Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and.
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Ellen Nalivaika, Celia A. Schiffer  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2004)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Two Structures of Cyclophilin 40
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and.
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal structures of reduced, oxidized, and mutated human thioredoxins: evidence for a regulatory homodimer  Andrzej Weichsel, John R Gasdaska, Garth.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 605-614 (July 2001) Structure of the Bacillus Cell Fate Determinant SpoIIAA in Phosphorylated and Unphosphorylated Forms  Philippa R. Seavers, Richard J. Lewis, James A. Brannigan, Koen H.G. Verschueren, Garib N. Murshudov, Anthony J. Wilkinson  Structure  Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 605-614 (July 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2

Figure 1 The Interactions among SpoIIA Proteins and SpoIIE in the Regulation of σF Activity (a) SpoIIAB (AB) is both an anti-σ factor that can sequester σF (1) and a protein kinase that can phosphorylate SpoIIAA (AA) (2). SpoIIE (IIE) hydrolyses SpoIIAA-P (AA-P) (3). In the presence of unphosphorylated SpoIIAA, SpoIIAB can swap its σF partner for SpoIIAA (4). (b) In the larger mother cell compartment, the prevailing species are SpoIIAA-P and the SpoIIAB:σF complex. SpoIIE (shaded circles) localizes to the sporulation septum but is active only in the forespore where it dephosphorylates SpoIIAA-P leading to σF activation Structure 2001 9, 605-614DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2)

Figure 2 The Overall Fold of SpoIIAA (a) Ribbon tracing with the Cα and side chain atoms of Ser57 shown in ball-and-stick. (b) Stereo Cα trace with the N- and C-termini and every 10th residue labeled. This and subsequent figures were drawn with the program MOLSCRIPT [49] Structure 2001 9, 605-614DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2)

Figure 3 Electron Density Surrounding the Phosphorylatable Ser (a) Ser57 in unphosphorylated SpoIIAA(M86V), (b) the phosphorylated serine in the B molecule of SpoIIAA-P, and (c) the Ser-phosphates and the nearby His23 and His24 residues in adjacent molecules of the lattice. The Ser57-phosphate (SEP57) side chain has two conformations in molecule A. In the high-resolution maps, dual conformations of Met55 of molecule B and Ser57-phosphate of molecule A are evident. The atoms are colored according to their type: carbon is light blue, oxygen is red, nitrogen is blue, sulfur is yellow, and phosphorus is green. The electron density of the neighboring molecule in (c) is colored orange. In each case a 2Fo-Fc map is displayed and contoured at one standard deviation above the mean value of the electron density Structure 2001 9, 605-614DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2)

Figure 4 SpoIIAA Structural Comparisons Comparison of the overall structure of unphosphorylated SpoIIAA from B. sphaericus (green) with (a) the B molecule from the SpoIIAA-P crystal structure (cyan), (b) the average NMR structure of SpoIIAA from B. subtilis (red) [18], and (c) the A molecule of the SpoIIAA(M86V) crystal structure (magenta). The figure is a stereo plot of the course of the protein backbone. In (a) and (c) the structures were superimposed by least squares minimization of the rmsΔ of the Cα atom positions of residues 2–111. In (b) the superposition was based on the Cα positions of 21 equivalent atoms from strands 1–4 of the β sheet rmsΔ = 0.67 A ̊. The side chain and Cα atoms of Ser57 in unphosphorylated SpoIIAA are displayed in (a) while those of Met55 and Met86 are shown in (c). For clarity, residues 103 to the C terminus have been omitted. Note that the green traces are broken between residues 92 and 96 because the intervening residues are disordered in the unphosphorylated SpoIIAA structure Structure 2001 9, 605-614DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2)

Figure 5 Space Filling Views of the SpoIIAA Surface (a) View similar to that in Figure 2a illustrating the hydrophobic surface contiguous with the phosphorylatable Ser (SEP57, green). Other residues are colored according to type; positively charged residues (Arg, Lys, and His) are blue, negatively charged residues (Asp and Glu) are red, polar residues (Asn, Gln, Ser, and Thr) are yellow, and apolar residues are in gray. Selected residues referred to in the text are labeled. (b) View looking down onto SEP57 illustrating residues conserved among SpoIIAA homologues. SEP57 is again in green; residues invariant in 11 of the 12 SpoIIAA-like sequences are in yellow with the exceptions of Gly61 and Gly65, which are in red Structure 2001 9, 605-614DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2)

Figure 6 A SpoIIAA Dimer in the Crystal Stereo ribbon diagram illustrating the packing of the two molecules in the asymmetric unit of the SpoIIAA(M86V) crystals. The N- and C-termini and helices α2 and α3 are labeled. The close association of the α3-β5 loops and the α2 helices about a pseudo two-fold noncrystallographic symmetry axis is apparent Structure 2001 9, 605-614DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2)

Figure 7 Alignment of Anti-σ Factor Antagonist Sequences (1–12) SpoIIAA-like proteins from 1. B. sphaericus (AJ278291), 2. B. subtilis (P10727), 3. B. licheniformis (P26777), 4. B. anthracis (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/mdb/mdbinprogress.html), 5. B. coagulans (P70877), 6. B. stearothermophilus (O32726), 7. B. megaterium (P35147), 8. B. halodurans (Q9KCN3), 9. Paenibacillus polymyxa (O32720), 10. Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/mdb/mdbinprogress.html), 11. C. acetobutylicum (http://www.genomecorp.com/genesequences/clostridium/clospage.html), and 12. C. difficile (http://sanger.ac.uk/Projects/C_difficile/). Residues invariant in at least 11 of the 12 sequences are picked out in the consensus, Spo. (13–19) RsbV-like sequences: 13. B. anthracis (Q9K5J8), 14. Staphylococcus epidermidis (AAG23811), 15. Staphylococcus aureus (P95842), 16. B. halodurans (Q9Kff2), 17. B. subtilis (P17903), 18. B. licheniformis (O50230), and 19. Listeria monocytogenes (O85016). Residues invariant in at least 6 of the 7 sequences are picked out in the consensus Rsb. Con is the consensus sequence for anti-σ factor antagonists, given in bold if strictly conserved over the family. Other residues highlighted in bold represent the “signature” by which SpoIIA/RsbV families can be identified from their primary sequence. Semicolons denote conservation of amino acid residue based on physiochemical property, e.g., hydrophobicity or charge Structure 2001 9, 605-614DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00623-2)