Final Environmental Impact Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City Council Hearing March 3, 2008 SIERRA POINT BIOTECH PROJECT.
Advertisements

Planning Commission, City of Brisbane Public Hearing for the Sierra Point Biotech Project November 29, 2007 SIERRA POINT BIOTECH PROJECT.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Draft Environmental Impact Report SMUD Amendment of the Sphere of Influence and SMUD Yolo Annexation.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED SMUD SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND ANNEXATION Presented by Chris Tooker Friday, October.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Economic and Level of Service Impacts Resulting from the Annexation by SMUD of PG&E’s Service Territories in Yolo County April 5, 2006.
City of St Helena Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project April 28, 2015 St. Helena City Council Meeting.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage, Executive Officer; Donald J. Lockhart, Assistant Executive Officer; Diane Thorpe, Commission.
Implementation of Pinyon-Juniper Woodland Treatment Elements of the BLM’s Ely RMP/EIS: Opportunities for Public-Private Partnerships to Secure Environmental.
Charles Hosken, General Manager Imperial Irrigation District
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Final Environmental Impact Report Amendment of SMUD’s Sphere of Influence and SMUD Yolo Annexation.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD ANNEXATION Presented to Yolo LAFCo September 19, 2005.
Yolo LAFCO Agricultural Conservation Policy Yolo County Local Agency Formation Commission Commissioners  Public Member Olin Woods, Chair   County Member.
Lyndonville Electric Department Feasibility Analysis Review December 2,
Broadview Second Access. Parlette Annexation What has changed? Parlette has asked for reconsideration –Recitals in agreement are not operative provisions.
Placer LAFCO Municipal Service Review North Tahoe/Martis Valley Area Northstar CSD and PCWA.
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
Application for New or Different Service South San Joaquin Irrigation District (SSJID) Case Study San Joaquin LAFCo CALAFCO 2010 Annual Conference October.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Delta Plan Draft Program EIR Status and Summary of Approach October 27, 2011 Not Reviewed/Approved by Delta Stewardship Council1October 27, 2011.
1 Sunrise Powerlink Project Update Orange County Business Council March 10, 2009.
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop Workshop June 12, 2007 Folsom Annexation – South of Highway 50.
Solar Power Project at the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant August 26, 2015.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority February 26, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Subcommittee Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Yolo HCP/NCCP Presentation to the Solano County Water Agency Water Policy Committee Petrea Marchand JPA Executive Director May 11, 2015.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
LPEA BAYFIELD SUBSTATION LA PLATA COUNTY LOCATION & EXTENT REVIEW March 12, 2015.
Scoping Meeting August 25, 2010 Project Description, and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Overview.
Environmental Scoping Meeting April 9, Meeting Outline Overview of the Proposed Project Purpose of the Scoping Meeting Environmental Review Process.
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water System Improvement Program Bay Division Pipeline Project July 14, 2009.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTORS : 9.02Agricultural.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
Sixth Amendment to the Orange County / City of Winter Garden Joint Planning Area Agreement and Utilities Territorial Agreement April 17, 2007 Sixth Amendment.
STOCKTON DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (DWSP) Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certification Hearing November 8, 2005 Mark J. Madison, Director Municipal.
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
Environmental Quality Board
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Overview of the Draft EIR
Providence Saint John’s Health Center Phase II Project
City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Bureau of Engineering
City Council Hearing #2 April 18, 2017.
Contra Costa Watershed Forum May 11, 2016
Civic Center Sports Field Study Session & Quarterly Update
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Fifth Standard Solar Project Complex
City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Bureau of Engineering
State Highway Jurisdictional Transfer (Turnback) Program
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop June 12, 2007
Lower Makefield Township Community Meeting
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 400KV ±250 KM POWER LINE FROM BORUTHO S/S IN MOKOPANE TO BOKMAKIERIE S/S IN NZHELELE & ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION.
Vista Verde Residential Project Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Meeting May 19, 2010 Michael Brandman Associates.
UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND ANNEXATION
Brackish Water Desalination Project
Capital Improvement Plans
Stockton City Council December 6, 2007 Land Use Diagram Changes
Brackish Water Desalination Project Draft EIR
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
SWAC – Agenda 10/23/18 Chapter 6 – Alternative Technology – Draft Findings 2. Chapter 7 – Draft Landfill Disposal Existing Disposal System Disposal Options.
I Street Bridge Replacement Project
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission
UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND ANNEXATION
UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND ANNEXATION
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

Final Environmental Impact Report Amendment of SMUD’s Sphere of Influence and SMUD Yolo Annexation April 5, 2006

Program Description Amendment of the Sphere of Influence for the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) Annexation by SMUD of the Cities of West Sacramento, Davis, and Woodland and Portions of Unincorporated Areas of Yolo County (approximately 212 square miles)

Purpose of the LAFCo Draft EIR The LAFCO Draft EIR was issued: To provide Sacramento LAFCo and the public with information regarding potentially significant effects of the proposed annexation on the environment To obtain comments from the general public, and federal, state, and local agencies on the Draft EIR

EIR Best Management Practices The EIR Program Description identifies and incorporates Best Management Practices (BMPs) to avoid and/or minimize the effects of the program on the environment BMPs generally relate to future electric facility construction if the annexation is approved and SMUD proceeds to serve portions of Yolo County

Program Components

Program Components Program Component No. 1 Amendment of SMUD’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) and SMUD’s proposed annexation Program Component No. 2 SMUD’s acquisition of PG&E facilities needed to serve the annexation area

Program Components Program Component No. 3 Memoranda of understanding or operating agreements between SMUD and local jurisdictions in the annexation area MOUs Regarding Benefits of Annexation and Revenue Neutrality City of Davis:          Approved March 21, 2006 City of Woodland:    Approved March 21, 2006 County of Yolo:        On April 4, 2006 agenda City of West Sac:     On April 5, 2006 consent agenda

Program Components Program Component No. 4 and No. 5 SMUD will reconstruct and modify certain transmission line facilities in Sacramento County Program Component No. 6 SMUD will construct a new 15-18 mile transmission line from its Elverta Substation to Yolo County north of Woodland. No route has been selected or rights-of-way acquired at this time. A study area was analyzed in the Draft EIR

Program Components Program Component No. 7 SMUD will construct a new electric substation in Yolo County near Roads 102 and 27 between Woodland and Davis. (Willow Slough Substation 1-3 acres). No site has been selected at this time. A study area was analyzed in the Draft EIR

Program Components 4-7 Woodland West Sacramento Davis

Program Components Program Component No. 8 SMUD will upgrade existing distribution electric facilities in the annexation area at locations to be determined Program Component No. 9 After SMUD connects the electric system within the annexation area to its existing system, SMUD will operate and maintain the electric system in the annexation area

Draft Environmental Impact Report Public Comment Period

Public Comment Period January 6, 2006 - February 21, 2006 Public Meetings Davis January 18, 2006 Yolo LAFCo January 23, 2006 Woodland January 25, 2006 West Sacramento January 26, 2006 Sacramento LAFCo February 1, 2006

Public Comment Summary Number of Written and Oral Comments PG&E 161 Coalition of California Utility Employees and Appendices 393 Local Jurisdictions 60 Individuals 17 5 Public Meetings 91 Sacramento LAFCo Commissioners 71 Other Organizations 16 Total 809      

Final Environmental Impact Report Conclusions

Areas of Discussion Aesthetics Agriculture Air Quality Biology Short-Term Construction Noise Growth Inducement Cumulative Impacts Mitigation Monitoring Plan Program Alternatives

Aesthetics The proposed transmission line from SMUD’s Elverta Substation to Woodland will likely encroach on views from County Roads 16 and 117, which are designated scenic roads on the Yolo County side of the Sacramento River No impact to Sacramento County Yolo County in its comments on the Draft EIR stated: “The County understands that this is the most feasible way to connect the proposed annexation area electric system to SMUD’s existing electric system” (Significant and Unavoidable)

Agriculture The transmission line and substation will occupy up to 3.75 acres of farmland in Yolo County and 0.75 acres of farmland in Sacramento County SMUD will be required to mitigate (1:1) the farmland acreage by entering into conservation mitigation banking agreements in Yolo and Sacramento County SMUD will mitigate converted agriculture acreage separate from permanently disturbed habitat mitigation acreage (Less than Significant)

Air Quality Particulate emissions from diesel-fueled vehicles: Short-term use of construction equipment to install program components SMUD ongoing Operation and Maintenance Activities (Approximately 20 trips/400 miles per day) Because of the region’s non-attainment status, incremental contributions are considered significant

Air Quality The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District in its comments on the Draft EIR stated: “…We do not expect a significant impact from diesel particulate emissions” The Yolo Solano Air Quality Management District in its comments on the Draft EIR stated: “…With incorporation of the following information, we consider the comprehensive air quality analysis complete” (Significant and Unavoidable)

Air Quality The Draft EIR Best Management Practices include mitigation measures for reducing the impact The Final EIR includes additional measures proposed during the public comment period that are practicable and feasible

Biology Temporary disturbance of potential habitat is estimated at up to 9 acres in Yolo County and up to 8.5 acres in Sacramento County. Permanent disturbance of potential habitat is estimated at up to 3.5 acres in Yolo County and up to 1.3 acres in Sacramento County. Actual acreage will be determined after site-specific studies

Biology SMUD will, to the maximum extent feasible, avoid impact to biological resources SMUD will restore temporarily disturbed habitat and mitigate (No Net Loss) the permanently disturbed acreage If SMUD is unable to avoid permanent impacts to habitat, SMUD will mitigate for permanently disturbed habitat. Mitigation for permanently disturbed habitat acreage will be separate from farmland mitigation acreage (Less than Significant)

Short-Term Construction Noise Short-term noise due due to construction equipment: Areas impacted will be primarily rural agricultural areas SMUD will have noise controls on equipment and limited construction hours (Short-Term Significant and Unavoidable)

Growth Inducement Projected electric system reliability and lower rates may attract new industrial and commercial customers to the annexation area The Yolo jurisdictions state in comments: -The economic development benefits of this possible growth is desired by the local jurisdictions, and; -The jurisdictions will be able to manage the potential growth within their planning process (Significant and Unavoidable)

Cumulative Impacts The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) “Blueprint”, under all scenarios, predicts significant growth and urbanization in the region Even if the smart growth “Blueprint” is followed by the region, there will be significant cumulative impacts from the proposed urbanization Although the Program’s contribution to this impact when compared to the regional growth is small, the EIR utilizes a conservative standard (Significant and Unavoidable)

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) includes the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and mitigation measures that were included in the EIR Program Description The MMRP also includes mitigation measures suggested by comments on the Draft EIR SMUD will be required to provide LAFCo and Yolo LAFCo with reports that provide the status of each Best Management Practice and Mitigation requirement imposed by LAFCo

Program Objectives

Program Objectives Provide electric service at rates that are lower than existing rates Improve customer satisfaction Improve the reliability of the electric system Local control by residents No financial cost or reduction in service to existing SMUD customers No material financial cost or reduction in service to remaining PG&E customers

Program Alternatives

Program Alternatives Alternatives that would potentially meet most of the Program objectives and Avoid or lessen the Program’s direct significant environmental effects while not adding new significant impacts

Program Alternatives Alternatives considered: No Program Annexation of one or two, but not all three Cities Joint Powers Authority (JPA) with CAISO service PG&E Upgraded/Improved Service Community Choice Aggregation SMUD Annexation with CAISO Service

SMUD Annexation with CAISO Service Program Alternatives SMUD Annexation with CAISO Service The environmental impacts of the CAISO Service Alternative would be less than the Program because the Woodland-Elverta Transmission Line would not be required When compared to the Program, the CAISO Service Alternative would: -Result in higher rates and lower economic benefits -Reduced reliability -Increased technical complexity and risk -Reduced local control

Preferred Alternative Consistent with LAFCo policies the Program as compared to the alternatives, including the No Program Alternative, provides the lowest cost and highest quality of service for the Annexation Territory

Questions and Comments