Shifting Away From Fee-For-Service: Alternative Approaches to Payment in Gastroenterology  Kavita Patel, Elise Presser, Meaghan George, Mark McClellan  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology  Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 497-506 (April 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.025 Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Alternative payment models reduce total cost of health care by reducing waste and inefficiency. Because physician payments make up only a small proportion of total health care costs, even a small reduction in total cost of care can result in a significant increase in physician payments. APMs, alternative payment models; FFS, fee-for-service; GI, gastrointestinal. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2016 14, 497-506DOI: (10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.025) Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Schematic of how physician payments would shift under alternate payment models. A gastroenterologist would need to first identify the proportion of clinical areas covered in one's practice and then determine the payment models which best align clinical efforts with current market practice. APMs, alterantive payment models; FFS, fee-for-service; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; GI, gastroenterology; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2016 14, 497-506DOI: (10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.025) Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions