Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages e3 (November 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Key Interactions for Clathrin Coat Stability
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
The Bacterial Cytoskeleton
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
John D. Leonard, Geeta J. Narlikar  Molecular Cell 
Enhanced Depolymerization of Actin Filaments by ADF/Cofilin and Monomer Funneling by Capping Protein Cooperate to Accelerate Barbed-End Growth  Shashank.
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Botulinum Toxins A and E Inflict Dynamic Destabilization on t-SNARE to Impair SNARE Assembly and Membrane Fusion  Ryan Khounlo, Jaewook Kim, Linxiang.
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Kumaran S. Ramamurthi, Richard Losick  Molecular Cell 
Homeostatic Cell Growth Is Accomplished Mechanically through Membrane Tension Inhibition of Cell-Wall Synthesis  Enrique R. Rojas, Kerwyn Casey Huang,
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Susanne Bechstedt, Gary J. Brouhard  Developmental Cell 
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Cell Size-Based Decision-Making of a Viral Gene Circuit
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
V.P. Ivanova, I.M. Makarov, T.E. Schäffer, T. Heimburg 
Volume 109, Issue 10, Pages (November 2015)
Structure of Yeast OSBP-Related Protein Osh1 Reveals Key Determinants for Lipid Transport and Protein Targeting at the Nucleus-Vacuole Junction  Mohammad.
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Diverse Pore Loops of the AAA+ ClpX Machine Mediate Unassisted and Adaptor- Dependent Recognition of ssrA-Tagged Substrates  Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker,
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Effects of Receptor Interaction in Bacterial Chemotaxis
J.P. Junker, K. Hell, M. Schlierf, W. Neupert, M. Rief 
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Teemu P. Miettinen, Mikael Björklund  Cell Reports 
Conformational Activation of Argonaute by Distinct yet Coordinated Actions of the Hsp70 and Hsp90 Chaperone Systems  Kotaro Tsuboyama, Hisashi Tadakuma,
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e4 (January 2019)
Positive and Negative Control of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions by Other DNA Loops Generates Specificity and Tunability  Nan Hao, Keith E. Shearwin, Ian.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Susanne Bechstedt, Kevan Lu, Gary J. Brouhard  Current Biology 
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Cotranslational Folding Increases GFP Folding Yield
A Delocalized Proton-Binding Site within a Membrane Protein
Joshua S. Weinger, Minhua Qiu, Ge Yang, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 518-526.e3 (November 2017) Dash-and-Recruit Mechanism Drives Membrane Curvature Recognition by the Small Bacterial Protein SpoVM  Edward Y. Kim, Erin R. Tyndall, Kerwyn Casey Huang, Fang Tian, Kumaran S. Ramamurthi  Cell Systems  Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 518-526.e3 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.10.004 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Cell Systems 2017 5, 518-526.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.10.004) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Preferential In Vitro Adsorption of SpoVM-FITC onto More Positively Curved Membranes Using a Flow Cytometry-Based Assay (A) Schematic of sporulating B. subtilis showing the mother cell (MC) and forespore (FS). Membranes are shown in yellow and cell wall in gray; site of SpoVM localization on the forespore is depicted in green. (B and C) Fluorescence micrographs of sporulating B. subtilis cells (strain CVO1195) producing SpoVM-GFP; (B) GFP fluorescence and (C) overlay of GFP fluorescence and DIC image. Strain genotypes are listed in the STAR Methods. (D) Adsorbance of SpoVM-FITC onto differently curved membranes in vitro. Fluorescence intensities (MESF, molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome) were measured using flow cytometry at varying concentrations of SpoVM-FITC incubated with a mixed population of 2- (blue) and 8-μm (red) SSLBs. Insets: magnification of the initial part of the binding curve highlighted by dashed box. Data were fit with an allosteric sigmoidal model. (E–J) Association kinetics of SpoVM-FITC onto differently curved membranes. Mixture of 2- (blue) and 8-μm (red) SSLBs incubated with (E) 1 μM, (F) 2 μM, or (G) 3 μM SpoVM-FITC. Fluorescence intensity associated with SSLBs was measured at times indicated using flow cytometry. (H–J) Magnification of the initial part of the adsorption curves in (E–G), respectively, indicated by dashed box. Data were fit with a one-phase association model. Data points and error bars represent mean values and SD respectively, from three independent replicates. (K and L) Monte Carlo simulations predict that a faster on rate coupled to mild cooperativity is sufficient to recapitulate experimental binding kinetics. In the simulations, SpoVM molecules in solution can bind to surfaces representing 2- and 8-μm SSLBs at equal total surface area, with on rates k2 and k8, respectively, in the absence of other molecules bound at nearby sites (STAR Methods). The on rate is enhanced on all surfaces by exp(Ec/kBT) for each neighboring binding site containing a SpoVM molecule. The off rate is the same for both surfaces. (K) Across a wide range of values of the total number of SpoVM molecules (N) and the cooperativity energy Ec, the normalized steady-state binding was computed with k8/k2 = 0.5 and regions of parameter space (magenta) were identified that were consistent with our experimental data (within 1 SD of the mean) on 2- and 8-μm SSLBs for simulations with N, 2N, and 3N molecules to mimic 1, 2, and 3 μM SpoVM concentrations. The orange rectangle denotes parameters for which simulations agreed with our experimental data for both SSLB sizes and across the 3-fold concentration range. (L) Simulations of binding kinetics (thick lines) using one of the parameter sets within the orange rectangle (Ec = 0.5kBT, N = 76,800) displayed excellent agreement with our experimental data (thin lines, error bars represent 1 SD). Blue and red lines represent 2- and 8-μm SSLBs, respectively. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Systems 2017 5, 518-526.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.10.004) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 An Unstructured N Terminus Is Required for Proper Localization of SpoVM In Vivo and In Vitro (A) NMR structures of SpoVM and SpoVMP9A (PDB: 2MVH and 2MVJ, respectively). (B–J) Fluorescence micrographs of sporulating B. subtilis cells producing SpoVM-GFP (B) (strain CVO1195), SpoVMP9A, (C) (CVO1395), SpoVMP9G-GFP, (D) (EYKS904), SpoVMK7P,P9A-GFP (E) (EYKS869), SpoVML8P,P9A-GFP (F) (EYKS870), SpoVMP9A,K10P-GFP (G) (EYKS871), SpoVMP9A,F11P-GFP (H) (EYKS872), SpoVMP9A,L12P-GFP (I) (EYKS873), or SpoVMP9A,G13P-GFP (J) (EYKS874). (K–O) Adsorbance of SpoVM-FITC variants, as measured by flow cytometry, onto differently curved membranes in vitro. Fluorescence intensities were measured using flow cytometry for (K) SpoVMP9A-FITC, (L) SpoVMP9G-FITC, (M) SpoVML8P,P9A-FITC, (N) SpoVMP9A,K10P-FITC, or (O) SpoVMP9A,F11P-FITC at varying concentrations incubated with a mixed population of 2- (blue) and 8-μm (red) SSLBs. Data points and error bars represent mean values and SD respectively, from three independent replicates. (P) Schematic of sporulating B. subtilis and representative line scans across the mother cell (blue) and forespore (orange) membranes. (Q) Ratio of mother cell to forespore membrane maximum fluorescence intensities from line scans as shown in (P) in sporulating B. subtilis cells producing the indicated SpoVM-GFP variants. ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 compared with SpoVMP9A. See also Figure S3. (R) 13Cα secondary chemical shifts for residues 3–14 of SpoVM and variants are shown. Similar 13Cα secondary shifts of N-terminal residues of SpoVMP9A and SpoVMK7P,P9A (red and orange, respectively) indicate their structured nature. Conversely, the 13Cα secondary shifts of SpoVMP9G and SpoVMP9A,K10P (fluorescent and light green, respectively) reflect their unstructured N terminus, similar to the wild-type protein (dark green). Additional supports by NMR NOESY and circular dichroism are shown in Figures S4 and S5. Cell Systems 2017 5, 518-526.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.10.004) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Proper Localization of GFP-SpoIVA In Vivo Requires Properly Localized SpoVM (A–H) Localization of GFP-SpoIVA in sporulating B. subtilis cells in the presence (A) (strain KR165) or absence (B) (KR178) of SpoVM, or in the presence of SpoVMP9A (C) (SE50), SpoVMK7P,P9A (D) (EYKS919), SpoVML8P,P9A (E) (EYKS920), SpoVMP9A,K10P (F) (EYKS892), SpoVMP9A,F11P (G) (EYKS893), or SpoVMP9G (H) (EYKS929). (A′–H′) Overlay of GFP fluorescence (green) and membranes (red) visualized with fluorescent dye FM4-64 from panels (A–H), respectively. Fraction of cells displaying the indicated localization pattern is shown to the right (n > 55 cells for each). (I) Model for the affinity/cooperativity-driven localization of SpoVM onto positively curved membranes. Left: depiction of sporulating B. subtilis in which SpoVM molecules (blue) synthesized in the mother cell (MC) adsorb onto the convex membrane surface (yellow) of the forespore (FS). Center: unordered SpoVM molecule (blue, upper left) has a higher intrinsic affinity for the convex forespore surface (thick red arrow). Higher affinity is mediated by a faster on rate, which is composed of three steps: initial binding, protein folding, and membrane insertion. We propose that folding and/or insertion occur more quickly on membranes of preferred curvature. Right: successful insertion of the first SpoVM molecule positively influences the subsequent insertion of other SpoVM molecules, mediated by direct protein-protein interaction and/or entropic clustering. Cell Systems 2017 5, 518-526.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.10.004) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions