Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Self-Excising Retroviral Vectors Encoding the Cre Recombinase Overcome Cre- Mediated Cellular Toxicity  Daniel P. Silver, David M. Livingston  Molecular.
c-Jun Is Essential for Organization of the Epidermal Leading Edge
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 20, Pages S1-S2 (October 1999)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Late mitotic failure in mice lacking Sak, a polo-like kinase
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Complexity of VEGF Responses in Skin Carcinogenesis Revealed through Ex Vivo Assays Based on a VEGF-A Null Mouse Keratinocyte Cell Line  Isabel Mirones,
Thorsten Buch, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat, Irmgard Förster, Klaus Rajewsky 
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Condensin Is Required for Nonhistone Protein Assembly and Structural Integrity of Vertebrate Mitotic Chromosomes  Damien F. Hudson, Paola Vagnarelli,
The Mouse Spo11 Gene Is Required for Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Human Blinkin/AF15q14 Is Required for Chromosome Alignment and the Mitotic Checkpoint through Direct Interaction with Bub1 and BubR1  Tomomi Kiyomitsu,
Generation of γ1 EQ conditional knock-in mice.
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Modeling the Therapeutic Efficacy of p53 Restoration in Tumors
JNK2 Is a Positive Regulator of the cJun Transcription Factor
Naokazu Inoue, Ph. D. , Takao Nishikawa, M. S. , Masahito Ikawa, Ph. D
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
AURORA-A amplification overrides the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, inducing resistance to Taxol  Shubha Anand, Sue Penrhyn-Lowe, Ashok R Venkitaraman 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Katja Wassmann, Théodora Niault, Bernard Maro  Current Biology 
Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice  Jie Zhu, Simone Petersen, Lino Tessarollo,
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 20, Issue 17, Pages (September 2010)
Chk1 Is Required for Spindle Checkpoint Function
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
CENP-E as an Essential Component of the Mitotic Checkpoint In Vitro
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Polo-like Kinase 1 Triggers the Initiation of Cytokinesis in Human Cells by Promoting Recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Central Spindle  Mark Petronczki,
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Securin is not required for cellular viability, but is required for normal growth of mouse embryonic fibroblasts  Junjie Mei, Xingxu Huang, Pumin Zhang 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
POLD3 Is Haploinsufficient for DNA Replication in Mice
PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Regulates Spindle Orientation in Adherent Cells
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages e4 (June 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 566-579 (October 2007) Bub1 Maintains Centromeric Cohesion by Activation of the Spindle Checkpoint  David Perera, Valerie Tilston, Jane A. Hopwood, Marco Barchi, Raymond P. Boot-Handford, Stephen S. Taylor  Developmental Cell  Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 566-579 (October 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Creation of Conditional and Null BUB1 Alleles (A) Schematic representations of (i) the Bub1 protein showing the N-terminal homology domain (N-THD), the Bub3-binding site/kinetochore localization domain (KLD), and the kinase domain; (ii) a portion of the BUB1 gene showing exons 4–14 and the EcoRI restriction sites (R); (iii) the targeting vector showing the neo-tk cassette and LoxP sites; (iv) the structure of the correctly targeted allele; (v) the conditional allele (F for floxed); and (vi) the null allele (Δ). Also shown are the EcoRI restriction fragments detected by probe a. Underlined numbers show PCR genotyping primers 1–4. (B) Table showing the sizes of the PCR products generated by primers 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 3 and 4 distinguishing the various genotypes. (C) PCR products generated by amplifying tail snip DNA with the primers indicated. The asterisks indicate heteroduplexes formed by annealing of the larger and smaller PCR products. (D) Southern blot of EcoRI-digested tail DNA probed with probe a confirming the genotypes. (E) Western blots of BUB1F/Δ MEFs infected with AdCre then probed to detect Bub1 and tubulin. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 566-579DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Embryonic Lethality of BUB1Δ/Δ Embryos (A) PCR genotyping of blastocyst DNA using primers 1 and 2 and 1 and 3, confirming the presence of homozygous null embryos at day 3.5, plus a table showing the number of BUB1Δ/ Δ animals observed at the age of weaning (p21), postimplantation (E8.5 to E9.5), and at the blastocyst stage (E3.5) following BUB1Δ/+ intercrosses. (B) Phase contrast images of embryos harvested at day 3.5 and cultured in vitro for 7 days, plus PCR products obtained using primers 3 and 4 (upper panel) and 1 and 3 (lower panel) confirming the genotypes. Images, taken at progressively lower magnification, show that in contrast to Bub1 null embryos, the controls form a robust inner cell mass (ICM) upon a layer of trophoblast cells (T). (C) Confocal images of embryos harvested at day 3.5 cultured in vitro for 4 days then fixed and stained to detect phospho-histone H3 (green) and the DNA (red), plus PCR genotypes obtained using primers 3 and 4 (upper panel) and 1 and 3 (lower panel). Arrows indicate examples of mitotic cells; note that cells in the BUB1Δ/ Δ embryo which stain weakly for phospho-histone H3 are interphase cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 566-579DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Tamoxifen-Induced Inactivation of Bub1 Inhibits Proliferation of Embryonic Fibroblasts (A and B) BUB1F/+ and BUB1F/Δ MEFs harboring ERT-Cre were treated with 0.1 and 1.0 μM OHT for 24 hr and then analyzed by PCR genotyping using primers 1 and 3 (A) and western blotting (B). (C–F) BUB1F/Δ ERT-Cre MEFs were plated at 80% confluency, cultured for 2 days then treated with 0.1 OHT for 48 hr. On day 4 the cultures were expanded, the OHT removed, and the cells analyzed at subsequent time points. (C) Timeline showing experimental design. (D) Growth curves showing antiproliferative effect following Bub1-inactivation. (E) DNA content histograms showing marked reduction of cells with 2n and 4n values. (F) Fluorescence images of nuclei showing aberrant morphologies in Bub1 null cells. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 566-579DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Bub1 Is Required for Kinetochore Targeting of BubR1 and SAC Function Asynchronous BUB1F/Δ ERT-Cre MEFs were treated with 0.5 μM OHT for 24 hr then analyzed by western blotting, immunofluorescence, and time-lapse microscopy. In (B) and (D), cells were preinfected with adenoviral vectors as indicated. In (E), cells were preinfected with retrovirus encoding a GFP-tagged histone H2B. (A) Western blots showing that BubR1 levels are unaffected following Bub1 inactivation. Tubulin was used as loading control. (B) Projections of deconvolved image stacks showing that kinetochore localization of BubR1 requires Bub1. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C and D) Line graphs plotting the percentage of cells in mitosis in the presence or absence of monastrol as indicated. The time in mitosis is defined as the interval between nuclear envelope breakdown and chromosome decondensation, as determined by phase-contrast time-lapse analysis. At least 18 cells were analyzed in each condition. (E) Fluorescence images from time-lapse sequences. Numbers represent minutes after NEBD. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 566-579DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 K-Fibers Form and Centromeric Cohesion Is Maintained in Bub1 Null Cells (A) BUB1F/Δ ERT-Cre MEFs were synchronized and exposed to 0.1 μM OHT as shown in Figure 3C. At T = 24 hr, the cells were treated with MG132 for 1 hr to arrest the cells downstream of the SAC, fixed to preserve K-fibers, and then stained to detect tubulin (green), Bub1 (not shown), and DNA (red). Images show projections of deconvolved image stacks. Enlargement shows a mono-oriented chromosome in the Bub1 null cell. Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Asynchronous BUB1F/Δ ERT-Cre MEFs were treated with 0.5 μM OHT for 24 hr, exposed to nocodazole ± MG132 for 1 hr then chromosome spreads prepared and scored for premature centromere separation (PCS). As a positive control, cells were treated with okadaic acid. Images and enlargements show examples of spreads and individual chromosomes respectively. Percentages show the number of spreads represented by that image. (C) Bar graph quantitating the percentage of mitotic cells exhibiting PCS. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 566-579DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Bub1 Is Required for Spermatogenesis Male mice harboring conditional Bub1 alleles and the ERT-Cre transgene were injected with tamoxifen, and the testes were isolated and analyzed by PCR genotyping, western blotting, and histology. (A) PCR genotyping with primers 3 and 4 (upper panel) and 1 and 3 (lower panel) demonstrating efficient conversion of F alleles to Δ. (B) Western blot confirming depletion of Bub1 protein in BUB1F/Δ and BUB1F/F males following tamoxifen exposure. (C) Hematoxylin/eosin-stained testes sections showing aberrant tubule morphology in Bub1-deficient testes. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) PAS/hematoxylin-stained tubules showing that following tamoxifen treatment, tubules are frequently abnormal and often cannot be staged (asterisks). Roman numerals indicate tubules in various stages of spermatogenesis, arrows indicate anaphases. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 566-579DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Bub1 Is Required for Postimplantation Embryo Development A BUB1F/F ERT-Cre male was crossed with a BUB1Δ/+ ERT-Cre female. Ten and a half days p.c., the female was injected with tamoxifen and then on day 18.5 p.c., the embryos were harvested and genotyped. (A) Schematic of mating regimen. (B) PCR genotyping using primers 3 and 4 (upper panel) and 1 and 3 (middle panel) to confirm the genotype and the presence of Cre (lower panel). Note that recombination is not 100% efficient, explaining the presence of F alleles in tamoxifen-treated BUB1F/Δ embryos. (C) Images of embryos shortly after harvesting on day 18.5 showing arrested development in the BUB1F/Δ animals. Scale bar, 5 mm. The genotypes of the F/+ and F/Δ embryos are shown in lanes 1–5 and 6–9, respectively, in panel B. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 566-579DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions