Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Shoutian Zhu, Kevin T. Mc Henry, William S. Lane, Gabriel Fenteany 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
An Enzyme that Regulates Ether Lipid Signaling Pathways in Cancer Annotated by Multidimensional Profiling  Kyle P. Chiang, Sherry Niessen, Alan Saghatelian,
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Jacqueline L. Blankman, Gabriel M. Simon, Benjamin F. Cravatt 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Mapping Proteome-wide Targets of Glyphosate in Mice
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Profiling Enzyme Activities In Vivo Using Click Chemistry Methods
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Exploring Metabolic Pathways and Regulation through Functional Chemoproteomic and Metabolomic Platforms  Daniel Medina-Cleghorn, Daniel K. Nomura  Chemistry.
A Photoreactive Small-Molecule Probe for 2-Oxoglutarate Oxygenases
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
The Ligand Binding Landscape of Diacylglycerol Kinases
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
How Chemoproteomics Can Enable Drug Discovery and Development
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Mechanism of Carbamate Inactivation of FAAH: Implications for the Design of Covalent Inhibitors and In Vivo Functional Probes for Enzymes  Jessica P.
Profiling Enzyme Activities In Vivo Using Click Chemistry Methods
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
The Efficacy of siRNAs against Hepatitis C Virus Is Strongly Influenced by Structure and Target Site Accessibility  Selena M. Sagan, Neda Nasheri, Christian.
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Proteasome Activation by Small Molecules
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Gregory C. Adam, Benjamin F. Cravatt, Erik J. Sorensen* 
Characterization of Monoacylglycerol Lipase Inhibition Reveals Differences in Central and Peripheral Endocannabinoid Metabolism  Jonathan Z. Long, Daniel.
Jae Won Chang, Daniel K. Nomura, Benjamin F. Cravatt 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages e8 (November 2017)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
An Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Identifies a Mechanistically Unique Inhibitor of Protein Sumoylation  Yeong Sang Kim, Katelyn Nagy, Samantha Keyser,
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages e7 (November 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Xinxin Gao, Rami N. Hannoush  Cell Chemical Biology 
Probes to Monitor Activity of the Paracaspase MALT1
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Aaron T. Wright, Benjamin F. Cravatt  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Katherine T. Barglow, Benjamin F. Cravatt  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Mechanism of Carbamate Inactivation of FAAH: Implications for the Design of Covalent Inhibitors and In Vivo Functional Probes for Enzymes  Jessica P.
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 928-937 (July 2015) Selective N-Hydroxyhydantoin Carbamate Inhibitors of Mammalian Serine Hydrolases  Armand B. Cognetta, Micah J. Niphakis, Hyeon-Cheol Lee, Michael L. Martini, Jonathan J. Hulce, Benjamin F. Cravatt  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 928-937 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.018 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2015 22, 928-937DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2015 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Synthesis and Initial Characterization of NHH Carbamates as Inhibitors of SHs (A) Representative classes of carbamate inhibitors of SHs, with variable leaving groups in red and potential sites for structural elaboration in blue. NHS carbamates (middle) were prioritized for further exploration over hexafluoroisopropyl (top) or O-aryl (bottom) carbamates due to the synthetic tractability and structural diversification afforded by their elaboration (right). (B) Structures of representative NHH carbamates tested for SH inhibition by gel-based competitive ABPP and their in vitro inhibition profiles in a mouse brain membrane proteome. Brain proteome was pre-treated with NHH carbamates (20 μM, 30 min, 37°C) followed by reaction with FP-Rh (1 μM, 30 min, room temperature) and analysis by SDS-PAGE and in-gel fluorescence scanning. (C) Concentration-dependent competitive gel-based ABPP (left) and ABPP-SILAC (right) analyses of JJH221 (4). Gel-based ABPP corresponds to mouse brain membrane proteome. For the ABPP-SILAC analysis, heavy- and light-isotopically labeled PC3 cells were treated with JJH221 (20 μM, 4 hr) or DMSO, respectively, prior to processing for ABPP-SILAC. SHs showing SILAC ratios (JJH221/DMSO) of less than 0.33 were considered targets of JJH221. Data represent average values ± SD for two independent experiments. (D) Concentration-dependent inhibition of mouse brain membrane SHs by representative NHH carbamates as measured by gel-based competitive ABPP. SH targets of the tested NHH carbamates are marked on the right side of the gel. Assignment of SH enzyme activities in competitive ABPP gels are based on gel migration patterns consistent with past studies (e.g., Blankman et al., 2007; Hoover et al., 2008). Chemistry & Biology 2015 22, 928-937DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 NHH Carbamate Inhibitors of ABHD3 and ABHD4 (A) Recombinant expression of mouse ABHD3 and human ABHD4 by transient transfection in HEK293T cells and detection of both enzymes in a combined lysate of transfected cells by gel-based ABPP with the FP-Rh probe. (B) NHH carbamates screened against recombinant ABHD3 and ABHD4. (C) Concentration-dependent inhibition of ABHD3 and ABHD4 by NHH carbamates using gel-based competitive ABPP. See Figure S2 for curves used to generate the reported IC50 values. Data represent average values and 95% confidence limits (CI) for three independent experiments. (D) ABPP-SILAC analysis using FP-biotin as a probe to enrich SHs, showing overlaid in situ SH inhibition profiles for ABC47 (10) (500 nM, 4 hr) and ABC34 (13) (1 μM, 4 hr) in PC3 cells. Data represent average values ± SD for two independent experiments. Chemistry & Biology 2015 22, 928-937DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Discovery of PPT1 as a Target of NHH Carbamates (A) Structure of the click probe ABC45 and its reactivity with recombinant ABHD4 in transfected cell lysates. Left side of gel shows a competitive ABPP gel of ABHD3/ABHD4-transfected cell lysates treated with the indicated concentrations of ABC45 (30 min, 37°C) followed by FP-Rh. Right side of gel shows direct labeling of ABHD4 and other SHs by ABC45 as measured by CuAAC to an Rh-N3 tag. (B) ABPP-SILAC analysis showing the in situ SH inhibition profile for ABC34 (13) (1 μM, 4 hr) in PC3 cells, where SH enrichment and inhibition were measured with the ABC45 probe. Data represent average values ± SD for two independent experiments. (C) ABPP-SILAC analysis comparing the reactivity and enrichment of SHs with FP-biotin (2.5 μM, 1 hr) versus ABC45 (5 μM, 1 hr) in PC3 cell proteomes. Data represent average values ± SD for two independent experiments. (D) Verification that recombinant human PPT1 expressed by transient transfection in HEK293T cells reacts with ABC45 (1 μM), but not FP-Rh (1 μM), and the ABC45 reactivity is blocked by ABC34 (5 μM, 4 hr). PNGaseF treatment causes a shift in PPT1 signals by SDS-PAGE, consistent with the reported glycosylation state of this protein (Camp et al., 1994; Lyly et al., 2007). Upper, ABPP gel; lower, anti-PPT1 western blot. (E) ABC45 labels recombinant wild-type PPT1, but not the catalytic serine mutant (S115A) of this enzyme. All samples were treated with PNGaseF prior to analysis by gel-based ABPP. (F) ABC45 labels the catalytic serine S115 of recombinant PPT1 as determined by isoTOP-ABPP analysis of PPT1-transfected cell lysates. Asterisk in the ABC45-modified tryptic peptide corresponds to the predicted site of ABC45 modification (S115) as determined by tandem MS analysis. Asterisk located on the MS1 peak for the ABC45-modified tryptic peptide marks the time point of MS2 acquisition. Chemistry & Biology 2015 22, 928-937DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Discovery of Cell-Active NHH Carbamate Inhibitors of PPT1 and ABHD4 (A) Screening of a subset of NHH carbamates in hPPT1-transfected HEK293T cells in situ, where PPT1 inhibition was measured by competitive ABPP using the ABC45 probe. Structures of the tested compounds are shown below the ABPP gel. (B) hPPT1-transfected cell lysates show much greater hydrolytic activity with the MU-6S-Palm-βD-Glc substrate compared with mock-transfected cell lysates or hPPT1-transfected cell lysates pre-treated with ABC44 (17) (50 μM, 30 min). Data represent average values ± SE for three independent experiments. (C) Concentration-dependent inhibition of MU-6S-Palm-βD-Glc hydrolytic activity of hPPT1-transfected cell lysates by ABC44 (17), ABC51 (14), and JJH254 (7). Data represent average values ± SE for three independent experiments. (D) PC3 cells treated in situ with ABC44, but not ABC51 (500 nM inhibitor; 4 hr) showed substantial reductions in 4-MU-6S-Palm-βD-Glc hydrolysis activity compared with DMSO-treated control cells. Data represent average values ± SE for three independent experiments. (E) ABPP-SILAC analysis showing overlaid in situ SH inhibition profiles for ABC44 (0.1 μM, 4 hr) and ABC51 (1 μM, 4 hr) in PC3 cells where SH enrichment and inhibition were measured with the FP-biotin (left) or ABC45 (right) probes. Data represent average values ± SD for two independent experiments. Chemistry & Biology 2015 22, 928-937DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 NHH Carbamates Inhibit PPT1 and Other SHs In Vivo Gel-based competitive ABPP analysis of SH activities in tissues from mice treated with ABC44 (17) (A) or JJH254 (7) (B). The activities of ABHD4 and PPT1 were visualized using the ABC45 probe in tissue proteomes treated with PNGaseF (post-ABC45 labeling), while the activities of LYPLA1 and LYPLA2 were visualized using the FP-Rh probe. Chemistry & Biology 2015 22, 928-937DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions