Christopher S. Brower, Konstantin I. Piatkov, Alexander Varshavsky 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Shan Zhang, Chengchao Xu, Katherine E. Larrimore, Davis T.W. Ng  Cell 
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Usa1 Functions as a Scaffold of the HRD-Ubiquitin Ligase
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
The UBA2 Domain Functions as an Intrinsic Stabilization Signal that Protects Rad23 from Proteasomal Degradation  Stijn Heessen, Maria G. Masucci, Nico.
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Donghang Cheng, Jocelyn Côté, Salam Shaaban, Mark T. Bedford 
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Feng Wang, Larissa A. Durfee, Jon M. Huibregtse  Molecular Cell 
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Stuart W. Hicks, Guillaume Charron, Howard C. Hang, Jorge E. Galán 
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
MCM9 Is Required for Mammalian DNA Mismatch Repair
Calnexin Controls the STAT3-Mediated Transcriptional Response to EGF
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
A Branched Pathway Governing the Activation of a Developmental Transcription Factor by Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis  Nathalie Campo, David Z. Rudner 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Lysine 63 Polyubiquitination of the Nerve Growth Factor Receptor TrkA Directs Internalization and Signaling  Thangiah Geetha, Jianxiong Jiang, Marie W.
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
A Role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 Family of Proteins in Activation of the APC/C Distinct from Substrate Recruitment  Yuu Kimata, Joanne E. Baxter, Andrew M.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Coupled Caspase and N-End Rule Ligase Activities Allow Recognition and Degradation of Pluripotency Factor LIN-28 during Non-Apoptotic Development  Benjamin.
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
The ISG15 Conjugation System Broadly Targets Newly Synthesized Proteins: Implications for the Antiviral Function of ISG15  Larissa A. Durfee, Nancy Lyon,
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
The ISG15 Conjugation System Broadly Targets Newly Synthesized Proteins: Implications for the Antiviral Function of ISG15  Larissa A. Durfee, Nancy Lyon,
An E3-like Factor that Promotes SUMO Conjugation to the Yeast Septins
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages (August 2000)
Evaluation of a Diffusion-Driven Mechanism for Substrate Ubiquitination by the SCF- Cdc34 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex  Matthew D. Petroski, Gary Kleiger,
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Effects of PS1 Deficiency on Membrane Protein Trafficking in Neurons
Pengbo Zhou, Robert Bogacki, Lisa McReynolds, Peter M. Howley 
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Modification by Single Ubiquitin Moieties Rather Than Polyubiquitination Is Sufficient for Proteasomal Processing of the p105 NF-κB Precursor  Yelena.
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Anna Shemorry, Cheol-Sang Hwang, Alexander Varshavsky  Molecular Cell 
Yuki Okuda-Shimizu, Linda M. Hendershot  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
James H. Cormier, Taku Tamura, Johan C. Sunryd, Daniel N. Hebert 
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Misfolded Membrane Proteins Are Specifically Recognized by the Transmembrane Domain of the Hrd1p Ubiquitin Ligase  Brian K. Sato, Daniel Schulz, Phong.
Presentation transcript:

Neurodegeneration-Associated Protein Fragments as Short-Lived Substrates of the N- End Rule Pathway  Christopher S. Brower, Konstantin I. Piatkov, Alexander Varshavsky  Molecular Cell  Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 161-171 (April 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.009 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 C-Terminal TDP43 Fragments from Aggregates in the Brains of Patients with Frontotemporal Lobal Degeneration as Short-Lived N-End Rule Substrates (A) Domain organization of human TDP43. Arrowheads indicate the cleavage sites. The acronyms RRM1 and RRM2 denote RNA-binding domains. (B) The cleavage site 1 is indicated by an arrowhead, with the P1’ residue (Arg) in red. X208-TDP43f fragments, produced from fDHFR-UbR48-X208-TDP43f (X = Arg, Gln, Glu, Met), were expressed in reticulocyte extract and labeled with 35S-Met/Cys for 10 min at 30°C, followed by a chase, immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibody, SDS-PAGE, and autoradiography. Indicated molecular masses of proteins in this and other panels include their ∼1 kDa flag epitope. (C) Quantification of (B) using the 33 kDa reference protein fDHFR-UbR48. (D) Same as (B) but with X219-TDP43f fragments (X = Asp, Arg-Asp, Met, Val). (E) Quantification of (D). (F) Same as (B) but with X247-TDP43f fragments (X = Asp, Arg-Asp, Met, Val). (G) Quantification of (F). See also Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S1 and S2. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 161-171DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.009) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 In Vivo Degradation and Aggregation of X247-TDP43f Fragments (A) Pulse-chase assays with X247-TDP43f, produced from fDHFR-UbR48-X247-TDP43f (X = Asp, Val, Arg-Asp). The fusion proteins were expressed in transiently transfected human HEK293T cells, which were labeled with 35S-Met/Cys for 15 min at 37°C, followed by a chase, preparation of extracts, immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag, SDS-PAGE, and autoradiography. For designations, see the legend to Figure 1B. (B) Quantification of (A). (C) Diagram of the mCherry-UbR48-Asp247-TDP43f fusion. The arrowhead indicates the site of cleavage by deubiquitylases (Figure S1C). (D) Representative images of either Ate1−/− (upper panels) or WT (lower panels) mouse EF cells transfected with a plasmid expressing mCherry-UbR48-Asp247-TDP43f. The mCherry moiety of mCherry-UbR48 was detected by red fluorescence, and the Asp247-TDP43f fragment was detected by indirect immunofluorescence, using anti-Flag antibody and a fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody. White bars indicate 10 μm. (E) Percentage of mCherry-positive cells containing Asp247-TDP43f aggregates, with surveys of >1,000 mCherry-positive cells of the WT and Ate1−/−genotypes. The error bars indicate SEM. Statistical analyses employed the unpaired t test (p < 10−12). See also Figure S2A. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 161-171DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.009) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Neurodegeneration-Associated C-Terminal Fragments of Human α-Synuclein and Tau as Short-Lived N-End Rule Substrates (A) Domain organization of human α-synuclein. Arrowhead indicates the metalloprotease cleavage site. (B) The cleavage site is indicated by an arrowhead, with the P1’ Gln (Q) residue in red. X79-αSynf, produced from fDHFR-UbR48-X-αSynf (X = Gln, Val) in reticulocyte extract, were assayed as described in the legend to Figure 1B. (C) Quantification of (B) using the reference fDHFR-UbR48. (D) Domain organization of human Tau-2N. Arrowheads indicate the calpain cleavage sites. See also Figure S3. (E) Same as (B) but with X3-Tau-2Nf, produced from fDHFR-UbR48-X3-Tau-2Nf (X = Glu, Val). See also Figure S3. (F) Quantification of (E). See also Figures S1 and S2. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 161-171DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.009) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 N-Terminal Arginylation of Aβ42, and the Degradation of C-Terminally Tagged Aβ42 by the Arg/N-End Rule Pathway (A) Human APP near its transmembrane domain, indicated by yellow rectangle. Arrowheads indicate the cleavage sites by secretases that yield Aβ42, termed Asp-Aβ42 and indicated by a red square bracket. (B) C-terminally tagged Asp-Aβ4213myc (produced from fDHFR-UbR48-Asp-Aβ4213myc) was assayed in reticulocyte extract as described in the legend to Figure 1B, with either no added dipeptides (lanes 1–3), 5 mM Arg-Ala (lanes 4–6), or Ala-Arg (lanes 7–9). (C) Quantification of (B). (D) Nt-arginylation of Asp-Aβ42 by isoforms of mouse Ate1 R-transferase. 0.1 or 1 μg of Ate1-1 (lanes 3 and 4), Ate1-2 (lanes 5 and 6), Ate1-3 (lanes 7 and 8), and Ate1-4 (lanes 9 and 10) were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 20 μg of chemically synthesized Asp-Aμ42, [14C]-L-arginine, and other components of the Nt-arginylation assay, followed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Lane 1, complete reaction (including equal amounts of all four Ate1 isoforms, 1 μg total) but no added Asp-Aβ42. Lane 2, same as lane 3 but without Ate1. Upper panel: immunoblotting with antibody to mouse Ate1. Middle panel: autoradiography to detect 14C-labeled Arg-Asp-Aβ42. Lower panel: immunoblotting with anti-4G8 antibody to detect Asp-Aβ42 or Arg-Asp-Aβ42. (E) Steady-state levels of X-Aβ4213myc, produced from fDHFR-UbR48-X-Aβ4213myc (X = Asp, Val, Arg-Asp, Met), in WT, ate1Δ, and ubr1Δ strains of S. cerevisiae. Upper panels: immunoblotting with anti-myc antibody. Lower panels: immunoblotting with anti-Flag antibody. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 161-171DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.009) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Untagged, N-Terminally Arginylated Human Aβ42 in Mouse Brains (A) Antibody (antiR-Aβ) specific for (R)DAEFRHDSGYC was examined by dot assay with Nt-arginylated Aβ and BRCA1 peptides (see the main text). (B) Immunoblotting of extracts from the indicated ate1Δ or ubr1Δ yeast strains expressing X-Aβ4213myc, produced in vivo from fDHFR-UbR48-X-Aβ4213myc (X = Asp, Arg-Asp). Upper panel: immunoblotting with antiR-Aβ antibody, characterized in (A). Lower panel: immunoblotting with anti-myc antibody. (C) X-Aβ4213myc was produced from fDHFR-UbR48-X-Aβ4213myc (X = Arg-Asp, Met, Asp) in the WT, Ate1−/−, or Ubr1−/− Ubr2−/− mouse EF cell lines, followed by SDS-PAGE of cell extracts and immunoblotting with anti-myc antibody. (D) Immunoblotting with anti-4G8 (recognizing total Aβ) of the indicated brain extracts from either 5xFAD or non-Tg (nontransgenic) mice. Also shown are immunoblots with antibody to GAPDH (loading controls). (E) Untagged, Nt-arginylated human Aβ42 in 70% formic acid (FA) extracts from mouse and human brains, detected by immunoblotting with antiR-Aβ. Lanes 1 and 2, FA extracts from brains of non-Tg and 5xFAD mice, respectively, that were treated with inhibitors of proteasome and neprilysin 12 hr before harvesting brains. Lane 3 and 4, FA extracts from the cortices of a human AD patient and a non-AD control, respectively. Lane 5, same as lane 2 but from 5xFAD mice that had not been treated with protease inhibitors. Lane 6, in vitro Nt-arginylated Arg-Asp Aβ42 (see Figure 4D), a positive control. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 161-171DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.009) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions