Induction of Large DNA Palindrome Formation in Yeast: Implications for Gene Amplification and Genome Stability in Eukaryotes  David K Butler, Lauren E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Midterm Breakdown Part I Part II: Part III : 8 calculations
Advertisements

Karyn Goudie Belanger, Kenneth N Kreuzer  Molecular Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (May 1998)
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Fig 18-1 Figure: Caption: The restriction enzyme EcoRI recognizes and binds to the palindromic nucleotide sequence GAATTC. Cleavage of the DNA at.
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Strand Invasion Structures in the Inverted Repeat of Candida albicans Mitochondrial DNA Reveal a Role for Homologous Recombination in Replication  Joachim.
Molecular Biology Restriction enzymes.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Christoph Heiner Westphal, Philip Leder  Current Biology 
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Reciprocal Crossovers and a Positional Preference for Strand Exchange in Recombination Events Resulting in Deletion or Duplication of Chromosome 17p11.2 
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Interchromosomal Transfer of Epigenetic States in Ascobolus: Transfer of DNA Methylation Is Mechanistically Related to Homologous Recombination  Vincent.
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Short Telomeres in Yeast Are Highly Recombinogenic
Luther Davis, Nancy Maizels  Cell Reports 
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Karyn Goudie Belanger, Kenneth N Kreuzer  Molecular Cell 
Adaptive Amplification
Molecular Biology Restriction enzymes.
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
High Frequency Retrotransposition in Cultured Mammalian Cells
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Topological Selectivity in Xer Site-Specific Recombination
ResT, a Telomere Resolvase Encoded by the Lyme Disease Spirochete
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Reciprocal Crossovers and a Positional Preference for Strand Exchange in Recombination Events Resulting in Deletion or Duplication of Chromosome 17p11.2 
Coding Joint Formation in a Cell-Free V(D)J Recombination System
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
CTG Repeats Show Bimodal Amplification in E. coli
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Long G Tails at Both Ends of Human Chromosomes Suggest a C Strand Degradation Mechanism for Telomere Shortening  Vladimir L Makarov, Yoko Hirose, John.
Telomere Dysfunction Increases Mutation Rate and Genomic Instability
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Cell 
XRCC3 Controls the Fidelity of Homologous Recombination
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Gene Amplification: Yeast Takes a Turn
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Induction of Large DNA Palindrome Formation in Yeast: Implications for Gene Amplification and Genome Stability in Eukaryotes  David K Butler, Lauren E Yasuda, Meng-Chao Yao  Cell  Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages 1115-1122 (December 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81805-X

Figure 1 The Intramolecular Recombination Pathway of rDNA Palindrome Formation in T. thermophila A set of two possible modes of recombination is shown: a classic Holliday junction/resolvase reaction and a version of the single-strand annealing reaction. Both strands of DNA are shown. The 42 bp inverted repeats are depicted by double arrowheads. The thin lines represent rDNA sequence, and the thick lines represent sequence upstream of the 42 bp inverted repeats (note that the upstream sequence is not preserved in the palindrome). The hatched rectangular box represents telomeric sequence. In this figure, the pathway begins with excised rDNA. The broken end at the right (i.e., the 3′ end of the excised rDNA) is healed by the de novo addition of a telomere. In T. thermophila, new telomere formation is tightly coupled to chromosome breakage (Fan and Yao 1996). The only known exception to this rule is breakage next to short inverted repeats. Even though new telomere formation is depicted as an early event, the timing of this reaction with respect to other reactions in the pathway is not precisely known. Step (a), intrastrand pairing of the inverted repeats forms a cruciform structure (cruciforms are isomers of Holliday junctions, intermediates in homologous recombination). Previous experiments (Yasuda and Yao 1991) have shown that it is the symmetry of the inverted repeats and not their sequence per se that is required for this pathway, implying that the inverted repeats must undergo intrastrand pairing. Step (b), cleavage of the cruciform structure across the four-way junction by a resolvase. Step (c), sealing of the nick by ligase to form a giant hairpin. Step (d), bidirectional DNA replication originating within the giant hairpin forms the mature rDNA palindrome. Steps (d), (e), and (f) outline the single-strand annealing version of the pathway. Step (e), 5′ to 3′ exonuclease degrades one strand of the inverted repeats. Step (f), self-annealing of the inverted repeat, excision of nonhomologous sequences, and sealing of the nick by ligase forms a giant hairpin. Step (d), bidirectional DNA replication originating within the giant hairpin forms the mature rDNA palindrome. Cell 1996 87, 1115-1122DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81805-X)

Figure 2 Galactose Induction of GalHO in Strains with p42IR and pNo42IR (A) Maps of p42IR and pNo42IR. For purposes of presentation only, the circular plasmids are depicted as linear; they are arbitrarily linearized at a point between the second HO cut site and the tract of telomeric repeats. The 42 bp inverted repeats are symbolized by the symmetrical arrowheads. The 42 bp repeats are separated by a 28 bp nonpalindromic spacer. The repeats are not to scale in the map. “HO cs” refers to HO cleavage site. The thin lines represent pBR322 sequence. (B) Restriction map and the expected sizes of ScaI and PstI fragments from the intact plasmid, the HO cleaved plasmid, and the palindrome. The probe used in this experiment is a 0.6 kb restriction fragment containing mostly pBR322 sequence whose location is indicated below the map of the intact plasmid. These are not drawn to scale. In the ScaI analysis, a band corresponding to cleavage at the distal HO cut site is not seen because there is a ScaI site in CEN4. There is a PstI site within 20 bp of the HO cut site nearest the 42 bp inverted repeat. Thus, in the PstI analysis, the band that is visible in uninduced cells is the same size as that from the HO cleaved plasmid. (C) ScaI and PstI Southern analysis of uninduced (0 hr) and induced p42IR and pNo42IR cells. The timepoints refer to time after induction of GalHO by shift to galactose medium. The filled arrowheads mark the positions of the palindromic fragments. The open arrowheads mark the positions of the cleaved plasmid in the ScaI lanes. Cell 1996 87, 1115-1122DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81805-X)

Figure 4 Analysis of Ura+ colonies from p42IR-1 Plating to Galactose Medium (A) Southern blot analysis of 10 randomly selected Ura+ colonies. Undigested genomic DNA was electrophoresed through a 0.5% agarose gel. Size markers are given in kb pairs. The arrow marks the position of the palindrome. The probe in this experiment was the MCA oligonucleotide that hybridizes to the 28 bp between the 42 bp inverted repeats. (B) EcoO109I analysis of the seven Ura+ colonies with palindrome shown above (labeled with corresponding numbers) and, as a control, EcoO109I digestion of pPCB08. pPCB08 is the clone used for the sequencing analysis shown in Figure 3. The size markers, given in bp, are from a PstI digest of phage λ. The map shows the position of the relevant EcoO109I sites. The brackets below the map mark the size of the 42 bp inverted repeat region and the extent of flanking sequence to the EcoO109I sites. The total predicted size of the central EcoO109I fragment is 190 bp. The probe in this experiment is also the MCA oligonucleotide. Figure 3 Restriction Mapping and Sequence Analysis of a Palindrome Formed by S. cerevisiae Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from two independently isolated strains (designated as 1 and 2 and indicated on top of the lanes) harboring a palindrome derived from p42IR. The uncut samples and the EcoRI-, HindIII-, PstI-, and ScaI-treated samples were electrophoresed on the same 1% agarose gel. The BamHI-treated samples were electrophoresed on a 3% agarose gel. Size markers are given in kb pairs. The hybridization probe described in Figure 2 was used in the analysis of the restriction enzyme–digested samples, and an oligonucleotide (MCA) that contained the 28 nt sequence between the 42 bp inverted repeats was used in the analysis of the uncut samples. The expected restriction fragments containing the palindromic center are shown above the restriction map. The probe spans the BamHI site, thus detecting an additional fragment in BamHI-digested samples. The palindromic center was cloned as a 500 bp BamHI fragment from the strain designated as “2.” The sequence in the box consists of the 42 bp inverted repeats with the 28 bp nonpalindromic spacer. The arrows mark the extent of the repeats. The sequence on each side of the box is identical to the sequence that is immediately left of the 42 bp inverted repeats in p42IR. Symbols: Ba, BamHI; Bg, BglII; Ec, EcoRI; H3, HindIII; Ps, PstI; Sc, ScaI; symmetrical arrowheads represent the 42 bp inverted repeats. (The repeats are not to scale in the figure.) Cell 1996 87, 1115-1122DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81805-X)

Figure 4 Analysis of Ura+ colonies from p42IR-1 Plating to Galactose Medium (A) Southern blot analysis of 10 randomly selected Ura+ colonies. Undigested genomic DNA was electrophoresed through a 0.5% agarose gel. Size markers are given in kb pairs. The arrow marks the position of the palindrome. The probe in this experiment was the MCA oligonucleotide that hybridizes to the 28 bp between the 42 bp inverted repeats. (B) EcoO109I analysis of the seven Ura+ colonies with palindrome shown above (labeled with corresponding numbers) and, as a control, EcoO109I digestion of pPCB08. pPCB08 is the clone used for the sequencing analysis shown in Figure 3. The size markers, given in bp, are from a PstI digest of phage λ. The map shows the position of the relevant EcoO109I sites. The brackets below the map mark the size of the 42 bp inverted repeat region and the extent of flanking sequence to the EcoO109I sites. The total predicted size of the central EcoO109I fragment is 190 bp. The probe in this experiment is also the MCA oligonucleotide. Figure 3 Restriction Mapping and Sequence Analysis of a Palindrome Formed by S. cerevisiae Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from two independently isolated strains (designated as 1 and 2 and indicated on top of the lanes) harboring a palindrome derived from p42IR. The uncut samples and the EcoRI-, HindIII-, PstI-, and ScaI-treated samples were electrophoresed on the same 1% agarose gel. The BamHI-treated samples were electrophoresed on a 3% agarose gel. Size markers are given in kb pairs. The hybridization probe described in Figure 2 was used in the analysis of the restriction enzyme–digested samples, and an oligonucleotide (MCA) that contained the 28 nt sequence between the 42 bp inverted repeats was used in the analysis of the uncut samples. The expected restriction fragments containing the palindromic center are shown above the restriction map. The probe spans the BamHI site, thus detecting an additional fragment in BamHI-digested samples. The palindromic center was cloned as a 500 bp BamHI fragment from the strain designated as “2.” The sequence in the box consists of the 42 bp inverted repeats with the 28 bp nonpalindromic spacer. The arrows mark the extent of the repeats. The sequence on each side of the box is identical to the sequence that is immediately left of the 42 bp inverted repeats in p42IR. Symbols: Ba, BamHI; Bg, BglII; Ec, EcoRI; H3, HindIII; Ps, PstI; Sc, ScaI; symmetrical arrowheads represent the 42 bp inverted repeats. (The repeats are not to scale in the figure.) Cell 1996 87, 1115-1122DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81805-X)

Figure 3 Restriction Mapping and Sequence Analysis of a Palindrome Formed by S. cerevisiae Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from two independently isolated strains (designated as 1 and 2 and indicated on top of the lanes) harboring a palindrome derived from p42IR. The uncut samples and the EcoRI-, HindIII-, PstI-, and ScaI-treated samples were electrophoresed on the same 1% agarose gel. The BamHI-treated samples were electrophoresed on a 3% agarose gel. Size markers are given in kb pairs. The hybridization probe described in Figure 2 was used in the analysis of the restriction enzyme–digested samples, and an oligonucleotide (MCA) that contained the 28 nt sequence between the 42 bp inverted repeats was used in the analysis of the uncut samples. The expected restriction fragments containing the palindromic center are shown above the restriction map. The probe spans the BamHI site, thus detecting an additional fragment in BamHI-digested samples. The palindromic center was cloned as a 500 bp BamHI fragment from the strain designated as “2.” The sequence in the box consists of the 42 bp inverted repeats with the 28 bp nonpalindromic spacer. The arrows mark the extent of the repeats. The sequence on each side of the box is identical to the sequence that is immediately left of the 42 bp inverted repeats in p42IR. Symbols: Ba, BamHI; Bg, BglII; Ec, EcoRI; H3, HindIII; Ps, PstI; Sc, ScaI; symmetrical arrowheads represent the 42 bp inverted repeats. (The repeats are not to scale in the figure.) Cell 1996 87, 1115-1122DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81805-X)

Figure 5 Analysis of Palindrome Formation in a Wild-Type Strain and a rad52Δ Strain Southern analysis of undigested genomic DNA at 0 hr (uninduced), 24 hr, and 48 hr in galactose from a strain that is wild type with respect to recombination and from a strain carrying a null allele of the RAD52 gene. The arrow to the right of the gel marks the position of the palindrome. The size markers are in kb pairs. The probe in this experiment, derived from pBR322, hybridizes to one of the chromosomes of the host strain, resulting in the smear of hybridization in the unresolved region at the top of the gel. Fragments A and B are from the intact plasmid: relaxed and supercoiled forms, respectively. As expected, they are most prominent in the uninduced culture. Fragment B is from plasmid with a single HO cut (and plasmid broken during isolation). Fragment C is from plasmid with two HO cuts. Fragment C represents the monomeric substrate for palindrome formation and, as expected, is half the size of the palindrome band. Cell 1996 87, 1115-1122DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81805-X)