Certification and Testing: Where Do We Go From Here?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Washington State Perinatal Collaborative Update on Quality Improvement Initiatives  Elective Deliveries 37-

Advertisements

Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (“MOVE” Act) Part #2: Creating Absent Voter Ballots That Will Be Sent By Or Fax Bureau of Elections.

12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Ballot On Demand David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology

U.S. Election Assistance Commission 2010 Voting Technology and Accessibility Research— Military Heroes Initiative.

Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.

By Kimball Brace, President Election Data Services, Inc. September 24, UOCAVA Survey : A Summary of Findings.

Toward Sustainable Water Use in Manufacturing NRE 701 Master’s Project Prospectus.

United States 1 Election Assistance Commission 1 Inspiring Change & Modernization in Election Administration Seattle, WA June 10, 2015.

Election Assistance Commission United States VVSG Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) NIST July 20, 2015 Gaithersburg,

United States Election Assistance Commission EAC UOCAVA Documents: Status &Update EAC Technical Guidelines Development Committee Meeting (TGDC)

NALEO Educational Fund Astrid Garcia Director of State Election Policy and Redistricting (213) California Citizens Redistricting.

TGDC Meeting, July 2011 IEEE P.1622 Update John P. Wack Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL

Hardware Independent Voting Systems. Caveats I am not talking about nor endorsing internet voting (or the slippery slope to lead to it) There are many.

IEEE P1622 Meeting, Feb 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,

Strategies for Non-Profit Organizations to Remain Viable During Tough Times April 10, 2013.

NIST Voting Program Activities Update February 21, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.

CEEMAN AccreditationCape Town, CEEMAN Accreditation IQA Dr.Virginijus Kundrotas.

Election Assistance Commission 1 Technical Guidelines Development Committee Meeting Certification Updates July 20, United States.

Test Plans, Test Cases, and Test Reports

Non-State Actors in WTO Dispute Settlement Prof. Dr. Karsten Nowrot The Role of Non-State Actors in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings International Annual.

How and what to observe in e-enabled elections Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)

1 The Evolution of Voting Systems Paul DeGregorio Vice Chairman Donetta Davidson Commissioner The U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

NIST Voting Program Page 1 NIST Voting Program Lynne Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology

TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Roadmap Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL

How are Presidents Elected? Unit 10 Part 2. Electoral College – Today – New Way The electoral college elects the president – NOT THE DIRECT or “POPULAR”

Transformational Government Workshop 9 th December 2010 Washington DC.

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Roadmap Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.

1 DECEMBER 9-10, 2009 Gaithersburg, Maryland TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Commissioner Donetta Davidson.

The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview Matthew Masterson Election Assistance Commission

© 2011 TGDC Meeting Scope of Standards and Testing Washington, DC February 8-9, 2016.

Election Assistance Commission 1 Technical Guidelines Development Committee Meeting Post-HAVA Voting System Requirements – Federal Perspective February.

1 EAC Executive Director Update Standards Board Brian D. Newby Carlsbad, CA April 14, 2016 United States Election Assistance Commission

TGDC Pre-Meeting July , 2015 NIST Facility - Gaithersburg, Maryland Members : Designated Federal Official Matthew V. Masterson, EAC Commissioner,

Election Assistance Commission 1 TGDC Meeting High Level VVSG Requirements: What do they look like? February, 09, United States.

Update: Revising the VVSG Structure Sharon Laskowski vote.nist.gov April 14, 2016 EAC Standards Board Meeting 1.

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Report from Workshop on UOCAVA Remote Voting Systems Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology

More than a Sticker…. Benefits of EAC Certification Presentation to the EAC Standards Board Carlsbad, CA April 14, 2016 Brian Hancock, Director, Testing.

Internship Workshop M Van Niekerk THE ROLE OF PROVINCIAL TREASURY 11 May 2016.

12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Alternatives to Software Independence Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology

The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.

NAAG Presidential Initiative Challenges in Health Care Cost, Competition and Policy Innovation Attorney General George Jepsen.

Product Manager 101: with What Does A Product Manager Actually Do?

Goals of this workshop Become familiar with the gender equality action plan you will use in workshops 4 and 5. Talk about your experiences and suggestions.

Who we are We work for well run evidence based public care

Personalisation in Practice: A National and Regional Perspective

National Land Commission, Kenya

Business Improvement Working Group

Community Tennis Network

UOCAVA Electronic Blank Ballot Delivery Use Case

Broadband as a Community Development Tool

presentation to the ICC Commission on the Digital Economy

Contents 30 years of multi-party elections expanding worldwide: 200 countries? How satisfied are we with the.

Privacy that is Assured Through Transparency

Implementing a sustainable student success initiative California State university Bakersfield November 9, 2017.

Voting Assistance Element 49.

Telling the time..

Panel Session: City Boundaries

Adrian Stephens nominee statement for Working Group Vice Chair

Election Assistance Commission

ISO management systems

Good governance at the local level - Challenges and Perspectives

Evaluating Health Promotion Materials in an Immunization Registry

Business & Product Challenges

Business & Product Challenges

1. Why Marketing Research?

14. Social-ethical audit B 14 / 1 BUSINESS ECONOMICS 5 / 6

Progressive Reforms at the State and Local Levels of Government

Presentation transcript:

Certification and Testing: Where Do We Go From Here? United States Election Assistance Commission Certification and Testing: Where Do We Go From Here? Panel Presentation - EVN Washington, DC– March 11, 2016 www.eac.gov

Why VVSG Working Group Model? From EAC perspective, it’s all about “more…” More inclusive More transparent More timely More innovative minds More relevant for election administrators More helping hands www.eac.gov

Where do we go from here? Challenges…. Coping with the new reality of trying to define what a voting system is…. Our older conceptual models of a “voting system” are being replaced with the realities of the much broader “election system” with less clear boundaries. (e-pollbooks, Ballot on demand, UOCAVA/Absentee ballot delivery, auditing systems….) Is the current “certification envelope” a sustainable strategy for the future? www.eac.gov

Where do we go from here? Challenges…. COTS…. From testing perspective, COTS product testing market driven, not statutory or rule based as in voting. More research needs to be done on appropriate levels of COTS testing. Significant dependencies on availability of testing and QA information from COTS manufacturers. New VVSG requirements should focus more on product/system interface level and on functional characteristics. (What system should do instead of how it should do it….) www.eac.gov

Where do we go from here? Challenges…. Additional new ways to assist State and local jurisdictions: RFP/RFI review and comment. Pursuing ways to educate and assist election officials into becoming more comfortable in their role as IT manage. Manufacturer Quality audits. Manufacturing facility audits. www.eac.gov

Contact Bhancock@eac.gov www.eac.gov #BeReady16 www.eac.gov