Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment of Differentiation and Progression of Hepatic Tumors Using Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization  Doris Steinemann, Britta Skawran,
Advertisements

Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Fig. 8. Recurrent copy number amplification of BRD4 gene was observed across common cancers. Recurrent copy number amplification of BRD4 gene was observed.
Assessing Copy Number Alterations in Targeted, Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Data  Catherine Grasso, Timothy Butler, Katherine Rhodes, Michael.
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Microarray-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Using Sex-Matched Reference DNA Provides Greater Sensitivity for Detection of Sex Chromosome Imbalances.
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Assessment of Differentiation and Progression of Hepatic Tumors Using Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization  Doris Steinemann, Britta Skawran,
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Array-CGH Reveals Recurrent Genomic Changes in Merkel Cell Carcinoma Including Amplification of L-Myc  Kelly G. Paulson, Bianca D. Lemos, Bin Feng, Natalia.
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Alterations of the Cell-Cycle Inhibitors p27KIP1 and p16INK4a Are Frequent in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasms  Thomas Wiesner, Anna C. Obenauf,
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
by Vladia Monsurrò, Ena Wang, Yoshisha Yamano, Stephen A
Carol S. Trempus, Hong Dang, Margaret M
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
High-Resolution Mapping of Genotype-Phenotype Relationships in Cri du Chat Syndrome Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization  Xiaoxiao Zhang, Antoine.
Microarray Techniques to Analyze Copy-Number Alterations in Genomic DNA: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array 
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Large-Scale Analysis Reveals Acquisition of Lineage-Specific Chromosomal Aberrations in Human Adult Stem Cells  Uri Ben-David, Yoav Mayshar, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Cyclin E1 Is Amplified and Overexpressed in Osteosarcoma
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Microarray Gene Expression Analysis of Fixed Archival Tissue Permits Molecular Classification and Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets in Diffuse.
Revisiting Global Gene Expression Analysis
Defining Ploidy-Specific Thresholds in Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization to Improve the Sensitivity of Detection of Single Copy Alterations in Cell.
Engineered Human Skin Substitutes Undergo Large-Scale Genomic Reprogramming and Normal Skin-Like Maturation after Transplantation to Athymic Mice  Jennifer.
Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma and Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma NOS Show Distinct Chromosomal Alterations and Differential Expression of Chemokine.
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Histology-Specific MicroRNA Alterations in Melanoma
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
A, genomic copy number profiles of chromosome 8 with array CGH in SUM-44, -52, and A, genomic copy number profiles of chromosome 8 with array CGH.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Pleiotropic Effects of Trait-Associated Genetic Variation on DNA Methylation: Utility for Refining GWAS Loci  Eilis Hannon, Mike Weedon, Nicholas Bray,
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Heat map of genes for which CR significantly altered expression versus AL. Cluster analysis of genes significantly changed by the CR intervention compared.
Mutational Analysis of Ionizing Radiation Induced Neoplasms
A, heatmap of copy number alterations determined by array CGH for a panel of 79 frozen NSCLC samples. A, heatmap of copy number alterations determined.
Integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number alterations.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 515-527 (December 2006) A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes  Richard M. Neve, Koei Chin, Jane Fridlyand, Jennifer Yeh, Frederick L. Baehner, Tea Fevr, Laura Clark, Nora Bayani, Jean-Philippe Coppe, Frances Tong, Terry Speed, Paul T. Spellman, Sandy DeVries, Anna Lapuk, Nick J. Wang, Wen-Lin Kuo, Jackie L. Stilwell, Daniel Pinkel, Donna G. Albertson, Frederic M. Waldman, Frank McCormick, Robert B. Dickson, Michael D. Johnson, Marc Lippman, Stephen Ethier, Adi Gazdar, Joe W. Gray  Cancer Cell  Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 515-527 (December 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Comparison of array CGH analyses of human breast cancer cell lines and primary tumors A and B: Frequencies of significant increases or decreases in genome copy number are plotted as a function of genome location for 51 cell lines (A) and 145 primary tumors (Fridlyand et al., 2006) (B). Positive values indicate frequencies of samples showing copy number increases [Log2(copy number) > 0.3], and negative values indicate frequencies of samples showing copy number decreases [Log2(copy number) < −0.3]. C and D: Differences (y axis) between frequencies of gains and losses across the genome for the cell lines versus the tumors are represented in C and D, respectively. Genome copy number aberration frequencies are plotted as a function of location position in the genome beginning at 1pter to the left and ending at Xqter to the right (chromosome locations are indicated by numbers above and below graphs). Vertical lines indicate chromosome boundaries. Vertical dotted lines indicate centromere locations. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 515-527DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of genome aberrations in 51 breast cancer cell lines and 145 primary breast tumors Clusters show results at 1952 BAC probes common between the tumor and cell line CGH arrays. Each row represents a BAC probe, and each column represents a cell line or tumor sample. Green indicates increased genome copy number, and red indicates decreased genome copy number. Yellow indicates high-level amplification. The bar to the left shows chromosome locations with chromosome 1pter to the top and 22qter to the bottom. The locations of the odd-numbered chromosomes (shaded black) are indicated. The upper color bar shows columns representing tumors or cell lines. The lower color bar indicates the genomic characteristics of the cell lines and tumors from this study and for the tumors as reported (Fridlyand et al., 2006). Color codes are indicated at the bottom of the figure. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 515-527DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gene expression profiles of 51 human breast cancer cell lines A: Hierarchical cluster analysis of breast cancer cell lines with subclusters [(i) through (v)] indicated by colored bars at side. Genes were restricted to those showing significant variance across all samples, resulting in clustering of 1438 probe sets (see Experimental Procedures). B: Cell lines clustered by genes selected by PAM analysis representing the luminal, Basal A, and Basal B clusters. Clustering was performed as described in the Experimental Procedures. Each row represents a gene, and each column represents a cell line sample. As shown in the color bar, black represents no change, red represents upregulation, and green represents downregulation of gene expression. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 515-527DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparative analyses of aberration frequencies in basal and luminal primary tumors and cell lines A–C: A and B show frequencies of genome copy number gains and losses in luminal and basal breast tumors, respectively (Fridlyand et al., 2006). C shows univariate statistical assessments of differences between the two tumor types. D–F: D and E show frequencies of genome copy number gains and losses in luminal and Basal B breast cancer cell lines, respectively. F shows univariate statistical assessments of differences between the two cell line types. p values of 0.05 and 0.01 are indicated as in C. All data are plotted beginning at chromosome 1pter to the left and ending at Xqter to the right. Vertical solid lines indicate chromosome boundaries. Vertical dashed lines indicate centromere locations. p values of 0.05 and 0.01 are indicated by dashed horizontal lines in C and F. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 515-527DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A functional model to investigate lead candidate therapeutic targets Gene expression and copy number for the 66 candidate therapeutic genes in the 51 breast cancer cell lines. Genes were selected for their overexpression and association with outcome in human breast tumors (Chin et al., 2006). High gene expression (≥2-fold over mean gene expression for all the samples) is shown in red, and high-level amplification (≥0.9 Log2 ratio) is shown in yellow for each cell line. Genes that have high expression and gene copy number are shown in blue. Gene HUGO names are shown to the right, and the corresponding BAC clone ID and chromosome are shown to the left. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 515-527DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Relationship of transcriptional profiles to biological function A: Morphology of cell lines grown in tissue culture on plastic. B: Invasive potential of 30 breast cancer cell lines as measured by modified Boyden chamber assays (see Experimental Procedures). Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three wells. Cancer Cell 2006 10, 515-527DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Indicators of therapeutic response to Trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines A: CGH profiles of nine breast cancer cell lines overexpressing HER2. B: Response of HER2-overexpressing cell lines to 48 hr treatment with 21 μg/ml Trastuzumab (Herceptin) as measured by BrdUrd incorporation (top panel) and relocalization of p27KIP1 (lower panel). Cancer Cell 2006 10, 515-527DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions