Early Decision Cell Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 9-15 (April 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spring 2009: Section 3 – lecture 2
Advertisements

Meiosis a special type of nuclear division which segregates one copy of each homologous chromosome into each new "gamete". reduces the number of sets of.
Alberts • Johnson • Lewis • Morgan • Raff • Roberts • Walter
Frequency of Nonallelic Homologous Recombination Is Correlated with Length of Homology: Evidence that Ectopic Synapsis Precedes Ectopic Crossing-Over 
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Recombination May 2, 2018.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 3-5 (January 2013)
Control of Crossing Over
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Holliday model Strand exchange and Heteroduplex DNA formation
Origin of Chromosomal Translocations in Lymphoid Cancer
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Chapter 15 Homologous and Site-Specific Recombination
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Recombination Mechanisms
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
The Single-End Invasion
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Thorsten Allers, Michael Lichten  Cell 
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis for a New Templated Activity by Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase: Implications for V(D)J Recombination  Jérôme Loc'h, Sandrine Rosario,
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Comprehensive, Fine-Scale Dissection of Homologous Recombination Outcomes at a Hot Spot in Mouse Meiosis  Francesca Cole, Scott Keeney, Maria Jasin  Molecular.
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (April 1997)
Somatic Hypermutation of Immunoglobulin Genes
Physical and Functional Interactions among Basic Chromosome Organizational Features Govern Early Steps of Meiotic Chiasma Formation  Yuval Blat, Reine.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
The Fuss about Mus81  James E Haber, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer  Cell 
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
The DNA Damage Machinery and Homologous Recombination Pathway Act Consecutively to Protect Human Telomeres  Ramiro E. Verdun, Jan Karlseder  Cell  Volume.
Intermediates of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Contain Heteroduplex DNA
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Fanconi Anemia (Cross)linked to DNA Repair
Avanti Kulkarni, David M. Wilson 
Simone E. Nunes-Düby, Marco A. Azaro, Arthur Landy  Current Biology 
DNA repair: Rad52 – the means to an end
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Homologous recombination
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Jill E. Falk, Andrew Chi-ho Chan, Eva Hoffmann, Andreas Hochwagen 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Mnd1 Is Required for Meiotic Interhomolog Repair
Allyson M Holmes, James E Haber  Cell 
Florence Couteau, Monique Zetka  Developmental Cell 
Penelope R Chua, G.Shirleen Roeder  Cell 
Rad52  Uffe H. Mortensen, Michael Lisby, Rodney Rothstein 
Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break- Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair  Anuja Mehta, Annette Beach,
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages R641-R645 (August 2008)
Recombination: Holliday Junction Resolution and Crossover Formation
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S
At Loose Ends: Resecting a Double-Strand Break
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Gene Amplification: Yeast Takes a Turn
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
The path of DNA in the kinetochore
Sex and the Single (Double-Strand) Break
Presentation transcript:

Early Decision Cell Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 9-15 (April 2004) Douglas K Bishop, Denise Zickler  Cell  Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 9-15 (April 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00297-1

Figure 1 Meiotic Chromosomes (A) Bivalent of Locusta with one chiasma (purple arrow). (B) Same picture with homologous chromosomes drawn in blue and red. (C) Cohesins maintain connections between sister chromatids on both sides of the chiasma, as manifested by the fact that axes are perfectly parallel (inferred position indicated by green lines). (D) Monochiasmate bivalent of Locusta after BrdU incorporation to differentially “stain” the sister chromatids and corresponding drawings (from Jones, 1987). The exchange site between white and black chromatids corresponds exactly with the chiasma (purple arrows); black and gray rectangles mark the centromere positions. (E) Recombination nodule (purple arrow) of Sordaria macrospora located on the central element of the SC. LE (in blue and red) indicates maternal and paternal lateral elements of the SC. (F) Localization of Zip2 by antibodies to Zip2p on a spread wild-type budding yeast nucleus. (G) Localization of Zip2p and axial/lateral element component Red1p in a zip1 mutant. Red1p (green) localizes on chromosome axis and Zip2p as foci (red/yellow) on SICs. note: (F) and (G) are from Chua and Roeder, 1998. (A) and (E) were previously unpublished (D. Zickler). Cell 2004 117, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00297-1)

Figure 2 The DSBR and ECD Models of Meiotic Recombination (A) The DSBR model. 3′ ends of DNA are indicated with a half arrowhead. Newly synthesized regions of DNA are indicated in red. The version of the model shown is modified from that originally proposed. The original model, that 5′ and 3′ ends were nucleolytically processed prior to invasion. Subsequent studies indicated that 3′ ends undergo little or no degradation. (a) A DNA double-strand break occurs and the 5′ strands at DNA ends are resected to yield 3′ ssDNA overhangs. (b) Strand invasion of both ends forms a D loop. (c) DNA synthesis from the invading ends fills in regions lost by end resection, ligation of extended strands forms two Holliday junctions. (d) Resolution of Holliday junctions forms CO and NCO recombination products. Alternative modes of resolution give rise to NCO (right) and CO (left) recombinants. (B) The Early Crossover Decision (ECD) Model. (a) DSB end forms an unstable (“nascent”) interaction with a homologous chromatid. (b) En route to forming an NCO, the end involved in the nascent interaction is extended by DNA synthesis. This intermediate is either unstable or too transient to detect by current 2D gel methods. (c) The extended end is ejected from the nascent joint. (d) The extended end anneals with its partner. (e) DNA synthesis and ligation completes formation of the NCO. (f) En route to forming a CO, the nascent end is stabilized to form an SEI intermediate that can be detected by 2D gels. (g) The second end engages the SEI via strand invasion or annealing. (h) DNA synthesis from the invading ends fills in regions lost by end resection, ligation of extended strands forms two Holliday junctions. (i) Resolution of Holliday junctions occurs such that only a CO is formed. Cell 2004 117, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00297-1)

Figure 3 Schematic of a Zygotene Chromosome The maternal sister chromatids are represented in red and orange, the paternal sisters in blue and purple. Chromatids are arranged as a set of loops along the lateral element (black). In the Presynaptically aligned region, loops emanate from the axes and can contact one another. The schematic is not meant to imply that loop contacts are responsible for establishing or maintaining the parallel configuration of lateral elements at the presynaptic stage; structures not depicted, such as proteinaceous bridges, may serve this function (reviewed in Zickler and Kleckner, 1999). In the SC portion, lateral elements are held in parallel alignment by the central region (green bars). Cell 2004 117, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00297-1)

Figure 4 Pre-SC Model for CO Designation and Interference (A) DSBs are formed on chromatin loops and engage in unstable/nascent interactions with corresponding sequences on the loop of a non-sister chromatid. (B) A subset of nascent interactions is designated to become a CO, setting up interference along the chromosome axis. CO designation is indicated by a pink box. Interference signals, indicated as red lines with double arrowheads, spread from sites of CO designation preventing nearby nascent interactions from acquiring their own CO designation. (C) ZMM-SIC (yellow circles) loads only at designated pre-COs. (D) Polymerization of the SC central region is initiated coupled with conversion of the nascent interaction to an SEI. Green bars represent components of the SC central region. (E) SC elongation occurs and SEIs are converted to double Holliday junctions. Nascent interactions that failed to obtain CO designation go on to form NCOs. Cell 2004 117, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00297-1)