Michael Lutz, Paul Smits (JRC.B6/I.2), Lydia Martin-Roumegas (ENV.C.2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marine Pilot How the Marine Pilot is organized and current status
Advertisements

Marine Pilot How the Marine Pilot is organized and current status
(16 JUNE 2015) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
INTEGRATED INFORMATION E & H Action Plan Implementation.
Professionalising knowledge and data products It works!! Data –> Information flow for MSFD.
INSPIRE Developing the “Marine Pilot” project: Directorate-General Environment Governance, Information & Reporting Unit EC/EEA.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation INSPIRE Marine Pilot Progress & status November 2015.
Trine Christiansen European Environment Agency (EEA) Regional and EU level data streams for D5 Copenhagen, 28 April
INSPIRE Marine Pilot DIKE meeting 29,30/09/2014, Brussels Agenda item 7 Paul Smits, Andrej Abramić, Vanda Nunes de Lima European Commission Joint Research.
Outcomes from EMODnet/MSFD coordination meetings A. Giorgetti, M. Lipizer, M. Vinci EMODnet Chemistry, 3 rd year meeting, June 8-9, 2016 Helsinki, Finland.
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
Workflow on publishing monitoring data using INSPIRE
Break-out group discussion
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Agenda item 6 - INSPIRE Marine Pilot Progress & future developments
WELCOME to the 4th meeting of the INSPIRE marine pilot
Alignment and Integration to MSFD
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
MSFD integrated reporting
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
D5 EUTROPHICATION REVIEW PROCESS
Trine Christiansen March 19, 2013
EU Biodiversity Strategy and its mid-term review
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Workshop on synergies & differences between WFD and MSFD
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
MIWP MIWP actions follow-up
Status on eu actions from the kick-off meeting
Agenda item 6 - INSPIRE Marine Pilot Progress & your feedback
Workshop on synergies & differences between WFD and MSFD
Technical guidance for assessment under Article 8 MSFD
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
European Commission DG Environment
MSFD list of criteria elements
13th Meeting of the Working Group on Economic
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Natural water Retention Measures
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
MSFD list of criteria elements
Information on projects
Cluster Knowledge Integration and Dissemination
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Environment and Water Industry
The Common Implementation Strategy – an overview
1.
Developing a common understanding of Articles 8, 9 & 10 MSFD
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.
A Sea for Life MSFD related projects under Integrated Maritime Policy
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Use of WFD methods in MSFD initial assessment, GES definition and target setting Preliminary results of in-depth analysis focusing on eutrophication.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
MSFD – WFD assessment European Commission DG Environment
- Plans on the revision of reporting schemas/guidance -
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Presentation transcript:

Michael Lutz, Paul Smits (JRC.B6/I.2), Lydia Martin-Roumegas (ENV.C.2) Marine pilot Michael Lutz, Paul Smits (JRC.B6/I.2), Lydia Martin-Roumegas (ENV.C.2)

Background 2012: EEA proposes a practical activity on sharing chlorophyll-a data for the MSFD community to get acquainted with INSPIRE as part of Art. 19 2013 grand plan to have a big (4M) MSFD-INSPIRE project funded by the ISA programme 2014 start of small (250k) MSFD INSPIRE pilot Co-funded by ISA, JRC, and ENV with in-kind contributions from EEA and participating organisations

Good Environmental Status (GEnS) Commission Decision on criteria and methodological standards on Good Environmental Status 2010/477/EU It applies on: monitoring programmes regional sea assessment reporting process REPORTING MONITORING GES means that uses of the marine resources are conducted at a sustainable level: Ecosystems, including their hydro-morphological, physical and chemical conditions are fully functioning and in balance Maintained biodiversity Human activities are having sustainable effect on marine environment ASSESSMENT

Work packages 1.0 Overview of MSFD requirements in relation of INSPIRE 2.0 INSPIRE-based MSFD spatial data modelling 3.0 Development of the data flow - MS to EC/EEA within national (M)SDI & JRC “Sand Box” 4.0 EMODnet and INSPIRE 5.0 Document and analyse the cost and benefit 6.0 Training and capacity building

Key outcomes and lessons learned What you may know INSPIRE is all about interoperability. The national INSPIRE coordination structures should foresee training and awareness raising activities aimed at the marine community. They should also have discussions at national level to agree on the extent to which custodians of marine spatial data should implement INSPIRE. What you may not know Networking and community building are paramount to INSPIRE implementation. The guidelines, open source toolbox and the stakeholder engagement process of the INSPIRE marine pilot could be re-used in TG Data

4 May 2019

Key outcomes and lessons learned What you may know One should see the implementation of, and compliance with, INSPIRE not as a goal in itself, but as a means to facilitate the sharing and re-use of selected marine spatial data sets with other communities. The national INSPIRE coordination structures should foresee training and awareness raising activities aimed at the marine community. They should also have discussions at national level to agree on the extent to which custodians of marine spatial data should implement INSPIRE. What you may not know Rationalise the application of INSPIRE: metadata yes, sharing of data yes, but data harmonization only if it is clear that it adds value

Harmonization of MSFD data when it adds value MSDF monitoring programme on Human inducted eutrophication Biological diversity Concentrations of contaminants Water Framework Directive X Nitrate Directive Environ-mental Quality Standards Directive E-PRTR Dangerous Sub-stances Directive Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive Habitat Directive Birds Directive EEA Annual Mnt plan Including data sets in the INSPIRE requires resources. Priorities for the inclusion of marine spatial datasets in INSPIRE should be guided by their potential for re-use. Different directives require the same source data with more or less details. Integrating all the requirements into INSPIRE data models (exending them to answer to the all directives requiring those data) permits to re-use the same data serving the different directives.

obligations INSPIRE WFD MSFD OTHER DIRs (M)SDI

DG ENV EEA REPORTING INDICATOR DESCRIPTOR INSPIRE (M)SDI DATA

Key outcomes and lessons learned What you may know INSPIRE builds on existing international standards and specifications from ISO, OGC, and thematic communities such as IHO, and adds additional requirements. What you may not know MSFD community should adopt relevant data standards; the EC-EEA INSPIRE team should lower the barrier to include ISO-compliant community catalogues like the ones from EMODNET in the INSPIRE geoportal

Results from the exercise MSFD Descriptor D5: Human-induced eutrophication is minimised, especially adverse effects thereof, such as losses in biodiversity, ecosystem degradation, harmful algal blooms and oxygen deficiency in bottom waters Including following indicators: Chlorophyll concentration Issues encountered when combining data from DE, DK, and NL: Metadata: use of keywords and language Data: different units of measures, different measurement methods for the same parameter, different field names and values for similar things

What INSPIRE offers? Common approach to: Language Field description About field value, some of them are solved with the use of codelists stored in reference multi-languages registries Definition of field value Codelists collected in registry/thesauri solves also the meaning of the field value (semantic interoperability) Indication of methodology applied to compute parameters On Metadata information On data model (EMF)

What INSPIRE does not solve Scale of geospatial element The scale of exposed data are stored in metadata for interoperability No mandate of exposing specific dataset in a pre-defined scale Unit of measures INSPIRE manages the parameters value and the related unit of measures used for them. No mandate of exposing specific parameter values in a pre-defined unit of measure These aspects need to be agreed in reporting requirements

Thank you!