Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

A Second RNA-Binding Site in the NS1 Protein of Influenza B Virus
Structural Basis of Substrate Methylation and Inhibition of SMYD2
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Crystal Structure of the Vanadate-Inhibited Ca2+-ATPase
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
A Second RNA-Binding Site in the NS1 Protein of Influenza B Virus
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
A Second RNA-Binding Site in the NS1 Protein of Influenza B Virus
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Structural Basis for Ligand Recognition and Activation of RAGE
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 1167-1176 (July 2012) Crystal Structure of the Ternary Complex of a NaV C-Terminal Domain, a Fibroblast Growth Factor Homologous Factor, and Calmodulin  Chaojian Wang, Ben C. Chung, Haidun Yan, Seok-Yong Lee, Geoffrey S. Pitt  Structure  Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 1167-1176 (July 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.05.001 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Architecture of the Ternary Complex of the NaV CTD, FGF13, and CaM (A) Structure of the NaV1.5 CTD (green) in complex with FGF13 (yellow) and CaM (magenta). (B) Same as (A) but rotated 180°. (C) Zoomed-in view of the NaV CTD with the same orientation as (B). Secondary structural elements are labeled accordingly. See also Figures S1, S2, S3, and S4. Structure 2012 20, 1167-1176DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.05.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Interactions between NaV CTD and FGF13 (A) Surface representation of the ternary complex of the NaV CTD (green), FGF13 (yellow), and CaM (magenta). The interaction surfaces between the NaV1.5 CTD and FGF13 (within 4 Å each other) are colored gray. An electrostatic interaction that may be important is shown in red (see below). (B and C) The FGF13-interacting surface on the NaV1.5 CTD and the NaV1.5 CTD-interacting surface on FGF13, respectively. In each case, the highlighted molecule is rotated 90° from (A). Two electrostatic interacting pairs that may be important are shown in red (E1890 in NaV1.5 CTD and K14 in FGF13) and blue (R1898 in NaV1.5 CTD and Y98 in FGF13), respectively. (D and E) The electrostatic potential surface representations of (B) and (C), respectively. The potential was calculated from −5 kT (negatively charged amino acids) to 5 kT (positively charged amino acids) using the program Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS) (Baker et al., 2001). See also Figures S3, S4, and S5. Structure 2012 20, 1167-1176DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.05.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Specificity between the NaV1.5 CTD and FGF13 (A) Electrostatic interaction between NaV1.5 CTD (E1890) and FGF13 (K14). (B) Sequence alignment among NaV isoforms shows that Glu 1890 in NaV1.5 is conserved among other isoforms except NaV1.1. (C) Sample Isothermal titration calorimetry curves of FGF12B binding to Nav1.5 CTD. The total heat exchanged during each injection is fit to a binding isotherm with n, KD, and ΔHo as independent parameters. KD = 0.123 ± 0.002 μM, n = 1, and ΔHo = −4,835 ± 235 cal/mol for NaV1.5WT and FGF12B WT. KD = 2.37 ± 0.34 μM, n = 1.22 and ΔHo = −1,244 ± 181 cal/mol for NaV1.5WT and FGF12BK9E. KD = 5.04 ± 0.69 μM, n = 0.62, and ΔHo = −1,001 ± 312 cal/mol for NaV1.5E1890K and FGF12BWT. KD = 0.088 ± 0.025 μM, n = 0.98, and ΔHo = −2,746 ± 202 cal/mol for NaV1.5E1890K and FGF12BK9E. Results are means ± SEM with n = 3. (D) Coexpression and copurification experiment of wild-type and mutant NaV1.5 CTD and FGF12B shows restoration of interaction with a charge swap. (E) Exemplar currents from a two-pulse protocol (inset) to assess steady-state inactivation of NaV1.5 recorded in HEK293T cells. (F) Both the wild-type pair and the charge swap mutants show a rightward (depolarizing) shift. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and fit with Boltzman distributions (values for V1/2 are provided in Table 2). The n for each pair is indicated in parentheses. See also Figure S6. Structure 2012 20, 1167-1176DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.05.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interactions of NaV CTD with CaM and FGF13 (A) Zoomed-in view of the interactions of the NaV1.5 CTD (green) with the C-lobe of CaM (magenta) shown on the right. The ternary complex structure on the left is shown to help orient the figure on the right. The amino acids of the NaV1.5 CTD involved in interactions with CaM are labeled. (B) Zoomed-in view of the ternary interactions of the NaV1.5 CTD (green), FGF13 (yellow), and CaM (magenta). The structure of FGF13 obtained in the absence of binding partners (PDB ID: 3HBW) was colored brown, showing the structural change upon formation of the complex. Structure 2012 20, 1167-1176DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.05.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Anomalous Diffraction Studies of the CaM C-Lobe and NaV CTD Anomalous difference Fourier electron density maps of the CaM-C-lobe region from the crystals grown in the presence of EGTA (A) and grown in the absence of EGTA and soaked with 5 mM Ca2+ (B) are contoured at 3 σ and 3.5 σ, respectively. Side chains involved in Ca2+ coordination in the Ca2+-binding loops of EF hands as well as methionines are shown. (C) Anomalous difference Fourier electron density maps of the NaV1.5 CTD region from the same crystal as (B) contoured at 3.5 σ. See also Figures S5 and S7. Structure 2012 20, 1167-1176DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.05.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions