Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Advertisements

Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Functional Genomics in Evolutionary Research
M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Example of a DNA Array (note green, yellow red colors; also note that only part of the total array is depicted)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Cosuppression in Drosophila: Gene Silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh Transgenes Is Polycomb Dependent  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Bongyong Lee, Joseph Mazar, Muhammad N
Gene Chips.
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Influence of RNA Labeling on Expression Profiling of MicroRNAs
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Boye L. Jensen, Bianca Mann, Ole Skøtt, Armin Kurtz 
Identification and Validation of Long Noncoding RNA Biomarkers in Human Non–Small- Cell Lung Carcinomas  Hui Yu, MD, Qinghua Xu, PhD, Fang Liu, PhD, Xun.
Accurate Molecular Characterization of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues by microRNA Expression Profiling  Anna E. Szafranska, Timothy S. Davison,
Comparison of gene expression profiles in granulosa and cumulus cells after ovulation induction with either human chorionic gonadotropin or a gonadotropin-releasing.
A microRNA profile comparison between thoracic aortic dissection and normal thoracic aorta indicates the potential role of microRNAs in contributing to.
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
by Gregory H. Underhill, David George, Eric G. Bremer, and Geoffrey S
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
The renal segmental distribution of claudins changes with development
Molecular Classification of Renal Tumors by Gene Expression Profiling
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Enhancing 1α-Hydroxylase Activity with the 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-1α-Hydroxylase Gene in Cultured Human Keratinocytes and Mouse Skin  Tai C. Chen, Xue Hong.
Haploidy in Humans: An Evolutionary and Developmental Perspective
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Structure and liver cell expression pattern of the HFE gene in the rat
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Aberrant Mineralization of Connective Tissues in a Mouse Model of Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum: Systemic and Local Regulatory Factors  Qiujie Jiang, Qiaoli.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
A Global Profile of Germline Gene Expression in C. elegans
Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the Defects in Fragile X Syndrome Neurons Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells  Tomer Halevy, Christian Czech, Nissim.
Hiroaki Matsunami, Linda B Buck  Cell 
Magnus Åbrink, Eric Larsson, Anders Gobl, Lars Hellman 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Microarray Gene Expression Analysis of Fixed Archival Tissue Permits Molecular Classification and Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets in Diffuse.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
X Chromosome Inactivation Is Mediated by Xist RNA Stabilization
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Molecular differentiation between osteophytic and articular cartilage – clues for a transient and permanent chondrocyte phenotype  K. Gelse, A.B. Ekici,
Clustered Organization of Reproductive Genes in the C. elegans Genome
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
The Regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 Gene Reveals a Function for Sex-lethal in Translational Control  Greg J Bashaw, Bruce S Baker  Cell  Volume 89,
R.H. Brophy, B. Zhang, L. Cai, R.W. Wright, L.J. Sandell, M.F. Rai 
Haploinsufficiency at the Nkx3.1 locus
Discrimination of Melanocytic Tumors by cDNA Array Hybridization of Tissues Prepared by Laser Pressure Catapulting  Bernd Becker, Alexander Roesch, Christian.
Babu J. Padanilam, Andrew J.P. Lewington, Marc R. Hammerman 
Ramine Parsa, Annie Yang, Frank McKeon, Howard Green 
Tsix Silences Xist through Modification of Chromatin Structure
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Intestinal myofibroblasts in innate immune responses of the intestine
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Human myometrium and leiomyomas express gonadotropin-releasing hormone 2 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone 2 receptor  Jason D. Parker, D.O., Minnie.
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Michael U. Shiloh, Paolo Manzanillo, Jeffery S. Cox 
Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 791-800 (June 2004) Major Molecular Differences between Mammalian Sexes Are Involved in Drug Metabolism and Renal Function  John L Rinn, Joel S Rozowsky, Ian J Laurenzi, Petur H Petersen, Kaiyong Zou, Weimin Zhong, Mark Gerstein, Michael Snyder  Developmental Cell  Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 791-800 (June 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.005

Figure 1 Hierarchical Clustering of Microarray Data (A) Each gene is represented by 48 individual hybridization measurements or probe intensities across the five tissues. The probe intensities were normalized within a chip to the median intensity of all probes on that array (intrachip normalization). The median value of the 48 normalized probe intensities (i.e., the global median) thus serves as a reference to compare the expression of each gene across experiments (interchip comparisons). Probe intensities above and below the global median are denoted by shades of red or blue, respectively; those at the global median are colored yellow. (B) As expected, expression profiles from a given tissue clustered tightly together, whereas expression profiles across different tissues exhibited wider variation. Genes demonstrating tissue-specific expression were representative of the normal physiology of the tissue in which they are expressed, thus confirming the biological accuracy of our data. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 791-800DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.005)

Figure 2 Extensive Sex-Specific Expression in the Kidney (A) Twenty-seven genes were differentially expressed by sex in the kidney. One-quarter, seven, of these genes are drug and steroid metabolism genes. The rest are mainly comprised of osmo-regulation genes or genes with yet unresolved cellular roles. Shades of blue represent the degree to which expression in the male is lower than the female median expression level (female-specific expression). Shades of red indicate the degree to which expression in the male is above the female median expression level (male-specific expression). The brightness of the color represents the amount of expression. p values of differential expression between sexes are also listed. (B) We independently verified the expression of seven genes in the kidney using quantitative real-time PCR. Each reaction was performed in triplicate. ΔRT represents the amount of pooled cDNA amplified in the reaction per cycle. 100% of the randomly selected genes demonstrated the same sex-specific expression pattern observed in the microarray data. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 791-800DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.005)

Figure 3 Cbg mRNA Localizes to the Proximal Tubules in a Female-Specific Fashion Cbg mRNA expression was analyzed in vivo using RNA In Situ Hybridization (RISH) using sense and antisense probes to Cbg to female (left) and male (right) kidney tissue preparations. In corroboration with the microarray data, only the female kidney preparation showed Cbg mRNA staining. Also, the staining suggests that Cbg is specifically expressed in the corticomedullary junction, a site important for osmotic regulation. Together, these results suggest that Cbg may be playing a sex-specific role osmotic regulation. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 791-800DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.005)

Figure 4 Sex-Specific Expression in the Liver (A) Six genes were differentially expressed by sex in the liver, a majority of which are drug and steroid metabolism genes. Shades of blue represent the degree to which expression in the male is below the female median expression level (female-specific expression). Shades of red indicate the degree to which expression in the male is above the female median expression level (male-specific expression). The brightness of the color represents the amount of expression. p values of differential expression between sexes are also listed. (B) We independently verified three genes demonstrating sex-specific expression in the liver quantitative real-time PCR. Each reaction was performed in triplicate. ΔRT represents the amount of cDNA amplified in the reaction per cycle. 100% of the randomly selected genes demonstrated the same sex-specific expression pattern observed in the microarray data. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 791-800DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.005)

Figure 5 Sex-Specific Expression in the Mouse and Human Hypothalamus (A) Few genes exhibited sex-specific expression in the hypothalamus of mice and humans. All genes demonstrating sex-specific expression in the mouse and human hypothalamus were either encoded on the Y chromosome or involved in X chromosome inactivation. Shades of blue represent the degree to which expression in the male is below the female median expression level (female-specific expression). Shades of red indicate the degree to which expression in the male is above the female median expression level (male-specific expression). *TSIX met our stringent criterion in the hypothalamus and ovaries but was slightly under our criterion in the liver and kidney. (B) We independently verified four genes demonstrating sex-specific expression in human hypothalamus using quantitative real-time PCR. Each reaction was performed in triplicate. ΔRT represents the amount of cDNA amplified in the reaction per cycle. 100% of the randomly selected genes demonstrated the same sex-specific expression pattern observed in the microarray data. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 791-800DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.005)