Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Encoding of Both Analog- and Digital-like Behavioral Outputs by One C. elegans Interneuron Zhaoyu Li, Jie Liu, Maohua Zheng, X.Z. Shawn Xu Cell Volume.
Advertisements

Date of download: 9/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
A Low-Cost and High-Energy Hybrid Iron-Aluminum Liquid Battery Achieved by Deep Eutectic Solvents  Leyuan Zhang, Changkun Zhang, Yu Ding, Katrina Ramirez-Meyers,
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Implantable Solid Electrolyte Interphase in Lithium-Metal Batteries
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
On the Electrolytic Stability of Iron-Nickel Oxides
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Quan Pang, Xiao Liang, Abhinandan Shyamsunder, Linda F. Nazar  Joule 
4.0 V Aqueous Li-Ion Batteries
Quentin Michaudel, Brett P. Fors  Chem 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Lithium Metal Extraction from Seawater
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Direct Growth of Well-Aligned MOF Arrays onto Various Substrates
Zhen Li, Bu Yuan Guan, Jintao Zhang, Xiong Wen (David) Lou  Joule 
Template-Directed Growth of Well-Aligned MOF Arrays and Derived Self-Supporting Electrodes for Water Splitting  Guorui Cai, Wang Zhang, Long Jiao, Shu-Hong.
Lithium Metal Anodes: A Recipe for Protection
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Wei Wen, Jin-Ming Wu, Yin-Zhu Jiang, Lu-Lu Lai, Jian Song  Chem 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Sujong Chae, Minseong Ko, Kyungho Kim, Kihong Ahn, Jaephil Cho  Joule 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (November 2017)
High-Energy Li Metal Battery with Lithiated Host
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Interphase Engineering Enabled All-Ceramic Lithium Battery
What Limits the Performance of Ta3N5 for Solar Water Splitting?
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Bio-inspired Self-Healing Electrolytes for Li-S Batteries
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Xiaoqiao Zeng, Chun Zhan, Jun Lu, Khalil Amine  Chem 
14.1% Efficient Monolithically Integrated Solar Flow Battery
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Construction of Complex CoS Hollow Structures with Enhanced Electrochemical Properties for Hybrid Supercapacitors  Han Hu, Bu Yuan Guan, Xiong Wen (David)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Sujong Chae, Minseong Ko, Kyungho Kim, Kihong Ahn, Jaephil Cho  Joule 
Zhuangchai Lai, Ye Chen, Chaoliang Tan, Xiao Zhang, Hua Zhang  Chem 
Crumpled Graphene Balls Stabilized Dendrite-free Lithium Metal Anodes
Highly Fluorinated Interphases Enable High-Voltage Li-Metal Batteries
Chao Luo, Xiulin Fan, Zhaohui Ma, Tao Gao, Chunsheng Wang  Chem 
Reactivity-Guided Interface Design in Na Metal Solid-State Batteries
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (November 2017)
Yolk-Shell Architecture with Precision Expansion Void Control for Lithium Ion Batteries  Runwei Mo, David Rooney, Kening Sun  iScience 
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Lightweight Metallic MgB2 Mediates Polysulfide Redox and Promises High-Energy- Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries  Quan Pang, Chun Yuen Kwok, Dipan Kundu,
Hongcai Gao, Sen Xin, John B. Goodenough  Chem 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Xingwen Yu, Arumugam Manthiram
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Zhuangchai Lai, Ye Chen, Chaoliang Tan, Xiao Zhang, Hua Zhang  Chem 
Realizing Formation and Decomposition of Li2O2 on Its Own Surface with a Highly Dispersed Catalyst for High Round-Trip Efficiency Li-O2 Batteries  Li-Na.
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 19, Pages (September 2019)
Chemo-Mechanical Challenges in Solid-State Batteries
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Polynuclear Clusters: Bridging between Metal Ion and Metal Oxide
Fig. 2 Stabilizing the lithium-electrolyte interface.
Anode-Electrolyte Interfaces in Secondary Magnesium Batteries
STED Nanoscopy Goes Low Power
Metal-Organic Polyhedra to Control the Conductance of a Lipid Membrane
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 287-297 (August 2016) Graphite-Encapsulated Li-Metal Hybrid Anodes for High-Capacity Li Batteries  Yongming Sun, Guangyuan Zheng, Zhi Wei Seh, Nian Liu, Shuang Wang, Jie Sun, Hye Ryoung Lee, Yi Cui  Chem  Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 287-297 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.009 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Chem 2016 1, 287-297DOI: (10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Illustration of Different Types of Graphite with Li-Metal Deposition (A–D) Schematic illustration of (A) 2D graphite flakes and (B) MAG particles before and after Li-metal deposition and SEM images of (C) 2D graphite flakes and (D) MAG particles. (E) A cross-sectional SEM image showing the internal pore space in the MAG particle. Chem 2016 1, 287-297DOI: (10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Characterizations of MAG and 2D Flake Electrodes upon Li-Metal Deposition (A–C) SEM images of (A) MAG, (B) a 2D graphite-flake, and (C) copper-foil electrodes after Li-metal deposition with twice the capacity of conventional intercalation for a graphite anode. (D) Electrochemical Li deposition for MAG particles and 2D flakes. (E and F) XRD patterns of MAG and copper-foil electrodes after Li deposition at various stages. The dot-dash area in (E) shows the position of the strongest peak (110) of Li metal, which is magnified in (F). After Li deposition with three times the specific capacity of conventional intercalation, the MAG electrode exhibited a very weak and broad peak of Li metal. A much stronger and sharper peak for Li metal was observed for the copper foil after plating the same amount of Li. Chem 2016 1, 287-297DOI: (10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MAG Electrodes with Different Total Li-Metal Capacity and Current-Density Dependence (A–C) SEM images of a MAG electrode after Li deposition at 0.2 C with (A) 2, (B) 2.5, and (C) 3 times the capacity of conventional intercalation. After deposition of 2.5 times the Li intercalation capacity, Li dendrites grew out of the MAG electrode. Islands of Li dendrites formed and tended to interconnect with each other on the surface of the MAG electrode with three times the capacity of graphite intercalation. (D and E) SEM images of the MAG electrodes after Li deposition at (D) 0.4 and (E) 0.6 C with twice the capacity of conventional intercalation. When the current density increased to 0.4 C, Li dendrites were observed on the surface of MAG electrodes. Thus, at more than twice the Li intercalation capacity, the interior space of MAG was not enough to hold the Li metal, and the dendrites came out. On the other hand, even with enough interior space, Li dendrites grew out from the MAG when the current increased to 0.4 C. The growth of the Li dendrites was facilitated by increasing charging current densities. The current rate C was based on the intercalation specific capacity of graphite (372 mAh g−1). Chem 2016 1, 287-297DOI: (10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Electrochemical Performance of MAG-Li-Metal Hybrid Electrodes (A) Coulombic efficiency of MAG, 2D graphite-flake and copper-foil electrodes over cycling with Li metal as the reference and counter electrode. (B and C) Voltage profiles of a MAG electrode for the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 25th cycles. The voltage profile in (B) is expanded in (C) to show −0.1 to 0.3 V. (D) Voltage profiles for Li plating and stripping on a copper-foil electrode for the initial three cycles. (E) Voltage hysteresis of MAG and copper-foil electrodes over cycling. The current density was 0.2 C on the basis of the intercalation specific capacity of graphite (74.4 mA g−1). Chem 2016 1, 287-297DOI: (10.1016/j.chempr.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions