Link Budget Analysis Date: Authors: November 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1268r0 Submission November 2010 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Consumption Opportunity in Sub 1 GHz Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0586r0 May 2014 Igal Kotzer, General MotorsSlide 1 Automotive Considerations for the Simulation Scenarios Date: 12-May-2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0723r1 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview Date: Authors: Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.) July 2013.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
WUR Link Budget Analysis
WUR Link Budget Analysis
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
WUR PHY Performance Study with Phase Noise and ACI
WUR Link Budget Analysis Follow-up: Data Rates and SIG Bits Protection
Channel Model Considerations for P802.11af
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
Estimated delay spread of industrial plant
HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview
Considerations on down-clocking ratio
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
On the Suitability of Repetition for ah
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
60 GHz Cubicle Wall Reflectivity
PHY abstraction and performance for outdoor channel models
Data Rate for Range Requirement in 11ba
Signaling Method for Multiple Data Rate
OFDMA performance in 11ax
China MM-Wave (CMMW) Study Group - Introduction of CMMW PAR and 5C
OFDMA Performance Analysis
TGad Channel Model Update
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Outdoor Channel Model Simulation Follow-up
Data Rate for Range Requirement in 11ba
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Simulation Results for Box5
Performance Simulations
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
TGad May 2009 Closing Report
Data Rate for Range Requirement in 11ba
January, 2010 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz (Part 3)] Date: Authors: Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku University.
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Performance Gains from CCA Optimization
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
Box 5 Calibration Result
Pathloss and Channel Model Considerations for P802.11ah
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Month Year doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2016
Discussion on IMT-2020 mMTC and URLLC
Spectral line suppression for MC-OOK
Interference Analysis for Residential Environments
Simulation Scenario Floor Plans
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Spectrum Allocation for Wireless LAN and ITS in Japan
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Consideration on System Level Simulation
NGV PHY Performance Results
NGV PHY Performance Results
Presentation transcript:

Link Budget Analysis Date: 2015-11-9 Authors: November 2015 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Link Budget Analysis Date: 2015-11-9 Authors: Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Abstract In this presentation, the link budget is analysed for indoor and outdoor environments using IEEE Channel Model B and D and UMi NLOS/LOS channel models in 2.4 GHz. Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation John Doe, Some Company

20 MHz, Indoor Channel Model D [1] November 2015 20 MHz, Indoor Channel Model D [1] Channel BW: 20MHz, NF and other losses: 7 dB, Tx power: 0, 10, 20dBm MCS0: 38, 70, 135m, MCS3: 21, 41, 81m Packet length: 100 Bytes 17dB, MCS3 10% PER 9dB, MCS0 10% PER MCS3: 21m 41m 81m MCS0: 38m 70m 135m Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

2 MHz, Indoor Channel Model D [1] November 2015 2 MHz, Indoor Channel Model D [1] Channel BW: 2MHz, NF and other losses: 7 dB, Tx power: 0, 10, 20dBm MCS0: 70, 130, 270m, MCS3: 45, 80, 165m Packet length: 100 Bytes 9m (3 floors) 17dB 10% PER 45m 80m 165m 70m 130m 270m Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

2MHz, Indoor Channel Model B [1] November 2015 2MHz, Indoor Channel Model B [1] Channel BW: 2MHz, Tx power: 0, 10, 20dBm MCS0: 50, 95, 180m, MCS3: 30, 55, 100m Packet length: 100 Bytes 6m (2 floors) 21dB 10% PER 12.5dB 10% PER 50m 95m 180m 30m 55m 100m Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

2MHz, Outdoor UMi NLOS [1] November 2015 Channel BW: 2MHz, Tx power: 0, 10, 20dBm MCS0: 60, 110, 210m, MCS3: 30, 60, 110m Packet length: 100 Bytes 16.75dB 10% PER 6.75dB 10% PER 30m 60m 110m 60m 110m 210m Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

2MHz, Outdoor UMi LOS [1] November 2015 Channel BW: 2MHz, Tx power: 0, 10, 20dBm MCS0: 275, 500, 875m, MCS3: 180, 300, 550m Packet length: 100 Bytes 11.75dB 10% PER 2.75dB 10% PER 275m 500m 875m 180m 300m 550m Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

Residential Scenario [2] November 2015 Residential Scenario [2] Additional attenuation between floors and walls Tx range for MCS0, Channel Model D: Number of floors Distance (m) Attenuation (dB) 2 6 18.3 3 9 33.5 4 12 43.6 5 15 51 5th floor 4th floor Tx range 3rd floor 2nd floor 1st floor 2MHz: 0dBm 20dBm Number of walls Distance (m) Attenuation (dB) 1 20 5 2 30 10 … 9 100 45 0dBm 20dBm BW 20 MHz 2 MHz Tx power: 0dBm 2 floors/2 rooms 3 floors/3 rooms Tx power: 20 dBm 3 floors/4 rooms 4 floors/5 rooms Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

November 2015 Observation For an indoor NLOS environment, current 20 MHz operation in the 2.4 GHz band can attain 2-3 floors and 2-4 rooms coverage using a Tx power in the range of 0-20dBm for Channel Model D 2MHz operation in the 2.4 GHz band increases the coverage to 3-4 floors and 3-5 rooms For an outdoor NLOS environment, UMi NLOS results show similar coverage as indoor IEEE Channel Model D (2 MHz, MCS0, Tx power 0-20dBm) Channel Model D: 70-270 m (without floor/wall attenuation) UMi NLOS: 60-210 m For an outdoor LOS environment, UMi LOS results show coverage of 275-875m using MCS0 and 180-550m using MCS3 (2 MHz, Tx power 0-20dBm) Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

November 2015 References [1] IEEE 802.11-14/882r4, IEEE 802.11ax channel model document [2] IEEE 802.11-14/621r3, TGax simulation scenarios Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

November 2015 Backup Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

November 2015 PER - Channel Model B,D 1x1 1-stream, MCS 0-8, 100 byte packet, NLOS, all impairments, 20 MHz 12.5dB 21dB 9dB 17dB IEEE Channel Model B IEEE Channel Model D Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

November 2015 PER - ITU UMi LOS, NLOS IEEE 802.11-15/0099, “Payload Symbol Size for 11ax” For this presentation threshold is set to 1.25dB lower to use for100B PER 4dB 13dB 8dB 18dB LOS NLOS Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation