Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabio Trovato, Edward P. O’Brien  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Driving Forces for Transmembrane α-Helix Oligomerization
How Does a Simplified-Sequence Protein Fold?
Changing Chromatin Fiber Conformation by Nucleosome Repositioning
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Maik Goette, Martin C. Stumpe, Ralf Ficner, Helmut Grubmüller 
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Investigating How Peptide Length and a Pathogenic Mutation Modify the Structural Ensemble of Amyloid Beta Monomer  Yu-Shan Lin, Gregory R. Bowman, Kyle A.
Modeling Zymogen Protein C
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Yang Zhang, Andrzej Kolinski, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 92, Issue 11, Pages (June 2007)
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Transconformations of the SERCA1 Ca-ATPase: A Normal Mode Study
Yang Liu, Perry Palmedo, Qing Ye, Bonnie Berger, Jian Peng 
DNA Hairpins: Fuel for Autonomous DNA Devices
Shozeb Haider, Gary N. Parkinson, Stephen Neidle  Biophysical Journal 
Jesse L. Montgomery, Nick Rejali, Carl T. Wittwer 
Anton Arkhipov, Wouter H. Roos, Gijs J.L. Wuite, Klaus Schulten 
Blind Test of Physics-Based Prediction of Protein Structures
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Coarse-Grained Peptide Modeling Using a Systematic Multiscale Approach
On the Distribution of Protein Refractive Index Increments
Sandeep Kumar, Yuk Yin Sham, Chung-Jung Tsai, Ruth Nussinov 
A Second Look at Mini-Protein Stability: Analysis of FSD-1 Using Circular Dichroism, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, and Simulations  Jianwen A. Feng,
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Binding of the Bacteriophage P22 N-Peptide to the boxB RNA Motif Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ranjit P. Bahadur, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan,
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Modeling the Alzheimer Aβ17-42 Fibril Architecture: Tight Intermolecular Sheet-Sheet Association and Intramolecular Hydrated Cavities  Jie Zheng, Hyunbum.
Sukanya Sasmal, James Lincoff, Teresa Head-Gordon  Biophysical Journal 
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
Nonadditivity in Conformational Entropy upon Molecular Rigidification Reveals a Universal Mechanism Affecting Folding Cooperativity  Oleg K. Vorov, Dennis.
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)
Probing the “Dark Matter” of Protein Fold Space
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Solution Structure of Sco1
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Rita Pancsa, Daniele Raimondi, Elisa Cilia, Wim F. Vranken 
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein Folding by Essential Dynamics Sampling: Folding Landscape of Horse Heart Cytochrome c  Isabella Daidone, Andrea.
Atom Depth as a Descriptor of the Protein Interior
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Multiple Folding Pathways of the SH3 Domain
Hierarchical Cascades of Instability Govern the Mechanics of Coiled Coils: Helix Unfolding Precedes Coil Unzipping  Elham Hamed, Sinan Keten  Biophysical.
Open-State Models of a Potassium Channel
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
The Relation between α-Helical Conformation and Amyloidogenicity
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Reliability of Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction Methods
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
Hydrophobic Core Formation and Dehydration in Protein Folding Studied by Generalized-Ensemble Simulations  Takao Yoda, Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto  Biophysical.
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Interplay between Protein Thermal Flexibility and Kinetic Stability
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Yang Zhang, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Seongwon Kim, Takako Takeda, Dmitri K. Klimov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages 2119-2146 (October 2003) ASTRO-FOLD: A Combinatorial and Global Optimization Framework for Ab Initio Prediction of Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins from the Amino Acid Sequence  J.L. Klepeis, C.A. Floudas  Biophysical Journal  Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages 2119-2146 (October 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2 Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall schematic of ASTRO-FOLD approach for three-dimensional structure prediction of proteins. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Probability of α-helix formation for T59. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Contact diagram for global optimum of strand contact formulation for protein Sm D3 (T59). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Qualitative mapping of predicted β-strand to experimental structure of T59. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Contact diagram for strand contact formulation with modified β-strand prediction for protein Sm D3 (T59). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Comparison of predicted lowest energy tertiary structure (black) of T59 and experimentally determined structure (gray). All images generated with the RASMOL molecular visualization package (Sayle and Milner-White, 1995). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Contact diagram for global optimum strand-to-strand prediction for T114. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Qualitative mapping of predicted β-strand to experimental structure of T114. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Comparison of predicted lowest energy tertiary structure (black) of T114 and experimentally determined structure (gray). All images generated with the RASMOL molecular visualization package (Sayle and Milner-White, 1995). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Probability of α-helix formation for T170. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 Comparison of predictions for helix and β-strand locations with respect to the experimental observations. For each target, the top line represents the secondary structure content of the experimentally determined structure, whereas the second line identifies the subsequent prediction results. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 Contact map comparisons (clockwise from top left) for T130, T138, T160, and T150. The upper left triangle corresponds to interatomic distances calculated from the experimental structure, whereas the lower right triangle corresponds to those derived from the predicted structure. An upper distance cutoff of 30Å was used to emphasize small interatomic distances. The progression from small to large distances follows the dark to light shading. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 13 Average backbone RMSDs from experimental structure for helical (top) and β-strand (bottom) regions (length given by values on x-axis) of all CASP targets. Helix and strand locations defined as in experimental structures. Standard deviations are also provided. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 14 Average backbone RMSDs from experimental structure for loop regions (length given by values on x-axis) of all CASP targets. Loop locations defined as in experimental structures. Standard deviations are also provided. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 15 Smallest RMSDs for longest continuous segment between predicted and experimental structures of CASP targets. The RMS values are plotted versus the fraction of the total sequence represented by the longest continuous segments providing that RMS value. The top plot is for sequences with lengths <110 amino acids, whereas the bottom plot is for the remaining longer length sequences. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 16 Comparison of predicted lowest energy tertiary structure (left) and experimentally determined structure (right) for T132 and T137 (top to bottom). All images generated with the RASMOL molecular visualization package (Sayle and Milner-White, 1995). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 17 Comparison of predicted lowest energy tertiary structure (left) and experimentally determined structure (right) for T139 and T170 (top to bottom). All images generated with the RASMOL molecular visualization package (Sayle and Milner-White, 1995). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 18 Comparison of predicted lowest energy tertiary structure (left) and experimentally determined structure (right) for T138 and T160 (top to bottom). All images generated with the RASMOL molecular visualization package (Sayle and Milner-White, 1995). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 2119-2146DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74640-2) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions