Group Behaviour: Leadership by Those in Need

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sea turtles Current Biology
Advertisements

Niche construction drives social dependence in hermit crabs
Multisensory Integration: What You See Is Where You Hear
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages R447-R448 (June 2017)
Polyethylene bio-degradation by caterpillars?
Jean-Paul Noel, Mark Wallace, Randolph Blake  Current Biology 
Laminopathies: Too Much SUN Is a Bad Thing
Plant Growth: Jogging the Cell Cycle with JAG
Invertebrate solutions for sensing gravity
Nuclear envelope Current Biology
From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages R431-R435 (May 2010)
Shape Control: Cell Growth Hits the Mechanical Buffers
Musical Consonance: The Importance of Harmonicity
Pericycle Current Biology
Anthropology: The Long Lives of Fairy Tales
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Microbiology: Mixing Wine, Chocolate, and Coffee
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Linguistic Relativity: Does Language Help or Hinder Perception?
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (July 2012)
Cell Division: Experiments and Modelling Unite to Resolve the Middle
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Meiosis: Organizing Microtubule Organizers
Multisensory Integration: What You See Is Where You Hear
Infant cognition Current Biology
Kinesthetic information disambiguates visual motion signals
Flying insect swarms Current Biology
Restoring sight in blind cavefish
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Animal Behavior: The Truman Show for Ants
Phosphoinositide Function in Cytokinesis
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages R1025-R1026 (December 2013)
Shape Control: Cell Growth Hits the Mechanical Buffers
Visual Attention: Size Matters
The real ‘domains’ of life
Fertilization: Monogamy by Mutually Assured Destruction
Competitive Helping in Online Giving
Honeybee Communication: A Signal for Danger
The many colours of ‘the dress’
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Sea turtles Current Biology
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages R262-R263 (March 2014)
Cell Polarity: ParA-logs Gather around the Hub
Developmental Patterning: Putting the Squeeze on Mis-specified Cells
Asif A. Ghazanfar, Daniel Y. Takahashi, Neil Mathur, W. Tecumseh Fitch 
Animal Behaviour: Feeding the Superorganism
Auditory Neuroscience: How to Stop Tinnitus by Buzzing the Vagus
Pericycle Current Biology
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Meiosis: Checking Chromosomes Pair up Properly
Neural Coding: Bumps on the Move
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Visual aftereffects Current Biology
ADF/Cofilin Current Biology
Octopus Movement: Push Right, Go Left
Invertebrate solutions for sensing gravity
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Insect Navigation: How Flies Keep Track of Their Snack
The challenge of measuring long-term positive aftereffects
Planar Cell Polarity: A Bridge Too Far?
Drosophila Connectomics: Mapping the Larval Eye’s Mind
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Murmurations Current Biology
Basal bodies Current Biology
Vision: Attending the Invisible
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Endosperm Imprinting: A Child Custody Battle?
Presentation transcript:

Group Behaviour: Leadership by Those in Need David J.T. Sumpter  Current Biology  Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages R325-R327 (April 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.049 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A schematic representation of the interactions in self-propelled particle models. The fish-like objects represent particles and the vectors denote their respective directional influence on the focal particle (black). The focal particle is repulsed by the nearby red particle, aligns with the green particle and is attracted to the distant blue particle. Exactly how repulsion, alignment and attraction depend on the distance to neighbours varies from model to model, but typically very nearby particles have a repulsive force and further away particles are attractive and aligned to. Current Biology 2009 19, R325-R327DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.049) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Typical example of the two types of evolutionarily stable flock types in the Wood and Ackland [15] model. Each flock is shown before and during the attack of a predator. (A) is a compact milling torus that responds relatively slowly to the predator while (B) is a dynamic parallel group with a high degree of alignment but only loose between individual attraction. When a predator attacks, the group fans out to avoid it. Prey heads are marked with a circle and the line indicates their current velocity. Predators are larger and marked with an arrow. (Reproduced with permisssion from [15].) Current Biology 2009 19, R325-R327DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.049) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions