Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 5-15 (July 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Deletion of the Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene and Haploinsufficiency of Telomere Maintenance in Cri du Chat Syndrome  Anju Zhang, Chengyun Zheng,
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages (November 2012)
Anthony J. Cesare, Makoto T. Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Megan van Overbeek, Titia de Lange  Current Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Recent Expansion of the Telomeric Complex in Rodents: Two Distinct POT1 Proteins Protect Mouse Telomeres  Dirk Hockemeyer, Jan-Peter Daniels, Hiroyuki.
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 123, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Generating Late-Onset Human iPSC-Based Disease Models by Inducing Neuronal Age- Related Phenotypes through Telomerase Manipulation  Elsa Vera, Nazario.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 91, Issue 1, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 149, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 22, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
The Shortest Telomere, Not Average Telomere Length, Is Critical for Cell Viability and Chromosome Stability  Michael T Hemann, Margaret A Strong, Ling-Yang.
Aneuploidy Acts Both Oncogenically and as a Tumor Suppressor
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages (November 2012)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Increased Expression of Wnt2 and SFRP4 in Tsk Mouse Skin: Role of Wnt Signaling in Altered Dermal Fibrillin Deposition and Systemic Sclerosis  Julie Bayle,
Ribosome Collision Is Critical for Quality Control during No-Go Decay
SOCS1 Links Cytokine Signaling to p53 and Senescence
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
SIRT1 Is Necessary for Proficient Telomere Elongation and Genomic Stability of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells  Maria Luigia De Bonis, Sagrario Ortega,
Hung-Chun Chang, Leonard Guarente  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2018)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 5-15 (July 2012) mRNA Decay Factor AUF1 Maintains Normal Aging, Telomere Maintenance, and Suppression of Senescence by Activation of Telomerase Transcription  Adam R. Pont, Navid Sadri, Susan J. Hsiao, Susan Smith, Robert J. Schneider  Molecular Cell  Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 5-15 (July 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Decreased Survival and Increased Markers of Aging in Late-Generation Auf1−/− Mice (A) Percentage of each genotype at live birth from Auf1+/− crossings for indicated generation. n = number of mice in each group. p values based on expected Mendelian ratios, n = 3. ∗p ≤ 0.04; ∗∗p ≤ 0.02, calculated by Chi-square test. (B) Frequency and survival beyond 4 weeks for Auf1−/− KO mice per generation. (C) Top: Representative images of whole testes from 25-day-old G7 WT (Auf1+/+) and KO littermates. Bottom: H&E sections showing aberrant maturation and degeneration of germ cell epithelium (yellow arrowhead). (D) Representative images of SA-β-gal staining, a marker for cellular senescence, in indicated tissues from 2-day-old WT and KO littermates. (E) Staining for SA-β-gal in the villi of the duodenum and white pulp of the spleen from 12-month-old mice. (F and G) Proliferation of isolated splenic CD3+ T cells and B220+ B cells by 3H-thymidine labeling of G6 animals. ∗p < 0.01 by paired Student's t test ± SEM, n = 3. (H) Frequency of live births and survival of G7, G5.BC1.iG1, and G5.BC1.iG2 KO mice. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 5-15DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Aging-Related Phenotypes and Upregulation of p16Ink4A, p19Arf, and p21CIP Expression in Auf1−/− Mice (A) Representative images of kyphosis (hunchback) (arrow), presence (top panel) and absence (bottom panel) of subcutaneous body fat (arrows), and atrophied gonads typically observed in 12-month-old Auf1−/− (KO) mice but not in WT littermates. Images shown represent the majority of KO animals surveyed (>60%, kyphosis; >90%, reduced body fat; >90%, gonadal atrophy). (B) Increased relative expression of p16Ink4a, p19Arf, and p21CIP mRNAs in tissues and organs from 12-month-old KO mice compared to WT littermates, determined by qRT-PCR. (C) Immunohistochemical staining for p16Ink4a and p21CIP (brown, arrows) in organ sections from 12-month-old KO mice compared to WT littermates. Sections counterstained by H&E. (D) Decay plots of p16Ink4a, p19Arf, and p21CIP mRNAs in MEFs from G2 embryos. Transcription was blocked with actinomycin D, cells were collected at indicated time points, RNA was extracted and mRNA levels were quantified by qRT-PCR. Plots are the mean of three independent experiments with calculated half-lives shown. (E) Decay plots showing recovery of p16Ink4a mRNA destabilization by individual isoforms of AUF1 in KO MEFs. Plot shown is an average of three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 5-15DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Decreased Telomere Lengths in Late-Generation Auf1−/− Splenocytes (A) Q-FISH telomere length analysis, frequency distribution of telomeric DNA signal intensities (telomere fluorescence units, TFUs), ≥20 metaphase splenocyte spreads of three mice. Arrow, chromosome ends with no detectable telomere (signal free ends, SFEs), ∗p < 0.01. (B) Left, representative splenocyte metaphase spreads from G7 mice stained with Cy3-labeled PNA telomere probes (arrows, SFEs). Right, frequency of SFEs in G7 splenocyte metaphase spreads. ∗p < 0.05, ± SEM, n = 3. (C) Left, chromosomal abnormalities in KO spreads: representative fused chromosomes (yellow), chromosomal breaks (green), uneven translocated chromatids (red). Right, frequency of end-to-end fusions in G7 splenocyte metaphase spreads, ≥150 metaphase spreads from three mice each, ± SEM. (D) Frequency of SFEs in splenocyte metaphase spreads from G7 mice and corresponding mice from single WT backcrossed (G5.BC1.iG1) or triple WT backcrossed (G5.BC3.iG1) backgrounds. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 4). ∗p < 0.05. All statistics by paired Student's t test. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 5-15DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Increased DNA Damage Signaling at Telomere Ends and Cell Growth Defects in Auf1−/− Cells (A) Levels of phospho-ATM (arrowhead), phospho-p53 (Ser15), and p21CIP determined by immunoblot analysis in two independent AUF1 WT and KO MEF cell lines. (B) Immunofluorescence staining for γ-H2AX and TRF1 colocalized at telomere ends. Arrowheads: telomere dysfunction induced foci (TIFs) (Takai et al., 2003). (C) Quantification of TIFs in MEFs from indicated generation, ≥30 nuclei from three MEF cell lines. Positive cells contain ≥ 5 TIFs. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3). p < 0.01 by paired Student's t test. E, early passage; L, late passage. (D) MEF proliferation determined by MTT assay. E, early passage; L, late passage; PD, population doublings. Values are p < 0.01, ± SEM, n = 4. (E) Anchorage-independent growth assayed by soft agar colony formation. Number of colonies shown. (F) Representative end-to-end chromosomal fusions lacking detectable telomere signal (arrow) in AUF1 KO splenocyte cell metaphase spreads stained with telomere-specific probes and DAPI counter-stained. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 5-15DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Strongly Decreased Telomerase Levels and Activity in AUF1-Deficient Cells (A and B) Relative mTert and mTerc RNA levels in WT and AUF1 KO MEFs, determined by qRT-PCR. ∗p < 0.05 ± SEM, n = 3. (C) Immunoblot showing mTERT protein levels in WT and KO MEFs. (D) Relative telomerase activity in extracts from WT and KO MEFs as determined by TRAP assay. Mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, ∗p < 0.05. (E) Partial rescue of mTert mRNA expression in AUF1−/− (KO) MEFs by ectopic expression of individual AUF1 isoforms, determined by qRT-PCR. Representative immunoblot for AUF1 is shown. The p37 AUF1 panel was exposed 3× longer. (F) Rescue of mTERT mRNA expression by p45/p42 AUF1 isoforms in AUF1 KO MEF cells, carried out as described above. ∗p < 0.05 ± SEM (n = 4). (G) Telomere restriction fragment analysis of serially passaged KO MEF cells with or without ectopic mTERT expression. Autoradiograph indicates intensity of probe-hybridization to specific telomeric sequence. Typical results shown of three studies. Average telomere fragment length is indicated below. ∗p < 0.05 by Student's t test, n = 3. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 5-15DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 AUF1 Stimulates mTERT Transcription (A) Nascent mTert transcript levels determined by intron-exon qRT-PCR. ∗p < 0.05. Error bars represent the SEM from three independent experiments. (B) Decay rates of mTert and mTerc RNAs. Plots are the average of three independent experiments. (C) Promoter regions of mTert, mTerc, IL-6, and Tk1 genes were detected by semiquantitative PCR from input and AUF1-bound immunoprecipitated chromatin samples from WT and KO MEFs. Representative negative images from ethidium-bromide stained agarose gels are shown. (D) Promoter-coupled luciferase constructs in WT and KO MEFs from mTert expression. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity of a cotransfected null-promoter plasmid. Length of mTERT promoter in each construct is indicated. ∗p < 0.05, ± SEM. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 5-15DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions