Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deborah L. Berry, Eric H. Baehrecke  Cell 
Advertisements

Biphasic Alteration of the Inhibitory Synapse Scaffold Protein Gephyrin in Early and Late Stages of an Alzheimer Disease Model  Eva Kiss, Karin Gorgas,
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Loss of Bin1 Promotes the Propagation of Tau Pathology
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 80, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene, dlg, is involved in structural plasticity at a glutamatergic synapse  Bo Guan, Beate Hartmann, Young-Ho Kho, Michael.
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Regulation of Presynaptic Terminal Organization by C
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Drosophila Ankyrin 2 Is Required for Synaptic Stability
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 120, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Requirement for Galectin-3 in Apical Protein Sorting
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 172, Issue 1, Pages e11 (January 2018)
Nervous Wreck Interacts with Thickveins and the Endocytic Machinery to Attenuate Retrograde BMP Signaling during Synaptic Growth  Kate M. O'Connor-Giles,
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene, dlg, is involved in structural plasticity at a glutamatergic synapse  Bo Guan, Beate Hartmann, Young-Ho Kho, Michael.
Hts/Adducin Controls Synaptic Elaboration and Elimination
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Heather Heerssen, Richard D. Fetter, Graeme W. Davis  Current Biology 
Unrestricted Synaptic Growth in spinster—a Late Endosomal Protein Implicated in TGF- β-Mediated Synaptic Growth Regulation  Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis 
G Protein βγ Subunits and AGS3 Control Spindle Orientation and Asymmetric Cell Fate of Cerebral Cortical Progenitors  Kamon Sanada, Li-Huei Tsai  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
PAR-1 Kinase Phosphorylates Dlg and Regulates Its Postsynaptic Targeting at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction  Yali Zhang, Huifu Guo, Helen Kwan,
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Live Imaging of Neuronal Degradation by Microglia Reveals a Role for v0-ATPase a1 in Phagosomal Fusion In Vivo  Francesca Peri, Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Postsynaptic Mad Signaling at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Maya Capelson, Victor G. Corces  Molecular Cell 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Distribution of postsynaptic density proteins in rat kidney: Relationship to neuronal nitric oxide synthase  Akihiro Tojo, David S. Bredt, Christopher.
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Taeyoon Kim, Jung-Hwa Tao-Cheng, Lee E. Eiden, Y.Peng Loh  Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Fig. 3. Hts and Dlg are in a complex at the postsynaptic membrane of larval NMJs.(A–B″) PLA with HtsM and Dlg antibodies (green) performed on third instar.
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Control of a Kinesin-Cargo Linkage Mechanism by JNK Pathway Kinases
Diaphanous regulates the presynaptic actin cytoskeleton.
Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones
Subperineurial glia are required for normal GluRIIA distribution.
Alzheimer Presenilins in the Nuclear Membrane, Interphase Kinetochores, and Centrosomes Suggest a Role in Chromosome Segregation  Jinhe Li, Min Xu, Hui.
Crucial Role of Drosophila Neurexin in Proper Active Zone Apposition to Postsynaptic Densities, Synaptic Growth, and Synaptic Transmission  Jingjun Li,
Volume 151, Issue 3, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 1996)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 393-404 (October 2009) Trans-Synaptic Transmission of Vesicular Wnt Signals through Evi/Wntless  Ceren Korkut, Bulent Ataman, Preethi Ramachandran, James Ashley, Romina Barria, Norberto Gherbesi, Vivian Budnik  Cell  Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 393-404 (October 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Wg Localization at the Neuromuscular Junction Is Regulated by Presynaptic Evi (A–D) Single confocal slices of NMJs labeled with anti-HRP and anti-Wg in (A) wild-type, (B) an evi mutant expressing transgenic Evi in motorneurons (evi, Evi-pre), (C) an evi mutant, and (D) an evi mutant expressing transgenic Evi in muscles (evi, Evi-post). (E) Normalized Wg levels inside synaptic boutons (pre-) and at the postsynaptic region (post-). (F) Western blot of larval brain extracts. Numbers at the right of the blot represent molecular weight in kDa. Calibration bar is 7 μm. Cell 2009 139, 393-404DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mutations in evi Mimic Abnormal Synaptic Phenotypes Observed in wg Mutants (A–D) Confocal images of NMJs labeled with anti-HRP and anti-DLG in (A and C) wild-type and (B and D) evi. (A and B) Projections of entire NMJs. (C and D) Single confocal slices of NMJ branches (arrowheads in C and D = abnormal boutons; arrows = ghost boutons). (E–G) Number of (E and G) boutons and (F) ghost boutons. Calibration bars are 30 μm for (A) and (B) and 13 μm for (C) and (D). Cell 2009 139, 393-404DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Evi Is Localized Pre- and Postsynaptically at the Neuromuscular Junction, and It Is Transported Trans-Synaptically as an Intact Protein (A) Predicted structure of Evi and the regions (underlined) used for generation of the Evi-Nex and Evi-Cin antibodies. (B–E) Single confocal slices of NMJs double stained with anti-HRP and antibodies to (B and D) Evi-Nex and (C and E) Evi-Cin in (B and C) wild-type and (D and E) evi. Single confocal slices of (F) Evi-RNAi-pre stained with anti-Evi-Nex and anti-HRP, (G) Evi-GFP-pre triple stained with anti-GFP, anti-HRP, and anti-Dlg, (H) evi;Evi-GFP-Pre stained with anti-GFP and anti-HRP, or (K) Evi-RNAi-post with anti-Evi-Nex and anti-HRP are shown. (I) Normalized pre- and postsynaptic Evi levels. (J) Single confocal slices of a bouton at (J1–J3) low and (J4–J6) high magnification in Evi-GFP-pre stained with anti-GFP, anti-Wg, and anti-HRP. (L and M) Images of NMJs from evi;Evi-GFP-pre triple stained with anti-GFP, anti-HRP, and antibodies to (L2 and L3) Evi-Nex or (M2 and M3) Evi-Cin. (N and O) Models on the potential mode of Evi trans-synaptic transfer. In (N) an extracellular region of Evi is cleaved and transported to the postsynaptic compartment. In (O) Evi is transferred as an intact protein through the use of vesicular compartments. Calibration bars are 2 μm for panels J1–J3 and 6 μm for the rest of the panels. Cell 2009 139, 393-404DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Evi Is Transferred from Cell to Cell and to the Medium (A and B) Single confocal slices of S2 cells (A) either untransfected (outlined by white circles) or transfected with Evi-GFP and (B) either transfected with mCherry or Evi-GFP (arrowheads = Evi-negative cells; arrows = Evi in the media). (C) Evi-GFP and Wg are transferred together into an untransfected cell (arrowheads). (D) Wg localizes with Evi into punctuate structures within filopodia (arrows), as well as in the medium (arrowhead). (E) Western blot of lysates and media from Evi-GFP transfected S2 cells. (F) Time-lapse imaging of an S2 cell transfected with Evi-GFP showing the shedding of an Evi-GFP vesicle to the medium (arrows). Calibration bars are 3 μm for (D) and 8 μm for the rest of the panels. Time points in (F) are in min. Cell 2009 139, 393-404DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Evi Is Localized to Pre- and Postsynaptic Vesicular Structures as well as Pre- and Post-Perisynaptic Membranes (A–K) Electron micrographs of synaptic bouton regions in preparations stained with antibodies to Evi-Nex or GFP, labeled with silver intensified 1.4 nm gold secondaries, or antibodies to Evi-Cin labeled with 18 nm gold secondaries. The presynaptic compartment has been overlayed in pink, and insets are high-magnification views of the structures indicated by the arrows. In (A), (B), and (D)–(H) samples were stained pre-embedding with anti-Evi-Nex or anti-GFP. In (C) samples were processed for an internalization assay. (I–K) Samples were stained post-embedding with anti-Evi-Cin. (A and B) Immunoreactive vesicles found at the SSR region. (C) Internalized Evi is found in postsynaptic SSR vesicles. (D and K) Localization of label at SSR membranes. (E–H) Evi label at the perisynaptic region of pre- and postsynaptic membranes. Arrowheads in (F) mark the active zone. (I) Evi localization at a presynaptic multimembrane body. (J) Evi-immunoreactive gold particles at the presynaptic region and the synaptic cleft. Calibration bar is 0.6 μm in (A), (C), (D), (K); 0.3 μm in (B) and (E)–(H); 0.2 μm in the insets of (A); 0.15 μm in the inset of (B); and 0.1 μm in the inset of (C). Cell 2009 139, 393-404DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Evi Downregulation in Muscle Results in Postsynaptic Wg and DFz2 Accumulation and Alterations in the Frizzled Nuclear Import Wg Pathway (A–D) Single confocal slices of NMJs triple stained with antibodies to HRP, DLG, and (A and B) DFz2 or (C and D) Wg in (A and C) wild-type and (B and D) Evi-RNAi-Post. (E) Wg and DFz2 immunoreactivity levels at the postsynaptic region. (F) Intensity of surface and internalized DFz2 at 5 and 60 min after the antibody-binding step in wild-type and Evi-RNAi-post. (G–J) Single confocal slices of NMJs subjected to the internalization assay, showing (G1–J1) surface DFz2 and (G2–J2) internalized DFz2 (G and I) at 5 min and (H and J) 60 min after the antibody-binding step in (G and H) wild-type and (I and J) Evi-RNAi-post. (K and L) Confocal slices of muscle nuclei in preparations stained with anti-DFz2-C and Hoechst in (K) wild-type and (L) evi mutants. (M) Normalized number of DFz2-C nuclear spots. Calibration bars are 10 μm for (A)–(H2) and (I)–(L); 5 μm for (A)–(D4). Cell 2009 139, 393-404DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Downregulating Evi in Postsynaptic Muscles Alters the Localization of dGRIP and Proposed Function of Evi in the Pre- and Postsynaptic Compartment (A and B) Single confocal slices of NMJs triple labeled with antibodies to HRP, dGRIP, and Lva in (A) wild-type and (B) Evi-RNAi-post (arrows in A = synaptic dGRIP; arrowheads in A and B = Golgi bodies. (C) dGRIP levels at the postsynaptic junctional region, Golgi bodies, and muscle cortex in wild-type and Evi-RNAi-post. (D) Postsynaptic DFz2 levels in wild-type, Evi-RNAi-post, and Evi-RNAi-post, dGRIP-post. (E) Bouton number in wild-type, evi mutants, and evi mutants expressing dGRIP-post. (F) DFz2C spots in wild-type, evi mutants, and evi mutants expressing dGRIP-post. (G) Proposed model for Evi function in the pre- and postsynaptic compartment (see text). Calibration bars are 6 μm for panels A1–A3, B1–B3 and 3 μm for panels A4–A6, B4–B6. Cell 2009 139, 393-404DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions