The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation on the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures By Shashank Priya, Director, Department of Commerce.
Advertisements

PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Arbitration and Amparo
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
Bankruptcy of the purchaser and enforceability of retention of title vis-à-vis its receivership International Insolvency Law Conference Nottingham Law.
Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Let’s Have An Other Look At The Lisbon Agreement Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
Madrid – A System for Businesses Madrid Seminar Washington 23 October 2013 Rodrigo Garcia-Conde Examiner.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, This Act contains 32 Sections in 5 Parts. THE PARTS ARE AS FOLLOWS Part I – (Sec. 1 and 2) gives the title and.
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
Open Competition Intellectual Property Specialists (AST 3/ AD6) OHIM, Alicante – Spain Open for application: October 31st 2013 Apply before : December.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
Madrid – A System for businesses Handling the Madrid Portfolio Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International.
LOGO The collective agreement. The labour contract.
Overview of the Madrid System USPTO GIPA 23 October 2013 Alan Datri Senior Counsellor  Slide updated 10/25/13.
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
1 Report of Patents Committee Meeting October 19, 2010 Kenji Asai Co-chair of the Patents Committee.
Milano, TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services produced or provided by one company from those of.
World Intellectual Property Organization The 1999 Geneva Act of the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs WIPO National.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
The EU General Data Protection Regulation Frank Rankin.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION IN GHANA BY MRS. SARAH NORKOR ANKU, STATE ATTORNEY REGISTRAR-GENRAL’S DEPARTMENT 27/1/2016.
Dispute settlement mechanism within the Lisbon system 6 December 2013 Massimo Vittori, Managing Director.
WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation in Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises May 12, 2005 José.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
How to Complete a Free Trademark Search in India.
Unit 3 Seminar International Issues in IP Law. Unit 3 – International Issues in IP Law Unit 3 will focus on Chapters 8, 16 & 21 –Make sure to download.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
Effects on other proceedings against or by the debtor. Creditor rights Dr Marek Porzycki.
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Recent Developments at the International Level
European Union Law Week 10.
Geographical Indications
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
How the OHIM will handle Madrid filings
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
SPCs and the unitary patent package
Community protection of geographical indications :
Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
European Insolvency Regulation
The WTO-Agreement on Import Licensing
EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP
European Company Law Dorota Wieczorkowska
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin at the international level through the filing of a single application for registration. As any system for the filing and recording of IPRs, also the Lisbon System for the notification and registration of appellations of origin specifies a large number of substantive and procedural requirements. Operation of the System requires formal examination by WIPO of applications received. These should contain the necessary data for individual member States to judge whether the subject-matter of an application actually meets the requirements for protection. Individual member States may refuse protection, if they so notify WIPO. Their refusal notifications should also meet certain requirements and will then be entered in the International Register. There are also procedures for the recording of changes to registered appellations, such as invalidation of the effects of the appellation by a certain member State or modifications notified by the country of origin, for example, concerning the limits of the area of production, the holders of the right to use the appellation, or the legal basis for protection. On an annual basis, there are relatively few entries in the International Register established under the Lisbon Agreement and they have marginal impact on the overall operations under the various registration systems WIPO administers. Staff employed for these other registration systems take care of the handling of Lisbon notifications. Thanks to the infrastructure available in WIPO for the handling of incoming IP notifications, the work involved in the receipt, indexing, examining, translating, communication with applicant countries and third countries, registration, publication and the maintenance of an on-line database can be done at marginal cost.

Necessary Legal Basis Substantive Requirements Formal Requirements Legal Effect The Lisbon System facilitates the recognition and protection of a special category of geographical indications, namely “appellations of origin”, in countries other than their country of origin. The Lisbon Agreement and its Regulations lay down a number of eligibility criteria for the international registration of appellations. Formal requirements aim to standardize notifications as much as possible and facilitate their examination by WIPO and member countries. They also help in the development of Internet-based publication of data contained in the International Register and in automating the procedures. As regards legal effect, the Lisbon procedures allow for the allocation of filing and priority dates securing the priority of applications claiming protection for appellations. In addition, the Lisbon Agreement lays down a number of provisions of substantive law concerning the protection to be made available at the national level.

Substantive Requirements (1) Protection in the country of origin Ex ante recognition “Appellation of origin” as defined in Lisbon “Country of origin” as defined in Lisbon Demarcation of the area of production In order to qualify for registration at WIPO, an “appellation of origin” must be recognized and protected in the country of origin in accordance with the definition of Article 2(1) of the Lisbon Agreement. Under Article 2(2), country of origin means “the country whose name, or the country in which is situated the region or locality whose name, constitutes the appellation of origin that has given the product its reputation”. This condition implies that the appellation of origin should be protected in its country of origin as an “appellation of origin”, which, in accordance with the Lisbon definition, means as a geographical name recognized in the country of origin as the name of a geographical area (country, region or locality) serving to designate a product that originates therein and meeting certain qualifications. Such ex ante recognition of the name can take place by virtue of legislative or administrative provisions, a judicial decision or registration. The manner in which recognition takes place is determined by the domestic legislation of the country of origin. This does, in principle, not exclude registration in the country of origin as a certification mark, for example if the certification mark in question meets the definition of a Lisbon appellation and its registration as a certification mark implies recognition by the country of origin. However, clearly, the more common way to register certification marks internationally is through the procedures of the Madrid System for the international registration of marks, i.e. in the 77 contracting parties of that system. The demarcated area should be the area of production of the products protected by the appellation.

Substantive Requirements (2) Entitlement to file applications The competent authority of the country of origin Registration shall be effected in the name of those having, under their national legislation, a right to use the appellation The application for registration has to be filed by the competent national authority of the country of origin. Registration is in the name of the natural persons or legal entities, public or private, having, according to their national legislation, the right to use the appellation in the country of origin.

Formal Requirements Official form Fees: 500 Sfr (registration) 200 Sfr (modification) Language: E, F or S Translation and transliteration Correction of irregularities Certificate Notifications to 3rd countries Publication Applications are to be filed on the official form established by WIPO, in English, French or Spanish. If this is not the case or if any of the mandatory content requirements is not met, WIPO will communicate with the competent national authority in the country of origin and enter the appellation, and its transliteration into Latin characters, in the International Register, once all these irregularities have been corrected and the application had been translated by the International Bureau into the other working languages. It will then also send a certificate of registration to the applicant country and notify the other member countries. The necessary data to identify the registered appellation will also be published in the Lisbon Bulletin. They are also made available on WIPO’s website in the Lisbon Express database. For the registration of each appellation of origin, a fee of SwF 500,- was due and, for the entry of a modification, a fee of SwF 200,-.

Legal Effect (1) Effect of international registration extension of protection to countries other than the country of origin indefinite (as long as the appellation is protected in the country of origin) Except in a country that ... issued a refusal (within the prescribed time-limit), or invalidated the effect of the international registration in its territory An appellation which has been the subject of an international registration is ensured protection in each member country which has not issued a refusal. Member countries that have received notice of the registration of an appellation have the right to refuse its protection in their territory. Any such declaration of refusal has to meet two requirements. The first is a time requirement: the refusal has to be notified to WIPO within a period of one year from the date of receipt by the country in question of the notice of registration. The second is a requirement regarding content: the declaration of refusal has to specify the grounds for refusal. When WIPO receives a declaration of refusal within the prescribed period, it notifies it to the country of origin, enters it in the International Register and publishes it in the Lisbon Bulletin. The country of origin communicates it in turn to the interested parties concerned, who may avail themselves of the same administrative and legal remedies against the refusal as nationals of the country that pronounced it. The international registration of an appellation assures its protection, without any need for renewal, for as long as the appellation is protected in its country of origin. Nevertheless, where the effects of an international registration are invalidated in a member country and the invalidation is no longer subject to appeal, the country concerned shall notify WIPO, which will enter the invalidation in the International Register and send a copy of the notification to the country of origin.

Grounds of refusal As available at the domestic level As I said, the declaration of refusal has to specify the grounds for refusal. There is no limitation as to what grounds. Any ground can be advanced that is available at the domestic level to oppose the grant of protection for an appellation registered under Lisbon, in accordance with the procedures available at the domestic level. For instance, a country may refuse to protect an appellation because it considers that the appellation has already acquired a generic character in its territory in relation to the product to which it refers; or because it considers that the geographical designation does not conform to the Lisbon definition of an appellation; or because the appellation would conflict with a trademark or other right already protected in the country concerned.

Legal Effect (2) Required level of protection (at a minimum) protection against any usurpation or imitation cannot be deemed to have become generic Standing for taking legal action Article 3 of the Lisbon Agreement defines the content of the protection that the member States undertake to accord to appellations registered at WIPO. According to that provision, protection is to be ensured against any usurpation or imitation of the appellation, even if the true origin of the product is stated or if the appellation is used in translated form or accompanied by terms such as “kind,” “type,” “make,” “imitation” and the like. Article 6 specifies that, if the registration of an appellation has not been refused by a country, it cannot, subsequently, deem that appellation to have become generic, as long as it is protected in the country of origin. This does not mean that Lisbon precludes that the effects of an international registration can be invalidated in a member country. Any such invalidation can also be recorded in the International Register, if it is no longer subject to appeal in the country concerned. Invalidation might be decided by a court, if it is found that, for example, prior trademark rights had already existed in the country concerned or that the name had already become generic before the date of the international registration in question. The necessary enforcement action has to be taken before the competent authorities of each of the countries of the Union in which the appellation is protected, according to the procedural rules laid down in the national legislation of those countries. Standing must be available for the public prosecutor, the competent Office or interested parties.

Lisbon Agreement(1958) 23 Member States 854 registrations (781 in force) In the course of 2004, five new appellations were notified and registered, namely three from Mexico, one from Italy and one from Cuba. These appellations were: Mango Ataulfo del Soconusco Chiapas, Charanda (alcoholic beverage), Café Chiapas, Prosciutto de San Daniele and Pinar del Rio (tobacco). Two appellations were cancelled. Six were modified. In addition, two refusals were recorded in the International Register.

THANK YOU Matthijs Geuze Senior Counsellor WIPO