Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Structural Changes in TAF4b-TFIID Correlate with Promoter Selectivity
The Unique N Terminus of the UbcH10 E2 Enzyme Controls the Threshold for APC Activation and Enhances Checkpoint Regulation of the APC  Matthew K. Summers,
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Chaoyou Xue, Natalie R. Whitis, Dipali G. Sashital  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Structural Basis of Rho GTPase-Mediated Activation of the Formin mDia1
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Jerzy Majka, Anita Niedziela-Majka, Peter M.J. Burgers  Molecular Cell 
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Eukaryotic Transcription Activation: Right on Target
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Yuan Lin, David S.W. Protter, Michael K. Rosen, Roy Parker 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Dipali G. Sashital, Blake Wiedenheft, Jennifer A. Doudna 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
MAGE-RING Protein Complexes Comprise a Family of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Andrew J. Deans, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Structural Basis for Recognition of Diubiquitins by NEMO
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Iwr1 Directs RNA Polymerase II Nuclear Import
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Replication-Independent Repair of DNA Interstrand Crosslinks
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Enhancement of BLM-DNA2-Mediated Long-Range DNA End Resection by CtIP
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 176-187 (July 2015) Promotion of BRCA2-Dependent Homologous Recombination by DSS1 via RPA Targeting and DNA Mimicry  Weixing Zhao, Sivaraja Vaithiyalingam, Joseph San Filippo, David G. Maranon, Judit Jimenez-Sainz, Gerald V. Fontenay, Youngho Kwon, Stanley G. Leung, Lucy Lu, Ryan B. Jensen, Walter J. Chazin, Claudia Wiese, Patrick Sung  Molecular Cell  Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 176-187 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Enhancement of miBRCA2 Activity by DSS1 (A) Schematic of BRCA2 and miBRCA2 with various functional domains. (B) SDS-PAGE of purified miBRCA2 (lane 1) and miBRCA2-DSS1 complex (lane 3). Size markers were run in lane 2. (C) Schematic of the homologous DNA pairing reaction. (D) The miBRCA2-DSS1 complex or miBRCA2 without and with DSS1 tested in homologous pairing reactions with ssDNA coated with RPA or SSB. The mean values (± SD) of data from three independent experiments were plotted. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DSS1-Mediated Attenuation of ssDNA Binding by RPA (A) GST pull-down assay to test for the interaction of RPA with DSS1. The supernatant (S), the wash (W), and the eluate (E) fractions were analyzed. (B) Pulldown assay as in (A) to test for interaction of DSS1 with E. coli SSB. (C) The effect of DSS1 on DNA binding by RPA or SSB was examined. The mean values (± SD) of data from three independent experiments were plotted. Note treatment with SDS and proteinase K (SDS/PK) released DNA from RPA or SSB. See also Figures S2 and S4. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Evidence for RPA70 Interaction Activity and DNA Mimicry in DSS1 (A) Schematic of the RPA subunits RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14 with functional domains. (B) Overlay of 15N-1HSQC spectra of 15N-enriched RPA70NAB as the solution was titrated with DSS1. The circles identify peaks belonging to RPA70N. The solid and dotted arrows indicate significant chemical shift perturbations upon binding of DSS1 for residues within RPA70AB and 70N, respectively. (C) Chemical shift changes plotted against the sequence of RPA70NAB. The mean value of chemical shift changes is shown by the solid horizontal line. (D) Overlay of 15N-1HSQC spectra of 15N-enriched DSS1 in complex with unlabeled RPA70NAB at molar ratios of 1:0 (black), 1:0.2 (red), 1:0.4 (blue), and 1:1 (yellow). The black and red dotted arrows identify peaks with chemical shift preturbations arsing from interaction with 70N and with 70AB, respectively. (E) Overlay of 15N-1HSQC spectra of 15N-enriched DSS1 in complex with unlabeled RPA70NAB and ssDNA. Spectra were acquired at DSS1:RPA70NAB:ssDNA ratios of 1:0:0 (black), 1:1:0 (purple), 1:1:0.5 (cyan) and 1:1:1 (red) molar ratios. Red arrows identify two peaks that revert to the position of free DSS1 upon addition of ssDNA due to release of DSS1 by ssDNA binding to RPA70AB. Black arrows identify two peaks that are not affected by addition of ssDNA because they interact with RPA70N. See also Figures S2 and S3. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Importance of DSS1-RPA Interaction in Efficacy of miBRCA-DSS1 (A) DSS1 residues (underlined) involved in BRCA2 interaction and solvent-exposed residues (red) in the Brca2-Dss1 crystal structure (Yang et al., 2002) targeted for mutagenesis. (B) GST pull-down assay to test for the interaction of RPA with DSS1 or the DSS18A mutant. The supernatant (S), the wash (W), and the eluate (E) fractions were analyzed. The asterisks highlight minor proteolytic products and contaminants in the GST-DSS18A preparation. (C) GST pull-down assay as in (B) to test for the interaction of RPA with miBRCA2-DSS1 and miBRCA2-DSS18A. (D) miBRCA2-DSS1 and miBRCA2-DSS18A were tested for their recombination mediator activity. The mean values (± SD) of data from three independent experiments were plotted. See also Figures S1, S4, and S5. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Relevance of DSS1-RPA Interaction for the Recombination Mediator Activity of BRCA2-DSS1 (A) SDS-PAGE of purified BRCA2-DSS1 (lane 2), BRCA2-DSS18A (lane 3), and BRCA2 (lane 4). Size markers were run in lane 1. (B) MPB-pulldown assay to test for the interaction between RPA and BRCA2, BRCA2-DSS1, or BRCA2-DSS18A. (C) BRCA2, BRCA2-DSS1, and BRCA2-DSS18A were tested for their recombination mediator activity with RPA-coated ssDNA or SSB-coated ssDNA. The mean values (± SD) of data from three independent experiments were plotted. See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Biological Relevance of the DSS1-RPA Complex (A) Schematic of the HR assay with the DR-GFP reporter in DR-U2OS cells (adapted from Schlacher et al., 2011) (B) Quantification of results from the HR assays in DR-U2OS cells with stable expression of Myc-DSS1res or Myc-DSS18Ares and after DSS1 or BRCA2 knockdown and I-SceI expression. GFP-positive cells indicate the fraction of successfully completed HR events. The mean values (± SD) from three independent experiments were plotted. (C) Representative micrographs of RAD51 foci (green) in HeLa cell nuclei at 8 hr after exposure to 8 Gy X-rays. Blue: DAPI. (D) Quantification of RAD51 foci at various time points after exposure to 8 Gy X-rays or sham irradiation. The mean values ± SEM of at least three independent experiments are shown. n.s., not significant; ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. (E) Survival curves of HeLa cells with stable expression of Myc-DSS1res or Myc-DSS18Ares after the treatment with increasing concentrations of Olaparib or MMC. The mean values (± SD) from three independent experiments were plotted. See also Figure S6. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for DSS1 Functions in BRCA2-RAD51-Mediated HR DSS1 promotes the loading of BRCA2-RAD51 onto RPA-coated ssDNA to facilitate RAD51-ssDNA filament assembly through its ability to (i) physically interact with RPA and (ii) attenuate the affinity of RPA for ssDNA. See also Figure S7. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 176-187DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions