Omar Davulcu, Peter F. Flynn, Michael S. Chapman, Jack J. Skalicky 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Liam M. Longo, Ozan S. Kumru, C. Russell Middaugh, Michael Blaber 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
The Architecture of Restriction Enzymes
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Parsimony in Protein Conformational Change
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
The Dynamic Basis for Signal Propagation in Human Pin1-WW
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Paul Robustelli, Kai Kohlhoff, Andrea Cavalli, Michele Vendruscolo 
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
The Active Conformation of the PAK1 Kinase Domain
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Dynamics of the Transition between Open and Closed Conformations in a Calmodulin C-Terminal Domain Mutant  Johan Evenäs, Anders Malmendal, Mikael Akke 
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Intrinsic Domain and Loop Dynamics Commensurate with Catalytic Turnover in an Induced-Fit Enzyme  Omar Davulcu, Peter F. Flynn, Michael S. Chapman, Jack J. Skalicky  Structure  Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 1356-1367 (October 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.014 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 2D [15N,1H] TROSY of Arginine Kinase Recorded at 800 MHz for the Shortest T1 Delay Measurement The average signal-to-noise ratio of signals from the shortest relaxation delay time of T1 and T1rho measurement are 165/1 and 181/1 at 50.65 MHz, 202/1 and 200/1 at 60.78 MHz, and 370/1 and 250/1 at 81.04 MHz. The average signal-to-noise ratio from the {1H}15N NOE reference spectrum is 165/1. Structure 2009 17, 1356-1367DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.08.014) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 15N Spin Relaxation Dispersion Curves for Selected Residues with μs-ms Timescale Dynamics: D88, H90, D192, and T206 (A) Individual fit dispersion curves at 15N Larmor frequencies 60.78 (red circles), 72.05 (green squares), and 81.04 MHz (blue triangles). (B) Collective fit dispersion curves for the same residues: D88 and H90 with G92 and D192 and T206 with 12 other residues (Table 1). (C) 15N spin relaxation dispersion curves for residues with no Rex. Errors were determined from duplicate measurements of R2eff. Structure 2009 17, 1356-1367DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.08.014) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Chemical Exchange in Substrate-Free Arginine Kinase Identified from Rex = R2β – R12HzNz/2 – ηxy(κ – 1) + R1N/2 κ = trimmed mean of 1 + (R2β × R12HzNz/2)/ηxy = 1.43. For apparently nonexchanging residues, the average Rex is 0.05 ± 2.5 s×1; error is shown with dashed lines. The large error is partly due to residue-specific variation in the 15N CSA tensor magnitude and orientation. The solid bars represent polypeptide segments having residues with 15N spin relaxation dispersion. Error bars are from measurements in triplicate. Residues with Rex greater than two standard deviations (5 s−1) are labeled. Structure 2009 17, 1356-1367DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.08.014) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conformational Dynamics of Arginine Kinase (A) Comparison of the dynamic domains of substrate-free and -bound structures of arginine kinase (Yousef et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 1998). Dynamic domains 1, 2, and 3 are colored, respectively, blue, green, and orange. The darker shade of each color is substrate-free and fixed domain is shown in yellow. (B) Only substrate free. (C–F) Amino acids with measurable Rex, colored red, with the exception of residues between 180 and 209, near loop L8, which are shown in green. The classical NTDs and CTDs are shown blue and sand. C and D are stereographic pairs with loop 8 residues labeled in D and all others labeled in C. D and F are rotated 90° with respect to C and E. (E) The interface between NTDs and CTDs and location of NTD hinge. In all panels, substrates ADP, NO3 anion, and arginine are shown from the substrate-bound structure to guide the eye. Structure 2009 17, 1356-1367DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.08.014) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 15N NMR Spin Relaxation Parameters of Substrate-Free Arginine Kinase Shown are T1 (A), T2 (B), and (c){1H}15N NOE (C) at 15N Larmor frequencies 50.65 (red), 60.78 (green), and 81.04 (blue). Individual values are listed in Table S1. Error bars on each measurement represent one standard deviation. The T1rho spin lock time at 50.65 and 60.78 MHz was shorter than optimal for the slow relaxing amide signals in loop L13, resulting in relatively large errors. A schematic diagram of arginine kinase secondary structure is shown at the top with α helices shown as cylinders, β strands as arrows, and loops and extended structure as lines. Structure 2009 17, 1356-1367DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.08.014) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Lipari-Szabo Model-Free Results for Substrate-Free Arginine Kinase Dynamics (A) Generalized order parameters. (B) τe/τs internal time constants. (C) Rex at 600 MHz. All fit parameters and model selections are listed in Table S2. Errors were determined from Monte Carlo simulations. Structure 2009 17, 1356-1367DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.08.014) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions