
Advertisements

Beth Francis, M.Ed., M.S. Gifted Intervention Specialist Felicity Franklin Schools.
Miniature Modular Rack Launcher Combo Senior Design Group 3 Casey Brown Cyril John Keith Kirkpatrick Bryan Rickards.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
A non-bouncy object is dropped from the top of a 100m building. If the object comes to rest upon hitting the ground, does this defy conservation of energy?
Miniature Modular Rack Launcher Combo Senior Design Group 3 Casey Brown Cyril John Keith Kirkpatrick Bryan Rickards.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Review Problem #1 A 200 g ball is dropped from rest from a height of 2.0.
GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
UNC ROVERSAT IV University of Northern Colorado Critical Design Review Friday, June
DemoSat III Launch Readiness Review - July 29, 2005 Presented by: David Gooding Erik Andersen Anna Vigil Matt Elsner Al Crawley.
2003 CSU RoverSat. RoverSat: Team Members Structures: Ehren Ehmann Christopher Mai Electronics: John Rhoades Jesse Wilson.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Conservation of Energy
Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Team Flying Camels Nawar Chaker Paul Savage Tim Jacobs Pete Dokter Adam Swartley Capstone Project January 22, 2005.
Concept Design Review THE DUKES OF HAZARD CAMILLE LEGAULT, NEIL KENNEDY, OMAR ROJAS, FERNANDO QUIJANO, AND JIMMY BUFFI April 24, 2008.
In The News Genesis Mission We really need to know what the initial composition of the Solar System was and we'll get that by measuring the oxygen that.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
4/18/2009ASGC Symposium Project Members: Bryce Fox Jessica Avitia Sara Daniella Eriksson Mary Begay ASGC Symposium April 18, 2009 at Arizona State University.
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Physics 11 Force Diagrams Mr. Jean. The plan: Video clip of the day Force Diagrams Friction Friction Practice Questions.
M E T ROVER MSCD Engineering Technology Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 2004.
Potential Energy and Conservative Forces
Project: Weather Video Sat 4/2/04 Mesa State College, Grand Junction.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Slide Concepts March 26, 2009 [Cory Alban] [Mission Ops] [Locomotion] 1.
Parachute Design Unit. Design a parachute that will safely deliver its cargo to the ground according to the following constraints: * The parachute must.
The Balloon Launch “Spacecraft” and Environment ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik February 20, 2003.
1 Robotics Challenge Overview. 2 Why? -Viking was tested at the Dunes -Develop intelligent robots -Explore Robotics.
Group Members Mike Svendsen – Computer Engineer Steve Towey – Computer Engineer Brian Walker – Architect Richard George – Industrial Technology Client.
General Robotics General Robotics LEGO Rover Design Workshop 2000 Michael Rosenblatt.
LaACES High Altitude Ballooning Atmospheric Density By: Henry Hardee Sina Zarei Ian Walsdorf.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System. Team Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) Mike Kochanski – Software.
1 03/21/2006 GLAST CU Beam Test Workshop Scanning Table.
The Science Behind the Egg Drop Competition
Energy.
Bernadette Cannon Daniel Roh Daniel Du. Design Team America Rocketry Challenge’s goal is to get a model rocket to fly to a height of exactly 825 feet.
Cloudland Instruments Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot Compiled April 8th, 2016.
Physics 11 Rocket Design Day Mr. Jean. The plan: Video clip of the day Rocket Designs and builds.
LaACES High Altitude Ballooning Atmospheric Density.
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Preliminary Design Review
Autonomous Robot Platform
CanSat Competition Competition Objectives Pre-Launch Launch
G2’s Drive System Primer – Acceleration and Gear Ratios
CSU Robot Challenge 2010 Team: Ben Gindl, Katie Mantell, Sean Throckmorton, Tim Schneider, Travis Histed Advisors: Dr. Azer Yalin, Dr. Mark Lindsay, Grant.
Critical Design Review Presentation
Starting Student Space Hardware Programs IV
Electrical Engineer Responsibilities
Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Get your egg container Material
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Instructor: Dr. Tatiana Erukhimova
Final Readiness Review
COSGC-Summer Internship 2010
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
How to design a container that will protect an egg.
Lesson 1: What is Energy?.
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
Presentation transcript:

COSGC-Summer Internship 2010 Independent Project Sean Throckmorton, Luke Slominski Travis Histed , Ben Gindl

System Two Part: Lander – houses rover, delivers rover from altitude Rover - previous Robot Challenge contender, modified to interface to lander hardware, software modified for flight sequence

Project Goals Lander Rover 3kg including rover payload Minimum height drop of 100 feet Self contained power source Rover Less than 1.5 kg weight Fits into lander Complies with Robot Challenge guidelines and rules

Rover Modifications Created new sensor plate Improved sensor reading (different physical layout) Designed and manufactured a hitching system

Lander Sequence Parachute will deploy and slow decent At programmed height, chute and lid are released, lander free falls Foam cone will dissipate kinetic impact energy Rover will be securely fastened to platform Platform will orient itself using rover center of gravity

Programming Programming Analog Sensors Bascom AVR programming Programmed rover with decision making Programmed lander with sequence of landing step Transceiver Compass Power

Impact foam Conducted compressing testing of three types of foam Charcoal packaging foam shell Composite hobby foam and newspaper inside

Avionics Built separate circuit board for Lander control Used to control motors, light chute charge and detect Sonar data

Testing Impact Testing Pin Testing Foam Testing Parachute testing

Reliability Main modes of failure: Free-fall: Concern-Initial drag force from chute could damage release mechanisms Release Concern-Pin release was not %100 reliable in testing Impact Impact angle was strongly dependent on a uniform pin release Considered increasing length, however was not feasible Rover would stay fastened during impact Compress as much as possible

First Test Sequence Attach lander to two weather balloons that are tethered to the ground Lander will rise to 500 feet After 8 minutes lander will be released Parachute deploys Sonar triggers lid release 10 feet from the ground Platform swivels until the rover is upright After 15 minutes from being turned on the Rover will drive out and operate autonomously

First Test Results Unforeseen elements… Weather balloons were destroyed before payload left surface ~ ¼ of our budget lost in the atmosphere

Second Test Adequate not able to drop from desired height Instead rigged to a boom and swung over edge of 4-story CSU parking garage Minus the failure of lid detachment; the Lander worked as designed

Lessons Learned Testing crucial to success Layout procedures for testing and define modes of success and failure Assume you will need to conduct your final test twice and set aside money for it

Questions?