Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages (September 2000)
Deletion of the Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene and Haploinsufficiency of Telomere Maintenance in Cri du Chat Syndrome  Anju Zhang, Chengyun Zheng,
Johanna Sigl-Glöckner, Michael Brecht  Cell Reports 
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors  Kazutoshi Takahashi, Shinya Yamanaka  Cell 
Reprogramming after Chromosome Transfer into Mouse Blastomeres
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Spatial and temporal distribution of Oct-4 and acetylated H4K5 in rabbit embryos  Chien-Hong Chen, Wei-Fang Chang, Chia-Chia Liu, Hwa-Yun Su, Song-Kun.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Genome-wide Association and Follow-Up Replication Studies Identified ADAMTS18 and TGFBR3 as Bone Mass Candidate Genes in Different Ethnic Groups  Dong-Hai.
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Jan-Philipp Mallm, Karsten Rippe  Cell Reports 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Transcription within a Functional Human Centromere
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (July 2018)
A Single Templating RNA in Yeast Telomerase
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
Mouse SCNT ESCs Have Lower Somatic Mutation Load Than Syngeneic iPSCs
Volume 123, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Generating Late-Onset Human iPSC-Based Disease Models by Inducing Neuronal Age- Related Phenotypes through Telomerase Manipulation  Elsa Vera, Nazario.
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Johanna Sigl-Glöckner, Michael Brecht  Cell Reports 
Volume 10, Issue 22, Pages (November 2000)
Viable Rat-Mouse Chimeras: Where Do We Go from Here?
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1-10 (July 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Application of three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization to human preimplantation genetic diagnosis  Li-Ying Yan, Ph.D., Jie Qiao, M.D., Yuan.
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Germline Competent Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Rat Blastocysts
A Single Templating RNA in Yeast Telomerase
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Alterations in mRNA 3′ UTR Isoform Abundance Accompany Gene Expression Changes in Human Huntington’s Disease Brains  Lindsay Romo, Ami Ashar-Patel, Edith.
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Malkiel A. Cohen, Styliani Markoulaki, Rudolf Jaenisch 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Franziska Aurich, Christian Dahmann  Cell Reports 
SIRT1 Is Necessary for Proficient Telomere Elongation and Genomic Stability of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells  Maria Luigia De Bonis, Sagrario Ortega,
A Transcriptional Logic for Nuclear Reprogramming
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (August 2017)
Junjiu Huang, Maja Okuka, Mark McLean, David L. Keefe, Lin Liu 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Derivation of Mouse Haploid Trophoblast Stem Cells
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 1603-1609 (December 2014) Telomere Elongation and Naive Pluripotent Stem Cells Achieved from Telomerase Haplo-Insufficient Cells by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer  Li-Ying Sung, Wei-Fang Chang, Qian Zhang, Chia-Chia Liu, Jun-Yang Liou, Chia-Chun Chang, Huan Ou-Yang, Renpeng Guo, Haifeng Fu, Winston T.K. Cheng, Shih-Torng Ding, Chuan-Mu Chen, Maja Okuka, David L. Keefe, Y. Eugene Chen, Lin Liu, Jie Xu  Cell Reports  Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 1603-1609 (December 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.052 Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2014 9, 1603-1609DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.052) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Production of All Terc+/− ntESC Pups by Tetraploid Embryo Complementation Assay (A) Morphology of cloned embryos at blastocyst stage. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (B) Morphology of ntESCs at Passage 5 under transmitted microscopy. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (C) Illustration of the tetraploid embryo complementation assay. A tetraploid embryo at blastocyst stage (shown in orange) is used as the host embryo. The ntESCs (shown in blue) are injected into host embryos followed by embryo transfer. The tetraploid host embryo will only contribute to the placenta (orange), whereas all embryonic tissues are originated from ntESC (blue). (D) Microscopic images of ntESC injection in the TEC assay. Scale bar represents 25 μm. (E) Success rates of ntESC pups by TEC assays. 4N-BL, tetraploid blastocyst. (F) Confirmation of specific origin of Terc+/−ntESC clones by microsatellite genotyping using D18Mit17 primers (top gel) and D12Mit136 primers (bottom gel). M, molecular marker. 1: Terc+/− donor fibroblast cells. 2: Terc+/−ntESC line 7. 3–5: pups derived from Terc+/− ntESC line 7. 6–8: placenta from Terc+/−ntESC clones. 9: WT B6 mouse. 10: ICR mouse. 11: BDF1 mouse. N, blank. Samples from Terc+/− fibroblast donor cells, Terc+/−ntESC line 7, and ntESC pups (lanes 1–5) show a single band (top arrow, ∼213 bp) for D18Mit17, and a single band (bottom arrow, ∼147 bp) for D12Mit136, the same pattern as WT C57BL/6 mouse (lane 9); whereas samples from placenta (lanes 6–8, ICR origin), surrogate mouse (lane 10, ICR), and oocyte donor (lane 11, BDF1) show different patterns with two bands for D18Mit17 (∼188 and 213 bp) and a band at ∼191 bp for D12Mit136. (G) Surrogate mouse (ICR origin, albino coat, and red eyes). (H) Newborn pups derived entirely from Terc+/− ntESCs (black eyes). (I) Adult Terc+/− ntESC Clone 3 (black coat and black eyes from C57BL/6 origin). (J) Three adult Terc+/−ntESC clones. (K) Pups fathered by Clone 3 after breeding with a WT C57BL/6 female. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1603-1609DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.052) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Telomere Lengths in ntESCs (A) Relative T/S ratio (mean ± SEM) in ntESCs of different genotypes. TTF, tail-tip fibroblast. Comparisons within the same genotype were made with TTF. (B) TRF analysis of ntESCs. (C) Histogram shows distribution of relative telomere length expressed as fluorescence intensity (TFU). Heavy black bars on the y axis indicated by arrows show number of telomere signal-free ends. Average telomere length is shown as mean TFU ± SD. TTF, tail-tip fibroblast donor cells. Numbers following genotype indicate ntESC line number. (D) Representative telomere Q-FISH images of ntESCs at P6. Telomeres are labeled with telomere PNA probes (green), and chromosomes labeled with DAPI (blue). Red arrows: telomere free ends, indicative of telomere loss. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figures S2 and S3. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1603-1609DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.052) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Telomere Lengths in All Terc+/− ntESC Cloned Pups (A) Relative T/S ratio (mean ± SEM) in Terc+/− ntESCs, in TTFs of clones and their corresponding placentas. ntESCs: Terc+/− ntESC line 5. (B) Relative T/S ratio (mean ± SEM) in ntESCs, and in the TTFs of Clone 3 at different ages. Cell Reports 2014 9, 1603-1609DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.052) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions