Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Real-Time Estimation of Earthquake Location and Magnitude for Seismic Early Warning in Campania Region, southern Italy A. Zollo and RISSC-Lab Research.
Advertisements

Cascadia Ken Creager, Steve Malone, Geoff Abers, Stephane Rondenay, Brad Hacker and Tim Melbourne Earth and Space Sciences University of Washington.
Real-time Monitoring of Slip Triangles: Tremor Activity –Average envelope seismogram amplitudes in tremor passband –Active Tremor = black triangles Arrows:
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, November 2007, Tokyo, Japan OPTIMUM ARRAY DESIGN FOR THE DETECTION OF DISTANT.
Digital Signal Processing
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Reflection Field Methods
Earthquakes and Volcanoes. Earthquakes An earthquake is the shaking and trembling that results from the sudden movement of part of the Earth’s crust.
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Quality Factor Inversion from Prestack CMP data using EPIF Matching Jing Zhao, Jinghuai Gao Institute of Wave and Information,
Locating the Epicenter
Inputs to Signal Generation.vi: -Initial Distance (m) -Velocity (m/s) -Chirp Duration (s) -Sampling Info (Sampling Frequency, Window Size) -Original Signal.
Seismicity around Lhasa Tsoja Wangmo 1), Norsang Gelsor 1) and Jens Havskov 2) 1) Jiangsu Road No 36 Lhasa, Tibet, PRC 2) University of Bergen, Department.
Global Broadband Arrays – a View from NORSAR Johannes Schweitzer and NORSAR’s Array Seismology Group Workshop on Arrays in Global Seismology May 15 – 16,
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
1 Fault Dynamics of the April 6, 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake Sequence Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University Luca Malagnini INGV, Roma.
Teleseismic Location find direction of signals based on Array algorithms backtrace ray paths through the earth simplifications: flat earth, plane waves.
New earthquake category Nature 447, (3 May 2007) | doi: /nature05780; Received 8 December 2006; Accepted 26 March A scaling law for slow.
Crust and upper mantle structure of Tien Shan Orogen and its surroundings by ambient noise tomography and earthquake tomography Yong Zheng a, Yingjie Yang.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Presented to the Induced Seismicity Consortium, USC 2013 Stephen Holtkamp Michael Brudzinski Brian Currie Miami University, Oxford OH Department of Geology.
An array analysis of seismic surface waves
MICRO-SEISMICITY AND FOCAL MECHANISMS IN THE MALÉ KARPATY MTS., SLOVAKIA Lucia Fojtíková, Václav Vavryčuk, Andrej Cipciar, Ján Madarás.
Surface waves Earthquakes generate both body waves (P, S) and surface waves Surface waves are generated along any free surface in the medium In the Earth,
Episodic Tremor in the Alaska/Aleutian Subduction Zone Chloe Peterson, Douglas Christensen, and Steve McNutt Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska.
Beginning search for deep moonquakes locations on the lunar far side T. Sonnemann 1, 2, M. Knapmeyer 1 and J. Oberst 1 1 Institute of Planetary Research,
Observation of diffuse seismic waves at teleseismic distances
THE ANALYSIS OF THE INFRASOUND SIGNALS FROM MAY 12 EARTHQUAKE WENCHUAN CHINA Wang Xiaohang Signal Processing Department North China Institute of Computing.
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Usage of joint rating functions for seismic phase association and event location Asming V.E., Prokudina A.V., Nakhshina L.P. Kola Regional Seismological.
Adaphed from Rappaport’s Chapter 5
Seismology Part VII: Characteristics of Surface Wave Propagation.
Seismic Arrays presented at the WORKSHOP High Quality Seismic Stations and Networks for Small Budgets Volcan, Panama March 2004by Jens Havskov, Department.
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
P wave amplitudes in 3D Earth Guust Nolet, Caryl Michaelson, Ileana Tibuleac, Ivan Koulakov, Princeton University.
1 Wavefield Calibration Using Regional Network Data R. B. Herrmann Saint Louis University.
Focal mechanisms and moment tensors of micro-earthquakes in the Malé Karpaty (Little Carpathians) Mts., Slovakia Lucia Fojtíková 1, Václav Vavryčuk 2,
Small-aperture seismic arrays: instruments and detectability Jiří Málek, Milan Brož and Jaroslav Štrunc Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics AS CR,
Exercise.04 Receiver functions will be determined Receiver functions will be inverted Receiver functions and surface-wave dispersion will be inverted jointly.
Seismic phases and earthquake location
Teleseismic Location find direction of signals based on Array algorithms backtrace ray paths through the earth simplifications: flat earth, plane waves.
EARTH’S INTERIOR.
Content: Distortion at electronic loads
Shadowing.
3D Array Processing Sept 8, 2016, DUGL telecon
Introduction to Seismology
Reappraisal of single station locations reported by the SANSN
GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 1:
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Lecture on Earthquakes result from Seismic Waves
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Lithosphere Delamination and Small-Scale Convection Beneath California Imaged with High Resolution Rayleigh Wave Tomography Donald W. Forsyth and Yingjie.
Automatic Picking of First Arrivals
Time domain & frequency domain
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
1-D Mississippi embayment sediment velocity structure and anisotropy: constraint from ambient noise analysis on a dense array Chunyu,Liu1; Charles A. Langston1.
4 min of arrival difference = 2,600 km
Craters on Mars DRAFT Google Earth.
Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France
Component: E Local quakes Broad frequency Two tremor bursts
Let’s work through a visualization of how velocities from three PBO GPS stations can be used to determine the local rate of infinitesimal strain.
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Larry Braile, Purdue University
When does the P wave arrive? 08:08:00
Earthquake Magnitude Ahmed Elgamal
by Satoshi Ide, Annemarie Baltay, and Gregory C. Beroza
Signal Transmission and Channel Bandwidth
Locating an Earthquake's
EARTH’S INTERIOR.
EARTH’S INTERIOR.
Presentation transcript:

Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone Array Analysis of Cascadia Deep Tremor Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone (creager@ess.washington.edu, University of Washington, Dept of Earth & Space Sciences, Seattle, WA 98195 Abstract In July, 2004 an episode of non-volcanic deep tremor was recorded on three arrays of short-period three-component seismometers. Each array consisted of 6 to 7 seismometers with an aperture of 500 meters. The arrays straddled the Straights of Juan de Fuca with separation distances of 50 to 80 km. Tremor migrated under the array from south to north. Signals within an array are highly correlated in the frequency band from about 2 to 6 Hz, providing a high fidelity view of the source. However, there is no correlation from one array to the next. We have implemented the following Kirchhoff migration procedure which takes advantage of the correlated phase within each array. First we band-pass filter the seismograms at 2-4 Hz. For each of many target points within the Earth, we calculate the travel time and slowness vector to each array using a high-resolution 3-D model. We stack the waveforms at the appropriate slowness; time shift them according to the predicted travel time; calculate their envelope functions and apply a low pass filter. A source is identified as point in which the resulting time series from the three arrays are similar. This is identified in both the time domain at fixed points, and by viewing analyzing movie of slices of the Earth's interior as a function of time. Examples of each will be shown at the poster, as well as the potential of this approach to determine accurate source depths, which have proven to be an especially difficult to constrain by other methods. Time axes all are in seconds after July 15, 2004 08:03:55. Eleven tremor bursts are identified and located using the regional network data. Their locations are given by the numbers on the map. Events 4, 5, 6, and 10 are shown above with seismograms aligned according to predictions for an S-wave model and the source locations determined using the network data. Seismograms are filtered into two bands: 0.4-1.7 Hz and 1.4-7.0 Hz. Many of the bursts align across all three networks and, extend to frequencies as low as 0.5 Hz. SOOKE East-West LOPEZ SEQUIM Slowness estimated across a broad frequency range from 0.4-5 Hz for 60 second windows at each of the arrays, using both horizontal channels. Upper plot shows same results for LOPEZ (red), SEQUIM(blue) and SOOKE (black). RESULTS 1. Tremor signals are coherent across the stations of the arrays. 2. The tremor occurs both with changes in the amplitude and as a low-level relatively constant signal. 3. Multiple signals can be active any given time. 4. Small aperture arrays can resolve these multiple sources. 5. Tremor source locations can remain constant over several seconds 6. There is a general migration of the tremor epicenters from the point of initiation to the northwest and to the south. 7. Tremor is observed at frequencies as low as 0.5 Hz using high-frequency sensors. Broadband arrays are needed to better characterize the frequency content of the tremor. Epicentral locations were determined by picking relative arrival times of energy bursts on the bandpass filtered (2-6Hz), rectified and smoothed time signal for network data. The picks are refined using cross-correlation of the envelopes of the energy bursts. During active periods, many tremor sources may be occurring simultaneously, complicating location efforts. Errors in epicenter are on the order of a kilometer. Errors in the depth for the best locations are on the order of 10 kilometers, determined by the RMS residual. The tremor signals move across network stations with an apparent velocity of ~4 km/s, and the signals are strongest on the horizontal components.