The 1. 6 Å Crystal Structure of E

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Xiao Tao, Zhiru Yang, Liang Tong  Structure 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
The structural basis for pyrophosphatase catalysis
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (September 2002)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Crystal structure of the ternary complex of 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene reductase from Magnaporthe grisea with NADPH and an active-site inhibitor  Arnold.
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Gregory J. Miller, James H. Hurley  Molecular Cell 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Presentation transcript:

The 1. 6 Å Crystal Structure of E The 1.6 Å Crystal Structure of E. coli Argininosuccinate Synthetase Suggests a Conformational Change during Catalysis  Christopher T. Lemke, P.Lynne Howell  Structure  Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1153-1164 (December 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9

Figure 1 The Argininosuccinate Synthetase Mechanism Step 1: The formation of activated citrulline-adenylate releases inorganic pyrophosphate. Step 2: Nucleophilic attack by the aspartate amino group forms argininosuccinate and releases AMP. Structure 2001 9, 1153-1164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9)

Figure 2 EAS Aspartate and Citrulline Binding Sites σA-weighted |Fo| − |Fc| omit map contoured at 3σ shows the citrulline (a) and aspartate (c) binding sites. Schematic representation of the interactions between the protein and either citrulline (b) or aspartate (d). Dashed lines represent interactions between atoms, with distances given in Å. Structure 2001 9, 1153-1164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9)

Figure 3 The EAS Monomer (a) Stereo view of the Cα trace of the EAS monomer with every 20th residue numbered. The three substrates are in stick representation. (b) Ribbon diagram of EAS monomer. (c) Topology diagram of the EAS monomer (generated by TOPS [53] with manual editing). In panels (b) and (c) the nucleotide binding and synthetase domains are colored in red and blue, respectively, the crossover from the nucleotide binding domain to the synthetase domain is in purple, and the multimerization tail is in green. In panel (b), residues corresponding to observed clinical mutations are colored in yellow. (d) Ribbon diagram of EAS monomer, with β sheets colored in orange and α helices in blue. The secondary-structure elements were defined with Swiss-PdbViewer [54] and are as follows: β1, T2–L4; β2, Q11–F17; α1, L21–Q32; β3, V36–N43; α2, D53–Y62; β4, N66–C72; α3, R73–C86; β5, N91–T93; β6, L96–Y98; α4, T101–D120; β7, N123–D127; α5, D135–T146; β8, Q151–K154; α6, T159–E164; α7, R168–C178; β9, S191–N195; β10, G198–E202; β11, E234–E241; β12, H244–N249; α8, D256–G268; β13, S275–R281; β14, A285–E292; α9, P294–G309; α10, E313–Q332; α11, S338–S353; β15, G357–R364; β16, D368–V375; α12, P397–M406; α13, R407–T424; β17, L426–S428; and β18, Q437–E439. (e) Primary-sequence alignment of E. coli and human AS. The sequences of all 35 reported species of AS were used for producing the alignment. Residues strictly conserved between the two species are represented in uppercase. Residues involved in modeled ATP, citrulline, and aspartate binding are colored red, blue, and green, respectively. The α helices and β sheets defined above are represented as blue cylinders and orange arrows, respectively. In all panels, N and C denote the N and C termini, respectively. Structure 2001 9, 1153-1164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9)

Figure 4 Stereo Ribbon Diagram Comparison of the EAS, Asparagine Synthetase, GMP Synthetase, and NAD+ Synthetase Nucleotide Binding Domain Structures Residues 10–180 of EAS are colored in blue, residues 228–349 and 384–440 of asparagine synthetase are colored in green, residues 229–337 and 368–392 of GMP synthetase are colored in red, and residues 40–199 of NAD+ synthetase are colored in yellow. AMP is modeled in stick form. N and C denote the N and C termini, respectively. Structure 2001 9, 1153-1164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9)

Figure 5 Comparison of Nucleotide Binding Domains Topology diagrams of lactate dehydrogenase (a), EAS (b), and NAD+ synthetase (c). Triangles and circles represent β sheets and α helices, respectively. In all panels, N and C denote the domain N and C termini, respectively. The topology of NAD+ synthetase is representative of the other N-type ATP pyrophosphatases. Structure 2001 9, 1153-1164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9)

Figure 6 Multimerization of EAS The EAS dimer (a) and tetramer (b–d). In panels (a)–(d), each monomer is depicted in a different color. In (a) the dimer is viewed such that the red monomer is in the same orientation as the monomers of Figure 3. The tetramer is illustrated schematically along each of the mutually perpendicular 2-fold axes (b–d). In panels e and f, only the secondary-structural elements of the synthetase domain are colored. The eight four-stranded antiparallel β sheets are colored as in panels (a)–(d), the α helices of the synthetase domain are colored in light blue, and the multimerization tail is colored in gray. Structure 2001 9, 1153-1164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9)

Figure 7 Modeling of ATP (a) Model of ATP binding to EAS. Dashed lines represent potential hydrogen bonds/salt bridges. (b) The relative positions of the three substrates bound to EAS. The distance between the ureido oxygen of citrulline and the α-phosphate of ATP is shown as a dotted line. Structure 2001 9, 1153-1164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00683-9)