Stentless vs Stented Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the Small Aortic Root Laurens W. Wollersheim, MD, Wilson W. Li, MD, Abdullah Kaya, MD, PhD, Berto J. Bouma, MD, PhD, Antoine H. Driessen, MD, Wim J. van Boven, MD, PhD, Jan van der Meulen, MD, Bas A. de Mol, MD, PhD Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 390-397 (June 2016) DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2016.02.012 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Survival. (Color version of figure is available online.) Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 28, 390-397DOI: (10.1053/j.semtcvs.2016.02.012) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Cumulative incidence function estimates of aortic valve reoperation and structural valve deterioration. SVD, structural valve deterioration. (Color version of figure is available online.) Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 28, 390-397DOI: (10.1053/j.semtcvs.2016.02.012) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Mixed effects model of echocardiographic results. MF, Mitroflow; Pmax, maximum valvular gradient; Pmean, mean valvular gradient; SOLO, Freedom SOLO. (Color version of figure is available online.) Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 28, 390-397DOI: (10.1053/j.semtcvs.2016.02.012) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Mixed effects model of echocardiographic results of the peak valvular gradient. Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 28, 390-397DOI: (10.1053/j.semtcvs.2016.02.012) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions