Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Citizens Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 Anna Compton USACE 1.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Review of Scenario Builder BMP crediting Christopher F. Brosch University of Maryland Extension Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Support System Management Actions Watershed Model Bay Model Criteria Assessment Procedures Effects Allocations Airshed.
Ecosystem Based Modeling for Sustainable Regional Development of the Marine and Estuarine Resources in Coastal NSW Philip Gibbs Karen Astles.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
Chesapeake Bay Program
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
EVALUATING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT APPROACHES IN THE LAKE ERIE BASIN AND KEY LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE LAKE ERIE WATERSHED Ohio Stormwater.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Plant Nutrients Diego and lorenzo.
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Local Planning Process…
Watershed Implementation Plan
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
Commonwealth of Virginia
We often celebrate trees…
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools December 19, 2017

What is a model? Scenarios, or model simulations, estimate how various changes or actions could affect an ecosystem (water quality, wildlife, aquatic life). Model simulations, when combined with research and observations, provide best estimates based on the most up-to-date and corroborative science and data.  Although model simulations are an important part of the Chesapeake Bay restoration effort, they are not considered to be perfect forecasts. Rather, simulations are best estimates based on state-of-the-art, extensively peer-reviewed science. Modeling is part of a broader toolkit that includes research and monitoring to gain the highest possible level of accuracy.

Why use a model for the Chesapeake Bay? The Chesapeake Bay watershed and airshed are large and complex. Scientists and decision makers rely on computer model simulations to see how efforts to reduce pollution affect water quality, wildlife and aquatic life. Plays a key role in understanding and managing nutrient and sediment pollution. Image: Chickies Rock County Park in Columbia, PA, by Steve Droter, Chesapeake Bay Program (accessed from www.chesapeakebay.net)

The Chesapeake Bay Partnership Applies state-of-the-art models of land use, the watershed, the airshed and the tidal Bay that are extensively peer-reviewed by the science community.  Accuracy and success of the models depend on the quality of data inputs, requiring partnerships with stakeholders. Image from meetings image page on www.chesapeakebay.net

Chesapeake Bay Program Models Suite of computer models that are among the most sophisticated, studied and respected in the world. Links to a variety of Bay-related models, data sources and other resources Provides a comprehensive view of the Bay ecosystem, from the depths of the Bay to the upper reaches of the watershed, from land to air. Can be used to determine what pollution control measures should be implemented.

Land Use Change Model Analyzes and forecasts the effects of urban land use and population on sewer and septic systems. Forecasts are based on: Reported changes from the U.S. Census Bureau in housing, population and migration Sewer service areas County-level population projections Land cover trends (including the conversion of forests and farmland to development) derived from analysis of high-resolution land cover data and satellite imagery. Information is input into the Watershed and Estuary Models.

Airshed Model Uses information about nitrogen emissions from power plants, vehicles and other sources to estimate the amount and location where reactive nitrogen oxides and ammonia are deposited. National model run by the Environmental Protection Agency. Information is input into the Watershed and Estuary Models.

Phase 6 Watershed Model Estimates amount and origin of nutrients and sediment reaching the Bay. Divides the Bay into more than 2,000 segments delineating political and physical boundaries. Can be used at smaller scales for state- developed TMDLs.  Helps connect monitoring data and the planning and implementation of restoration practices. Past, present and future simulations help to evaluate management actions and alternatives. Incorporates information about land use, fertilizer applications, wastewater plant discharges, septic systems, air deposition, farm animal populations, management practices, watershed characteristics, stream characteristics, weather and other variables to estimate the amount of nutrients and sediment reaching the Chesapeake Bay and where these pollutants originate. TMDLs are total maximum daily loads (may need to define this term, depending on the audience) Built through a collaborative process through Chesapeake Bay Program partnership, which directed a development team made up of federal, academic, nonprofit and contractor staff. Uses multiple models and lines of evidence to estimate the delivery of nutrients and sediment to the Bay.

Estuary Model Also called the Water Quality and Sediment Transport Model. Examines the effects that pollution loads generated by the Watershed Model and Airshed Model have on water quality in the tidal waters of the Bay. Examines model estimates of dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll a and water clarity to assess the protections of living resources (fish, shellfish, other invertebrates, submerged aquatic vegetation). The Chesapeake 2000 Agreement included commitments for adopting living resource-based water quality standards that would be protective of fish, shellfish, other invertebrates, and SAV. Dissolved oxygen, water clarity, and chlorophyll a criteria were determined and guidance was published based on protection for Chesapeake Bay living resources. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/documents/Deriving_Chesapeake_Water_Quality_Standards_10-13.pdf

Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools

How do models determine pollution loads? Built on current land use (e.g., forests, farms, developed) and determined by satellite imagery and U.S. Department of Agriculture Census of Agriculture. Further refined by land management features (e.g., cover crops on farm fields, stormwater controls in urban areas). Use of regional models to help pinpoint the types and amounts of pollution that run off due to a particular land use.

How do models determine pollution loads? (continued) Pollution loads are cross-checked with recent research and studies. Outputs include observed data and measureable features of the landscape. Loads are further adjusted based on in-stream monitoring data Simulations of the past, coupled with conservation practices, management actions and pollution controls help estimate current reductions. The types and amounts of pollution that run off a particular land use are based on comprehensive reviews of the latest scientific literature. For example, the pollution loads incorporated into the Watershed Model are based on research from more than 100 academic papers. This comprehensive literature review provides the average pollution loads that various land uses contribute. In-stream monitoring data increases land use and location accuracy.

Web-based models The suite of modeling tools are available online as the Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool, or CAST. Estuary and Airshed models are also open and free for anyone to use. Virginia and Maryland have their own web-based modeling tool based on the Watershed Model Virginia Assessment Modeling Tool (VAST) Maryland Assessment Modeling Tool (MAST) Chesapeake Bay Facility Assessment Scenario Tool, or BayFAST, is a web-based version of the suite of modeling tools that is geared toward federal facilities. It is recommended that only those that have familiarity and knowledge of how these models work use them. Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool (CAST): https://cast.chesapeakebay.net Chesapeake Bay Facility Assessment Scenario Tool (BayFAST): http://www.bayfast.org/default.aspx?AcceptsCookies=yes

New features of the Phase 6 Watershed Model Easier to work with and understand. Contains almost double the amount of data. Uses high-resolution land cover data (1 meter by 1 meter resolution), providing 900 times the amount of information. Brings more scientific and partnership input than ever before. Includes new science, new data and new inputs from the agriculture community, including those from industries not previously involved. Most recent version of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model – replaces version 5.3.2 which was used to set the 2011 planning targets and track the Phase II Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs).

New features of the Phase 6 Watershed Model (continued) Over 30 years’ worth of monitoring data can be used to determine the accuracy of the land use and location simulations. Includes new BMPs; others have been re-analyzed for their effectiveness. Incorporates management decisions (Conowingo Dam, climate change and population growth). Unifies CAST and the Watershed Model; replaces MAST and VAST. All loads are identical between CAST and the Watershed Model because the calculation engine will be the same and only the interfaces will differ. With the unification of these modeling tools, MAST and VAST will be replaced by CAST. MAST: http://www.mastonline.org/default.aspx?AcceptsCookies=yes VAST: no longer available Conowingo Dam is a large hydroelectric dam in the lower Susquehanna River near the town of Conowingo, Maryland. The dam supports a 9,000-acre reservoir about 9.9 miles from the river mouth at the Chesapeake Bay. The dam traps sediment from the Susquehanna River and ensures additional pollution does not reach the Chesapeake Bay. Recently, studies have questioned whether Conowingo is a viable sediment management strategy. The Conowingo dam could be opened and pollution currently trapped by the dam could enter the watershed.