Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Advertisements

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Cytotoxicity of MSP samples to normal and cancer cell lines.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Soft robotic VAD concept.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Antitumor effect of local cancer immunotherapy treatment toward distant B16F10 tumors. Antitumor effect of local cancer immunotherapy treatment toward.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Pneumatic oscillator driven by an air source of constant pressure.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Details of the soft, bistable valve.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Antitumor effect of local cancer immunotherapy treatment in various tumor models. Antitumor effect of local cancer immunotherapy treatment in various tumor.

Experimental results for healthy participants.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Translation of a spherical object.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

The applications of the biohybrid structural color hydrogels in a heart-on-a-chip system. The applications of the biohybrid structural color hydrogels.

Fig. 1 Examples of experimental stimuli and behavioral performance.

Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Vaccine MN confer protective innate and adaptive immunity.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Results for random clusters.

The two modalities for the multitask condition.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

Deformability and stability of RBC microswimmers squeezing through confined spaces smaller than their size. Deformability and stability of RBC microswimmers.

Fig. 3 Production of protein and Fe(II) at the end of growth correlated with increasing concentrations of ferrihydrite in the media that contained 0.2.

Control of a cell-cultured microrobot in vitro and in vivo.

Discrimination accuracy across conditions.

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Fig. 3 Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from 1982 to Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from.

Fig. 4 Behavior of resistance peak near density nm = 5.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices. Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices. (A) Experimental setup with instrumented heart (photograph shows device implementation for the LV). (B and C) Plots showing average volumetric ejection and peak pressures on the LV at a range of afterloads. NS, not significant. (D to G) Plots showing the pressure, flow rate, average volumetric ejections, and peak pressures for the device as applied to the RV. Error bars denote ±SD. ***P < 0.001. Christopher J. Payne et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan6736 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works