Radiation from Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
Advertisements

A potential difference V is maintained between the metal target and the collector cup Electrons ejected from C travel to A and G detects the flow Apply.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in 2003/2004 Presented By Manasvita Joshi Ohio University, Athens, OH ISCRA, Erice, Italy 2006.
2. The Particle-like Properties Of Electromagnetic Radiation
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
The Phase-Resolved Spectra of the Crab Pulsar Jianjun Jia Jan 3, 2006.
GRB Afterglow Spectra Daniel Perley Astro September* 2005 * International Talk Like a Pirate Day.
Svetlana Jorstad Connection between X-ray and Polarized Radio Emission in the Large-Scale Jets of Quasars.
GLAST Science LunchDec 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/21 Can emission at higher energies provide insight into the physics of shocks and how the GRB inner.
GRB Prompt Emission: Turbulence, Magnetic Field & Jitter Radiation Jirong Mao.
Outflow Residual Collisions and Optical Flashes Zhuo Li (黎卓) Weizmann Inst, Israel moving to Peking Univ, Beijing Li & Waxman 2008, ApJL.
Collisionless shocks in Gamma Ray Bursts Current results and future perspectives. Århus, September 2005 Troels Haugbølle Dark Cosmology.
A Model for Emission from Microquasar Jets: Consequences of a Single Acceleration Episode We present a new model of emission from jets in Microquasars,
Modeling GRB B Xuefeng Wu (X. F. Wu, 吴雪峰 ) Penn State University Purple Mountain Observatory 2008 Nanjing GRB Workshop, Nanjing, China, June
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Radiation from Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Shinya Sugiyama, Rice University Acknowledgements: Scott Wilks, Bruce.
Particle Acceleration and Radiation from Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Rice University Acknowledgements: Scott Wilks,
Comoving Acceleration by Relativistic Poynting Flux Edison Liang Rice University Acknowledgements: Kasumi Nishimura, Koichi Noguchi (Japan); Peter Gary,
Modelling of the Effects of Return Current in Flares Michal Varady 1,2 1 Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2 J.E.
Highlights of talk : 1.e+e- pair laser production 1.Collisionless shocks 1.Colliding laser pulses accelerator.
1 Chapter 3 Electromagnetic Theory, Photons and Light September 5,8 Electromagnetic waves 3.1 Basic laws of electromagnetic theory Lights are electromagnetic.
Turbulence Heating and Nonthermal Radiation From MRI-induced Accretion onto Low-Luminosity Black Holes E.Liang, G.Hilburn, S.M.Liu, H. Li, C. Gammie, M.
Radiative transfer and photospheric emission in GRB jets Indrek Vurm (Columbia University) in collaboration with Andrei M. Beloborodov (Columbia University)
Spectra of partially self-absorbed jets Christian Kaiser University of Southampton Christian Kaiser University of Southampton.
Particle Acceleration The observation of high-energy  -rays from space implies that particles must be accelerated to very high energies (up to ~
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2010 Fermi Symposium 9 – 12 May 2011 Rome Italy K.-I. Nishikawa.
Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University Levinson+Bromberg PRL 08 Bromberg et al. ApJ 11 Levinson ApJ 12 Katz et al. ApJ 10 Budnik et al. ApJ 10 Nakar+Sari ApJ.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
The acceleration and radiation in the internal shock of the gamma-ray bursts ~ Smoothing Effect on the High-Energy Cutoff by Multiple Shocks ~ Junichi.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
The peak energy and spectrum from dissipative GRB photospheres Dimitrios Giannios Physics Department, Purdue Liverpool, June 19, 2012.
Radiation spectra from relativistic electrons moving in turbulent magnetic fields Yuto Teraki & Fumio Takahara Theoretical Astrophysics Group Osaka Univ.,
Magnetowave Induced Plasma Wakefield Acceleration for UHECR Guey-Lin Lin National Chiao-Tung University and Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle astrophysics,
November 1 - 3, nd East Asia Numerical Astrophysics Meeting KASI, Korea Shock Waves and Cosmic Rays in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe.
Gamma-Ray Burst Working Group Co-conveners: Abe Falcone, Penn State, David A. Williams, UCSC,
UNR activities in FSC Y. Sentoku and T. E. Cowan $40K from FSC to support a graduate student, Brian Chrisman, “Numerical modeling of fast ignition physics”.
Radiation from Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Shinya Sugiyama, Rice University Acknowledgements: Scott Wilks, Bruce.
Rice 05/15/07 Simulations: Anatoly Spitkovsky (Princeton) Luis Silva and the Plasma Simulation Group (Portugal) Ken Nishikawa (U. Alabama, Huntsville)
Gamma-ray Bursts from Synchrotron Self-Compton Emission Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland Boris Stern AstroSpace Center, Lebedev Phys. Inst., Moscow,
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2009 Fermi Symposium 2-5 November 2009 Hyatt Regency Washington,
The prompt optical emission in the Naked Eye Burst R. Hascoet with F. Daigne & R. Mochkovitch (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) Kyoto − Deciphering then.
Fermi Several Constraints by Fermi Zhuo Li ( 黎卓 ) Department of Astronomy, Peking University Kavli Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics 23 August, Xiamen.
Slow heating, fast cooling in gamma-ray bursts Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland +Boris Stern + Indrek Vurm.
Particle Acceleration and Radiation of Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Rice University Acknowledgements: Scott Wilks,
Magnetized Shocks & Prompt GRB Emission
Thermal electrons in GRB afterglows, or
Photon breeding mechanism in jets and its observational signatures
Relativistic Plasmas in Astrophysics and in Laser Experiments I:
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Origin of Quantum Theory
Broadband Properties of Blazars
Trivia Question Human vision (in daylight) is based on three color receptors which are sensitive to Red, Green, and Blue light. Hence RGB monitors… How.
Les sursauts gamma : la phase des chocs internes.
A Turbulent Local Environment
Dmitri Uzdensky (University of Colorado Boulder)
Relativistic Plasmas in Astrophysics and in Laser Experiments II:
Junior Research Fellow,
Particle acceleration and the microphysics of gamma-ray burst shocks
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Electron Energization and Radiation in
Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Orestes Hastings, Rice University
Chapter 27 Early Quantum Theory
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Chapter 3 Electromagnetic Theory, Photons and Light
Heavy-Ion Acceleration and Self-Generated Waves in Coronal Shocks
Arianna Ligorini Department of Gamma-ray Astrophysics Institute of Nuclear Physics PAS, Krakow Jacek Niemiec Department of Gamma-ray Astrophysics Institute.
Chromospheric and Transition Region Dynamics
Can we probe the Lorentz factor of gamma-ray bursts from GeV-TeV spectra integrated over internal shocks ? Junichi Aoi (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) co-authors:
Modeling polarization from relativistic outflows
Afterglow Radiation from Gamma-Ray Bursts
Presentation transcript:

Radiation from Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Shinya Sugiyama, Rice University Acknowledgements: Scott Wilks, Bruce Langdon Bruce Remington Talk given at Glast Symposium 2007 (see http://spacibm.rice.edu/~liang/picsim and spacibm.rice.edu/~knoguchi)

Popular Paradigms for the radiation of relativistic outflows in GRBs & Blazars B PIC sims can address difficult microphysics G >>1 e+e- ions e+e- shock g-rays SSC, EC… g-rays What is energy source? How are the e+e/ion accelerated? How do they radiate? Internal shocks Hydrodynamic Outflow Poynting flux Electro-magnetic -dominated outflow

Highlight We have developed a Particle-In-Cell code that simultaneously computes total radiation output from each superparticle. We find that in-situ radiation output of highest energy electrons accelerated by Poynting Flux (and some Collisionless Shocks) are much below that predicted by the classical synchrotron formula. This may solve the problem of too rapid synchrotron cooling in many internal shock models of GRBs.

radiated simultaneously from the force terms Question: How do particles radiate while they are being accelerated to high energies? We compute the power radiated simultaneously from the force terms used in the particle movers of the PIC code: Prad = 2e2(F|| 2+ g2F+2) /3m3c where F|| is force along v and F+ is force orthogonal to v (we have carefully calibrated our procedure against analytic results)

In Poynting flux acceleration, most energetic particles ~ comoving with local EM field Prad ~ We2g2sin4a << Psyn ~We2g2 where a is angle between v and Poynting vector k. By p a k a << 1 in the limit Ez ~ By and g ~ gwave Ez critical frequency wcr ~ Weg2sin2a << wcrsyn~ Weg2

Relativistic Poynting Flux Acceleration via induced j x B(ponderomotive) force EM pulse Entering By Plasma JxB force pushes all surface particles upstream: <g> ~ max(B2/4pnmec2, ao) “Leading Ponderomotive Accelerator” (LPA) By x y z Ez Jz JxB k Ez Jz x Exiting Plasma JxB force pulls out surface particles. Loaded EM pulse (speed < c) stays in-phase with the fastest particles, but gets “lighter” as slower particles fall behind. It accelerates indefinitely over time: <g> >> B2 /4pnmec2, ao “Trailing Ponderomotive Accelerator” (TPA). (Liang et al. PRL 90, 085001, 2003) x

Electrons accelerated by LPA radiate at a level ~ 10- 4 of classical synchrotron formula, due to sina ~ pz/px ≤ 0.1 g2We2~105 Prad px By Prad pz x Panalytic ~We2g2sin4a

Evolution of e+e- plasma accelerated by Poynting flux (LPA) shows decline of radiative power output Prad despite increase of g Prad By px 50

Relativistic Poynting Flux Acceleration via induced j x B(ponderomotive) force EM pulse Entering By Plasma JxB force pushes all surface particles upstream: <g> ~ max(B2/4pnmec2, ao) “Leading Ponderomotive Accelerator” (LPA) By x y z Ez Jz JxB k Ez Jz x Exiting Plasma JxB force pulls out surface particles. Loaded EM pulse (speed < c) stays in-phase with the fastest particles, but gets “lighter” as slower particles fall behind. It accelerates indefinitely over time: <g> >> B2 /4pnmec2, ao “Trailing Ponderomotive Accelerator” (TPA). (Liang et al. PRL 90, 085001, 2003) x

Occurs whenever EM- dominated plasma is rapidly unconfined t.We=800 t.We=10000 TPA Occurs whenever EM- dominated plasma is rapidly unconfined (Liang & Nishimura PRL 91, 175005 2004) magnify We/wpe =10

Fourier peak wavelength scales as ~ c.gm/ wpe tWe=1000 hard-to-soft GRB spectral evolution 5000 10000 diverse and complex BATSE light curves 18000 Fourier peak wavelength scales as ~ c.gm/ wpe

TPA produces Power-Law spectra with low-energy cut-off. Peak Lorentz factor gm corresponds roughly to the profile/group velocity of the EM pulse Typical GRB spectrum gm b=(n+1)/2 the maximum gmax ~ e E(t)bzdt /mc where E(t) is the comoving electric field

m(t) = (2fe(t)t + Co)1/2 t ≥ Lo/c e/wep=10 e/wep=100 f=1.33 Co=27.9 m(t) = (2fe(t)t + Co)1/2 t ≥ Lo/c Bulk Lorentz factor grows as ~square-root of time

The power-law index (p ~ 3 - 4) is remarkably robust independent of initial plasma size or temperature and only weakly dependent on B Lo=105rce Photon Index n=(p+1)/2 ~ 2 -2.5 f(g) Lo= 104rce -3.5 g

Prad from TPA << Psyn g2We2~3x106 Prad By*100 px 300 x

for the highest energy particles In TPA, we also find Prad ~ Panalytic for the highest energy particles Prad Panalytic ~We2g2sin4a

In TPA jets, Prad asymptotes to ~ constant level at late times as increase in g is compensated by decrease in a and B Prad Prad x x Lo=105c/We Lo=120c/We po=10

can slow or stop PF acceleration (Sugiyama et al 2005) Inverse Compton scattering against ambient photons can slow or stop PF acceleration (Sugiyama et al 2005) ng=10-4ne ng=10-2ne ng=ne 1 eV photon field We/wpe=100

We have studied radiation from Collisionless Shocks 3 Examples: e+e-/e+e- Magnetic Shock (B2 ~ bulk KE) e+e- /e-ion Magnetic Shock (B2 ~ bulk KE) e+e- Nonmagnetic Shocks (B2 << bulk KE)

Poynting jet running into cool e-ion ambient plasma (movie by Noguchi)

Magnetized collisionless shock produced by collision of e+e- Poynting Jet with cold e-ion plasma . 100pxi 100By 100Ex f(g) ejecta e+ -10pxe -10pxej ambient ion ejecta e- radiative shock layer ambient e- g x

The radiative shock layer bifurcates and gets thicker with time due to ion drag, but max Prad stays ~ constant Prad x swept-up e-

SUMMARY Radiation power of Poynting Flux acceleration are orders of magnitude below classical synchrotron formula due to Force ~ parallel to velocity. This feature may be generic and also apply to some Collisionless Shocks. 2. Structure and radiation power of collisionless shocks are highly sensitive to magnetization and ion loading. Shocked radiative layer is much thicker and bifurcates in e-ion shocks.. 3. Inverse Compton of external photons may dominate synchrotron and SSC. 4. Critical frequency of PF acceleration radiation is much lower than the classical synchrotron critical frequency.

Details of TPA expansion E+e- slab run Momentum gets more and more Anisotropic with time: pz/px<<1

Magnetic Shock of e+e- sweeping up cold ambient e+e- shows broad (>> c/We, c/wpe) transition region with 3-phases (nej=40no) By*100 px ejecta ambient f(g) decelerated ejecta spectral evolution swept-up ambient spectral evolution g g

Both ejecta and swept-up electrons are highly anisotropic: pz<<px

The radiative layer is very thin Prad of swept-up electron is lower than Prad of decelerating ejecta electron. The radiative layer is very thin Prad x x Swept-up ambient e- ejecta e-

Comparison of collisionless shocks: e+e- shocking B=0 e+e- cold plasma ejecta: hi-B, hi-g weak-B, moderate g B=0, low g 100By ejecta px 100By 100Ex 100By swept-up px 100Ex -px swept-up -pxswrpt-up ~ -3 power-law ~ -3 power-law no power-law swept-up f(g) f(g) f(g) ejecta ejecta swept-up swept-up g g g

Nonmagnetic e+e-/e+e- shock: Radiation not Dominated By Weibel turbulence Ex2 swept-up px ejecta -px By2 nejecta ejecta nswept-up energy evolution ejecta energy swept-up energy Prad swept-up Ex energy Prad ejecta By energy x x time