Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Advertisements

A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Shitao Li, Lingyan Wang, Michael A. Berman, Ye Zhang, Martin E. Dorf 
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Jaehoon Lee, Robyn D. Moir, Kerri B. McIntosh, Ian M. Willis 
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Regulation of Transcription by Ubiquitination without Proteolysis
DNA Methylation Mediated by a MicroRNA Pathway
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
PP1/PP2A Phosphatases Are Required for the Second Step of Pre-mRNA Splicing and Target Specific snRNP Proteins  Yongsheng Shi, Bharat Reddy, James L.
Yph1p, an ORC-Interacting Protein
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
The APC/C Subunit Mnd2/Apc15 Promotes Cdc20 Autoubiquitination and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Inactivation  Scott A. Foster, David O. Morgan  Molecular.
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Regulation of Ribonucleotide Reductase in Response to Iron Deficiency
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 623-632 (June 2006) General Repression of RNA Polymerase III Transcription Is Triggered by Protein Phosphatase Type 2A-Mediated Dephosphorylation of Maf1  Danuta Oficjalska-Pham, Olivier Harismendy, Wieslaw J. Smagowicz, Anne Gonzalez de Peredo, Magdalena Boguta, André Sentenac, Olivier Lefebvre  Molecular Cell  Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 623-632 (June 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.008 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Maf1 Interacts Mainly with Pol III via the N-Terminal Domain of C160 Subunit Protein extracts from cells expressing HA-tagged C160 and myc-tagged Maf1 were incubated with magnetic beads coated with anti-HA (IP Pol) or anti-myc (IP Maf1) antibodies. The beads were washed, and bound polypeptides were eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. (A) The proteins were silver stained; purified Pol III subunits (lane 2) are indicated on the left, myc-tagged Maf1 on the right. Mock control immunopurification (lane 4) allows the identification of immunoglobulins and BSA (stars). (B) Immunopurified samples (IP) were analyzed by Western blot for myc-tagged Maf1 using anti-myc antibody. (C) Crude extracts from E. coli (lanes 7–9) or baculovirus-infected insect cells (lanes 10–12) expressing HA-tagged C160 N-terminal fragment (HA-C160-NTF, lanes 7 and 10), 6 His-tagged Maf1 (His-Maf1, lanes 8 and 11), or both (lanes 9 and 12) were incubated with magnetic beads coated with anti-HA (lanes 7–9) or with a cobalt resin (lanes 10–12). The beads were washed, and bound polypeptides were eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using anti-HA or anti-His antibodies to detect HA-C160-NTF or His-Maf1, respectively. The polypeptides revealed by the tag-specific antibodies are identified on the right of each panel. Protein input analysis indicated that all experiments were conducted with equal quantities of HA-C160-NTF or His-Maf1 (see Input). An unspecific band migrating at the level of HA-C160-NTF was revealed by anti-HA antibodies in lane 11 input. The beads coated with anti-HA antibody retained specifically HA-C160-NTF (lanes 7 and 9, IP). His-Maf1 coimmunopurified with HA-C160-NTF (lane 9, CoIP). Reciprocally, HA-C160-NTF was specifically retained on the cobalt resin only when coexpressed with His-Maf1 (lane 12, Co-purif). Molecular Cell 2006 22, 623-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Genome-Wide Effect of Maf1 on Class III Gene Occupancy by the Transcription Machinery under Repressing Conditions (A) Chromatin was immunopurified via different tagged proteins: C160 (1, 2, and 3), Brf1 (4, 5, and 6), Bdp1 (7, 8, and 9), or τ95 (10, 11, and 12) from wild-type (wt) or maf1Δ strains, as indicated. The cells were fixed in formaldehyde either during exponential growth phase in rich medium (1, 4, 7, and 10), after 30 min treatment with rapamycin 0.2 ng/μl (2, 5, 8, and 11), or in stationary phase (3, 6, 9, and 12). The color scale diagrams show the changes of occupancy of the transcription machinery on its target loci (LEPTM), relative to the wild-type cells in exponential growth phase. (B) Enrichment of the tRNA-Leu and tRNA-Met genes by chromatin immunopurification of Brf1, Bdp1, C160, or τ95, in exponential or stationary growth phase in MAF1 or maf1Δ strains. Enrichment is normalized to that obtained with the wt strain in exponential growth phase. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 623-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Recruitment of Maf1 to Class III Genes Cells were incubated with rapamycin (0.2 ng/μl) for 0, 30, and 120 min then protein-DNA interactions were fixed by formaldehyde and whole-cells extracts were prepared as described. (A) Chromatin was immunoprecipitated via the epitope-tagged Maf1, and DNA enrichment was measured by real-time quantitative PCR analysis of genes encoding 35S rRNA, tRNA-Leu, and tRNA-Met. Enrichment is normalized to that obtained for 35S rRNA in exponentially growing cells (0 min sample). Error bars represent the standard deviation. (B) Immunodepletion of Maf1 from whole-cell extracts was evaluated by Western blotting before (−) or after (+) the immunopurification of epitope-tagged Maf1. (C) Selective depletion of intergenic regions adjacent to class III genes upon Maf1 immunodepletion before or after rapamycin addition. The target loci of the Pol III machinery (LEPTM) are highlighted in black. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 623-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Pol III-Maf1 Interaction Increases in Stress Conditions. Maf1 Is Phosphorylated, but Only the Dephosphorylated Form of Maf1 Interacts with Pol III Cells coexpressing HA-tagged C160 and myc-tagged Maf1 were collected either in exponential growth phase in rich medium (lanes 1, 4, 7, 10–13, and 16), after 60 min treatment with rapamycin 0.1 ng/μl (lanes 2, 5, 8, 15, and 18), or in stationary phase of growth (lanes 3, 6, 9, 14, and 17). Protein extracts were incubated with magnetic beads coated with anti-myc (IP Maf1, lanes 4–6 and 10–15) or anti-HA (IP C160, lanes 7–9 and 16–18) antibodies. The beads were washed, and the bound polypeptides were eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting using specific anti-HA or anti-myc antibodies. For clarity, the polypeptides revealed by the specific antibodies are identified on the right. (A) Analysis of Maf1 and C160 levels in protein extracts (Inputs, lanes 1–3), immunopurification of Maf1 (IP Maf1, lanes 4–6) and coimmunopurification of C160 (CoIP, lanes 4–6), and immunopurification of C160 (IP Pol III, lanes 7–9) and coimmunopurification of Maf1 (CoIP, lanes 7–9). (B) Western blot analysis using a modified acrylamide:bisacrylamide ratio SDS-PAGE of immunopurified Maf1-myc incubated without (lane 10) or with Calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP, lane 11) or with CIP and phosphatase inhibitors (lane 12). (C) Western blot analysis using a modified acrylamide:bisacrylamide ratio SDS-PAGE of Maf1-myc immunopurified from exponential phase, stationary phase, or rapamycin-treated cells (IP Maf1, lanes 13–15) and of Maf1-myc coimmunopurified with C160 from the same cells (IP Pol III, lanes 16–18). Molecular Cell 2006 22, 623-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Maf1 Accumulates in the Nucleus upon Rapamycin Treatment or in Stationary Phase Maf1 localization by immunofluorescence microscopy in exponentially growing wild-type cells taken before (Exp) or 60 min after addition of 0.2 ng/μl rapamycin (Rap) or in stationary phase cells (Stat). The cells were analyzed by phase-contrast light microscopy (Visible), by immunofluorescence (αMaf1), and by DAPI staining (DAPI). Maf1 signal (red) was essentially in the cytoplasm of exponentially growing wild-type cells and nuclear in stationary phase cells or in rapamycin-treated cells (see row Merge). The percentage of cells with the nuclear Maf1 signal clearly above the cytoplasmic signal is indicated. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 623-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PP2A Controls Maf1-Mediated Pol III Transcription Regulation via Maf1 Dephosphorylation and Nuclear Localization Wild-type strain (wt), pph21Δ pph3Δ, and pph21Δ pph3Δ pph22-172 mutant strains derivative were grown to midlog phase at 23°C and harvested at the indicated time after rapamycin (0.2 ng/μl) addition. To stop Maf1 neosynthesis during by the rapamycin treatment, cycloheximide (10 μg/ml) was added 10 min before rapamycin addition. (A) Crude extracts from TCA-precipitated cells were analyzed by using a modified acrylamide:bisacrylamide ratio SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using polyclonal anti-Maf1 antibodies. Specific Maf1 bands were identified by comparison with a crude extract from maf1Δ cells that contained only a faintly immunoreactive protein band (lane C). (B) Maf1 localization in wild-type, pph21Δ pph3Δ, and pph21Δ pph3Δ pph22-172 cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy using anti-Maf1 polyclonal antibodies before and 90 min after rapamycin addition. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. The results from three independent experiments are plotted as percent of cells with nuclear Maf1 immunofluorescence intensity clearly above the cytoplasmic signal. Error bars represent the standard deviation. (C) Total RNA was extracted from wild-type, pph21Δ pph3Δ, and pph21Δ pph3Δ pph22-172 mutant cells at different times after rapamycin addition and analyzed by Northern blot hybridization (25 μg/lane) with precursor tRNALeu (5′ pre-Leu) and U4 snRNA-specific probes. (D) Northern blot experiment (as above) was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. RNA values were normalized to those for U4 RNA and plotted as percent of inhibition of transcription upon rapamycin addition. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 623-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions