Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
JNK1 Phosphorylation of Cdt1 Inhibits Recruitment of HBO1 Histone Acetylase and Blocks Replication Licensing in Response to Stress  Benoit Miotto, Kevin.
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Induction of Somatic Hypermutation Is Associated with Modifications in Immunoglobulin Variable Region Chromatin  Caroline J. Woo, Alberto Martin, Matthew.
LPS induces CD40 gene expression through the activation of NF-κB and STAT-1α in macrophages and microglia by Hongwei Qin, Cynthia A. Wilson, Sun Jung Lee,
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Tomoyasu Hattori, Lukasz Stawski, Sashidhar S
Induction of Somatic Hypermutation Is Associated with Modifications in Immunoglobulin Variable Region Chromatin  Caroline J. Woo, Alberto Martin, Matthew.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Epigenetic Silencing of the p16INK4a Tumor Suppressor Is Associated with Loss of CTCF Binding and a Chromatin Boundary  Michael Witcher, Beverly M. Emerson 
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Antonin Morillon, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Anitha Nair, Jane Mellor 
Histone deacetylase 1 protein depletion affects general histone acetylation and specific gene expression. Histone deacetylase 1 protein depletion affects.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
NAD+-Dependent Modulation of Chromatin Structure and Transcription by Nucleosome Binding Properties of PARP-1  Mi Young Kim, Steven Mauro, Nicolas Gévry,
C-Jun Downregulation by HDAC3-Dependent Transcriptional Repression Promotes Osmotic Stress-Induced Cell Apoptosis  Yan Xia, Ji Wang, Ta-Jen Liu, W.K.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (November 2004)
Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 
Spatial and Temporal Recruitment of Androgen Receptor and Its Coactivators Involves Chromosomal Looping and Polymerase Tracking  Qianben Wang, Jason S.
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
P53 Functions through Stress- and Promoter-Specific Recruitment of Transcription Initiation Components before and after DNA Damage  Joaquı́n M Espinosa,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Robin M. Ricke, Anja-Katrin Bielinsky  Molecular Cell 
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Pantelis Hatzis, Iannis Talianidis  Molecular Cell 
Yongfeng Shang, Xiao Hu, James DiRenzo, Mitchell A Lazar, Myles Brown 
Formation of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Feng Xu, Kangling Zhang, Michael Grunstein  Cell 
Rb Interacts with Histone Deacetylase to Repress Transcription
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (November 2002)
CREB1 binds at the proximal region of the TGFB2 promoter and induces its transcriptional activation. CREB1 binds at the proximal region of the TGFB2 promoter.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages 751-763 (December 2003) Estrogen Receptor-α Directs Ordered, Cyclical, and Combinatorial Recruitment of Cofactors on a Natural Target Promoter  Raphaël Métivier, Graziella Penot, Michael R Hübner, George Reid, Heike Brand, Martin Koš, Frank Gannon  Cell  Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages 751-763 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6

Figure 1 In Vivo Identification of the Transcription Factors Involved in pS2 Gene Activity (A) The expression of the pS2 gene was monitored by real-time PCR on reverse-transcribed mRNA from hERα positive (MCF-7) or negative (MDA-MB231) cells or MDA-MB231 cells stably expressing hERα. After 52 hours of culture in stripped-media, cells were treated for 3 hr with 10 nM Estradiol (E2) or ethanol (EtOH) as vehicle control. The pS2 mRNA levels were normalized against invariant GAPDH mRNA, as measured by real-time PCRs. (B) Chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP) determining the recruitment of hERα, Phosphorylated Pol II (P-Pol II) and acetylated histones (Ac-Hist) to the pS2 promoter after 3 hr treatment with 10 nM E2 or EtOH. (C) ChIP experiments performed using chromatin prepared from untreated or 2 hr 10 nM E2-treated cells, quantified by real-time PCR (values in the right hand image). Cell 2003 115, 751-763DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6)

Figure 2 Re-ChIP Screening of the Factors Recruited to the pS2 Promoter (A) Chromatin prepared from cells treated for 3 hr with 10 nM Estradiol (E2) was subjected to the ChIP procedure with the antibodies shown at the left side, and again immunoprecipitated using antibodies shown at the top of the image. (B) Scheme illustrating the complexes indicated through the comprehensive Re-ChIP analysis of transcription factors on the pS2 promoter. Cell 2003 115, 751-763DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6)

Figure 3 Dynamics of Cofactor Recruitment Directed by E2-Liganded hERα on the pS2 Promoter Kinetic ChIP experiments were performed using specified antibodies as shown within the images. After 2 hr treatment with 2.5 μM α-amanitin, cells were washed and placed in media supplemented with 2.5% dextran-charcoal treated FCS including 10 nM Estradiol (E2). Then, chromatin was prepared on sampled cells at 5 minutes intervals. The amount of immunoprecipitated pS2 promoter was quantified by real-time PCR. Values, expressed as % of the inputs, are the mean of three separate experiments, and have a SD < 2%. All ChIP were performed from a single chromatin preparation for each time point. Cell 2003 115, 751-763DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6)

Figure 4 Events Directed by Liganded hERα on the pS2 Promoter that Results in Activation of Pol II (A, B, and C) Kinetic ChIP experiments with 1 minute scale sampling. All ChIPs were performed from a single chromatin preparation at each time point. Results are expressed as in Figure 2. (D to G) Depiction of protein engagement that occurs on the pS2 promoter, during the first transcriptionally unproductive cycle (D), at the commencement of the following cycles (E and F), and the protein recruitments common to the cycles illustrated in C and E (G). Cell 2003 115, 751-763DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6)

Figure 5 Recruitment of “Repressive Complexes,” hsp and Proteasome Subunits on Active pS2 Promoter (A) ChIP assays performed on chromatin prepared from cells treated with 10 nM Estradiol (E2) for 3 hr. (B) Re-ChIP analysis: Chromatin prepared from cells treated for 3 hr with 10 nM E2 was subject to ChIP with antibodies shown at the left side, and then purified complexes were again subject to ChIP using antibodies shown at the top of the image. (C) Kinetic ChIP experiments on chromatin prepared from cells after α-amanitin treatment and following 10 nM E2 treatment. Results are expressed as in Figure 2. (D) ChIP assays performed on chromatin prepared from α-amanitin synchronized cells after 80 minutes of 10 nM E2 or E2 + DRB treatment. (E and F) Summary of events that achieve clearance of the pS2 promoter. Cell 2003 115, 751-763DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6)

Figure 6 Dynamic Nucleosomal Positioning on the pS2 Promoter (A) Location of nucleosomes of the pS2 promoter, organized around the ERE (NucE) and the TATA box (NucT), as identified by Sewack and Hansen (1997). Primer pairs used to amplify specific pS2 promoter regions are indicated. (B) 5 × 105 MCF-7 cells were subject to DNA digestion with increasing amounts (0 to 10 U) of micrococcal nuclease (MNase). The asterisk points to the mononucleosome band. (C) Mononucleosomes were prepared from MCF-7 cells synchronized by α-amanitin treatment, and treated with 10 nM estradiol (E2). The nucleosome protected DNA fragments were then amplified by PCR using the A to J primer pairs illustrated. Absence of amplification with the B and D primer pairs determined that MNase digestion had occurred. (D) Scheme summarizing dynamic histone modification and nucleosomal position within the pS2 promoter during hERα induced cycles. Dashed lines in the nucleosomes reflect the increased accessibility of the TATA and ERE surrounding regions for digestion by MNase. Cell 2003 115, 751-763DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6)

Figure 7 Model This scheme summarizes our results reported here and in our previous report (Reid et al., 2003) for the three different, but linked, transcriptional cycles we determined. The left side shows events directed by E2-bound hERα during the initial nonproductive cycle. The right image illustrates the two alternating productive cycles. For full description, see the Discussion section. Cell 2003 115, 751-763DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00934-6)