DFS Contested Case Hearing Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
Advertisements

What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
PRETRIAL. Prosecutorial Review After arrest, prosecutor reviews case to decide what charges to make against arrestee Decide if there is enough evidence.
New Foreclosure Law in Maryland Presentation by the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation Friday, June 18, 2010.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
Fair Hearings Training Presented by University of Miami School of Law, Children & Youth Law Clinic, Caitlin Currie, Shana Schoem and Seida Wood.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Filing of Complaint Caparell & DiGregorio will file your complaint and related documents with the Plymouth Probate and Family Court which, in turn, assigns.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Starring: Ofelia Calderón, Esq. – Calderón Seguin, as Immigration Judge Ivan Yacub, Esq. – Yacub Law Offices, LLC as Private Immigration Counsel Edward.
THE REVIEW PROCESS. 2 OVERVIEW Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Request Departmental Review Review Process Documentation Conference Final Determination Other.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Adult Protective Services Basic Skills Training Presented by: Rajeev Premakumar Assistant Attorney General Public Assistance Section N.C. Department of.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Freedom of Information (General) Regulations, 2008 Natasha N. Bodden, LLB FOI Policy Analyst FOI Policy Analyst Freedom of Information Unit Cayman Islands.
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre - Internal procedures -
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
GOVERNMENT LAWYER’S REPRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES Craig E. Leen City Attorney City of Coral Gables *** With special thanks to Yaneris Figueroa,
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIAL ORIENTATION Florida Property Appraisers Florida Tax Collectors February 7-10, 2017.
Teresa Brown Open Records Supervisor Plano Police Department
Hot Topics: Ten Things You Need to Know
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Indiana Access to Public Records Act (APRA) Training
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Mason County School District
Wyoming Statutes §§ through
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Grievance Hearings and the Gomez vs Saenz Settlement
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
What to Expect at a Medicaid Fair Hearing
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Connections Abuse Prevention Plan 2018.
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
Civil Pretrial Practice
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Beth Engelking, Assistant Commissioner Adult Protective Services
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Student Data Privacy: National Trends and Wyoming’s Role
Discovery in TPR Cases and of DFS Records in Other Contexts
Initial Licensure Process, Survey Types & Licensure Action
Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act
Procedures for Reporting Child Abuse
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
Proposed Commission Rules Changes WCLA 10/20/16
What are a parent’s options when they and the school disagree?
Presentation transcript:

DFS Contested Case Hearing Process Wendy S. Ross, Esq., Senior Assistant Attorney General CJP Blog Talk April 17, 2019

DFS Investigation DFS must initiate an investigation or assessment within 24 hours of receiving a notification of suspected abuse or neglect (Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-3-204(a)(iii)) DFS must reject intakes where allegations do not meet the statutory definition of abuse or neglect and are not within the scope of Child Protective Services Once a referral is assigned to the investigation track, DFS must inform the alleged perpetrator, child(ren)/youth, and family in writing that a referral has been received and of DFS’s duty to investigate (DFS Child Protection Services Policy 1.3.3)

DFS Investigation Statement of Abuse/Neglect Allegations (SS-2) Should be sent to the alleged perpetrator within 7 calendar days of the initial interview Notice of Conclusions (SS-5) Should be sent to the alleged perpetrator within 7 calendar days of the conclusion of the investigation Timeline for Investigation Investigations should be completed within 6 months, can be extended with consent of District Manager

DFS Investigation Independent, administrative process Separate and apart from juvenile court process BUT the Department must substantiate a report where a court has accepted a criminal plea of guilty or nolo contender or a civil, juvenile, or criminal court has made a finding that the alleged perpetrator committed certain acts that constitute abuse or neglect (DFS CPS Rules, Chapter 2, Section 6(c)(ii)) Because it is a separate agency function, the juvenile court process (i.e., consent decree or stipulations) CANNOT require the Department to abstain from placing a perpetrator on the central registry

DFS Investigation Substantiation occurs when the Department determines that the information and evidence gathered constitutes a preponderance of evidence that the child(ren)/youth was abused or neglected Criteria: Maltreatment meets the definition of abuse or neglect; Perpetrator is a caretaker, meaning a person responsible for a child(ren)/youth’s welfare (See DFS CPS Rules, Chapter 1, Section 4 for definitions); and Supervisor and District Manager have reviewed the investigation report, concur with the finding, and the District Manager signs the Notice of Conclusions (SS-5)

DFS Investigation Unsubstantiation occurs where there is NOT a preponderance of evidence that abuse or neglect has occurred DFS may still offer services to the family even when the Department does not substantiate

Request for Hearing The SS-5 includes information about how the perpetrator can request a contested case (administrative) hearing A request must be made in writing, to the District Manager, within 20 days of the date of the Notice of Conclusions (for abuse/neglect cases – other timelines apply for different DFS agency actions) The request shall contain: Name, address, and telephone number of the person requesting the hearing Name and address of the requesting party’s legal counsel or representative (if the requesting party has retained counsel or a representative at the time the request for hearing is made)

Request for Hearing An alleged perpetrator is NOT entitled to a hearing if: The perpetrator has been convicted, adjudicated, or there is a finding by a civil, juvenile, or criminal court, or a consent decree, whether by a plea of guilty or nolo contender or a finding of guilt, that the alleged perpetrator committed certain acts that the child protective services defines as abuse or neglect (DFS CPS Rules, Chapter 2, Section 9(d))

Request for Hearing Informal Conference The Department local office which took action adverse to an individual shall schedule and conduct an informal conference within 7 days of receiving the request for hearing Purpose: to review facts and legal authority on which the Department relied in making the determination to take adverse action May be waived by party whose interests have been adversely affected

Hearing Process Representation Filing of papers All parties have a right to represent themselves, to be represented by a Wyoming-licensed attorney, or any other person chosen by the party to appear on their behalf If the individual requesting a hearing has a representative or is represented by an attorney payment of attorney’s fees and costs are the responsibility of the individual requesting a hearing The Department may be represented by the Attorney General’s Office Filing of papers DFS maintains the original file Copies of filed documents should be provided to all parties and the hearing officer

Hearing Process Time Period for Requests, Evaluation of Requests, and Hearing An alleged perpetrator has 20 days from date of mailing of SS-5 to request hearing, in writing The Director has 20 days from receipt of request for hearing to evaluate the request and notify the requesting party whether the Director has approved or denied the request for hearing A hearing on an abuse or neglect substantiation must be held within 90 days of the Department action giving rise to the complaint (SS-5) This can be waived by the requesting party, but hearing must be held within one year of the SS-5 date

Hearing Process Referral to the Office of Administrative Hearings Once the director approves the request for hearing, the Department refers the case to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) to conduct the hearing Referral is made through an OAH transmittal form

Hearing Process Scheduling Conference Once OAH receives the transmittal form and the accompanying documents, OAH will usually set a scheduling conference to set a hearing and other disclosure deadlines This sometimes does not occur if there are no attorneys involved Usually conducted by telephone

Hearing Process Discovery Rule 26 initial disclosure requirements do NOT apply to cases involving CPS substantiations (because they arise out of Title 14) Depositions and other discovery tools are available (Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 16-3-107(g)) WRCP Rules 37(b)(1) and 37(b)(2)(D) are specifically exempted from use in these actions

Hearing Process Settlement Options The Department has the discretion to informally resolve these matters through a settlement agreement Settlement agreement terms are usually identified to address the conduct that led to the substantiation A settlement agreement may specify that if a perpetrator completes the terms of the agreement, that will be considered good cause for removal from the central registry Settlement agreement terms must be approved by the State DFS office administrators in addition to the local office District Manager

Hearing Process Pre-Hearing Disclosures Much like a pretrial statement OAH will set a deadline for submission Must include: list of witnesses; statement of specific claims, defenses, and issues; statement of burden of proof; statement identifying any stipulated facts; complete list and copies of all documents, statements, etc. which may be introduced into evidence Failure to file a prehearing disclosure statement may result in the hearing officer’s striking of witnesses, exhibits, claims and defenses, or dismissal of the contested case

Hearing Process Pre-Hearing Conference May be held at the discretion of the hearing officer Any party may request a prehearing conference to address issues such as discovery, motion deadlines, scheduling orders, or status conferences Usually conducted by telephone

Hearing Process Hearing CPS hearings must be conducted in person in the county of origination If a party requesting a hearing fails to appear, the hearing officer may dismiss the case Evidence Rules of Evidence do NOT apply Privilege laws do apply and should be recognized by hearing officer Evidence of the type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their serious affairs is admissible Hearing officer may take administrative notice of judicially cognizable facts Hearing officer may ask questions of any party or witness

Hearing Process Hearing Burden of Proof Standard of Proof Is on the Department (in CPS cases) Standard of Proof Preponderance of evidence Recording of hearing The hearing officer shall record all contested case proceedings electronically, through the use of a qualified court reporter or any other appropriate means determined by the Department, or hearing officer, as approved by the Department

Hearing Process OAH Decision Appeals In CPS cases, the hearing officer must make findings of fact and conclusions of law within 20 working days of the close of the hearing for final determination May be extended 10 working days to allow for additional briefing For CPS cases, the OAH decision is a final decision For APS cases, the OAH decision is a recommended decision and the Director makes the final decision Appeals Can be made in accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 16-3-114 and WRAP Rule 12

Authorities and References Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 16-3-101 et seq.) Department of Family Services Child Protective Services Rules (www.rules.wyo.gov) Department of Family Services Contested Case Hearing Rules (www.rules.wyo.gov) Office of Administrative Hearings Contested Case Proceeding Rules (www.rules.wyo.gov) Department of Family Services Child Protective Services Policy (http://dfsweb.wyo.gov/social-services/policy/dfs-policy-manual) Department of Family Services Adult Protective Services Rules (www.rules.wyo.gov) Department of Family Services Adult Protective Services Policy Manual (http://dfsweb.wyo.gov/social-services/policy/adult-protective-services) Child Protective Services Act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 14-3-201et seq.) Adult Protective Services Act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 35-20-101 et seq.)