Bob Goldstein, Linda M. Frisse, W.Kelley Thomas  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 General Phylogenetics Points that will be covered in this presentation Tree TerminologyTree Terminology General Points About Phylogenetic TreesGeneral.
Advertisements

Classification and phylogeny
Bell Work Dogs of a certain breed can have black fur or white fur. Black fur is dominant, but the breeder only wants puppies with white fur. Cross two.
Chapter 2 Opener How do we classify organisms?. Figure 2.1 Tracing the path of evolution to Homo sapiens from the universal ancestor of all life.
 Read Chapter 4.  All living organisms are related to each other having descended from common ancestors.  Understanding the evolutionary relationships.
PHYLOGENY and SYSTEMATICS CHAPTER 25. VOCABULARY Phylogeny – evolutionary history of a species or related species Systematics – study of biological diversity.
Ayesha M.Khan Spring Phylogenetic Basics 2 One central field in biology is to infer the relation between species. Do they possess a common ancestor?
Meiosis and Sexual Life Cycles. A life cycle is the generation-to- generation sequence of stages in the reproductive history of an organism it starts.
Section 2: Modern Systematics
Fig. 1. — The life cycle of S. papillosus. (A) The life cycle of S
Section 2: Modern Systematics
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Colponemids Represent Multiple Ancient Alveolate Lineages
Evidence for an Upper Limit to Mitotic Spindle Length
Loss of Function of MULTICOPY SUPPRESSOR OF IRA 1 Produces Nonviable Parthenogenetic Embryos in Arabidopsis  Anne-Elisabeth Guitton, Frédéric Berger 
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
Jianbin Wang, Julianne Garrey, Richard E. Davis  Current Biology 
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
The TBP-like Factor CeTLF Is Required to Activate RNA Polymerase II Transcription during C. elegans Embryogenesis  Linda Kaltenbach, Michael A. Horner,
Embracing Uncertainty in Reconstructing Early Animal Evolution
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (March 2014)
Reading Phylogenetic Trees
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1995)
Primate evolution — in and out of Africa
Yuki Hara, Akatsuki Kimura  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 18, Pages (September 2006)
Phenotypic Plasticity: Different Teeth for Different Feasts
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Hox Gene Loss during Dynamic Evolution of the Nematode Cluster
Development: The Maternal–Zygotic Transition Revisited
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Morphological Phylogenetics in the Genomic Age
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (February 2015)
Guillaume Halet, John Carroll  Developmental Cell 
Species patterns: Evolution's competitive edge
Gradual Assembly of Avian Body Plan Culminated in Rapid Rates of Evolution across the Dinosaur-Bird Transition  Stephen L. Brusatte, Graeme T. Lloyd,
Myosin 2-Induced Mitotic Rounding Enables Columnar Epithelial Cells to Interpret Cortical Spindle Positioning Cues  Soline Chanet, Rishabh Sharan, Zia.
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
A Comparative Analysis of Spindle Morphometrics across Metazoans
Sophie Louvet-Vallée, Stéphanie Vinot, Bernard Maro  Current Biology 
Naohito Takatori, Gaku Kumano, Hidetoshi Saiga, Hiroki Nishida 
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (May 2014)
P granules Current Biology
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Mammalian phylogeny: Genes and supertrees
Reconstructing the Evolution of Laughter in Great Apes and Humans
Cetaceans on a Molecular Fast Track to Ultrasonic Hearing
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Cortical Flows Powered by Asymmetrical Contraction Transport PAR Proteins to Establish and Maintain Anterior-Posterior Polarity in the Early C. elegans.
Cleavage Plane Specification in C. elegans: How to Divide the Spoils
An Alternative Root for the Eukaryote Tree of Life
Pushing Back the Expansion of Introns in Animal Genomes
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Colponemids Represent Multiple Ancient Alveolate Lineages
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Rapid Evolution of the Cerebellum in Humans and Other Great Apes
Asymmetric Segregation of PIE-1 in C
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
An Extended Signal Involved in Eukaryotic −1 Frameshifting Operates through Modification of the E Site tRNA  Michaël Bekaert, Jean-Pierre Rousset  Molecular.
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum ... Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the.
CDC-42 controls early cell polarity and spindle orientation in C
1 2 Biology Warm Up Day 6 Turn phones in the baskets
Presentation transcript:

Embryonic axis specification in nematodes: evolution of the first step in development  Bob Goldstein, Linda M. Frisse, W.Kelley Thomas  Current Biology  Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 157-160 (January 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70062-4

Figure 1 Microtubule distribution in Acrobeloides embryos, confocal sections of immunostained [3] embryos. (a) Soon after meiosis. (b) After the pronuclei have met. The inset is a confocal section of the cortex, showing that microtubules in the cortex are in the form of a network. Microtubules become enriched in the cortex during pronuclear migration. (c) Two-cell stage. Current Biology 1998 8, 157-160DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70062-4)

Figure 2 Asymmetric redistribution of P granules occurs during pronuclear migration in C. elegans (left), and during anaphase in Acrobeloides (right). Stages shown for both species are (a) soon after meiosis, (b) after the pronuclei have met, (c) metaphase, (d) anaphase, and (e) two-cell stage. AB and P1 are the names of the cells at the two-cell stage. C. elegans pictures are derived from a film of a single embryo (by permission of S. Hird). Acrobeloides pictures are confocal sections of fixed, immunostained [3] embryos. Current Biology 1998 8, 157-160DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70062-4)

Figure 3 Mechanisms for axis specification mapped onto a nematode molecular phylogeny. Species with no visible cytoplasmic rearrangement before first cleavage are drawn in blue; those with the rearrangement are in black. The top clade of ten species represents the suborder Rhabditina, the next clade of eight species (in blue) represents the suborder Cephalobina. We have not excluded the possibility that members of the Cephalobina actually use diverse mechanisms, which all differ from the C. elegans-type mechanism. The phylogeny was determined for the 20 taxa in which developmental mechanism can be assigned and 18S sequence data is also available. Character states were reconstructed on the phylogeny by parsimony. Plectus was used as an outgroup based on larger-scale phylogenetic analysis [5]. Sequences for P. minimus (GenBank accession no. U61578), C. oryzae (AF034390), Acrobeloides sp. PS1146 (AF03439), Acrobeloides sp. PS1156 (U81576), O. myriophila (U81588) and M. incognita (U81578) were determined as in [5]. The C. remanei sequence was from [10]. The remaining sequences are from [5]. The 18S sequence from Ascaris suum[11] was used in place of Parascaris equorum as these two species are sister taxa among eight species of ascaridoid nematodes [11]; a cytoplasmic rearrangement has been observed in Parascaris before first cleavage [12]. Bootstrap values for the relevant branches are based on maximum parsimony (top) and neighbor joining (bottom) analyses. The Cephalobina consist of two distinct groups by 18S sequence, with Panagrolaimus and Panagrellus (family Panagrolaimidae) in one group, and the other five species (family Cephalobidae) in the other. Morphological and molecular evidence supports the monophyly of these two groups, suggesting that the Acrobeloides-type mechanism is derived and arose once. However, we cannot significantly rule out one other possibility –the existence of two separate clades representing the two families, both branching basally to the Rhabditina: bootstrap percentages at the asterisk are 54/57. Such a result would suggest that the Acrobeloides-type mechanism is derived twice. Current Biology 1998 8, 157-160DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70062-4)