Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages e4 (July 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Isabella Maiellaro, Martin J. Lohse, Robert J. Kittel, Davide Calebiro 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
90K Glycoprotein Promotes Degradation of Mutant β-Catenin Lacking the ISGylation or Phosphorylation Sites in the N-terminus  So-Yeon Park, Somy Yoon,
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Stem Cell Regulation by Arabidopsis WOX Genes
Defining Resistance and Tolerance to Cancer
Supplementary Figure 1 A. B..
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages e5 (March 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages e6 (June 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
CoREST Represses the Heat Shock Response Mediated by HSF1
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Euiseok J. Kim, Matthew W. Jacobs, Tony Ito-Cole, Edward M. Callaway 
Structural Basis for Regulation of ESCRT-III Complexes by Lgd
Prion-like Domains Program Ewing’s Sarcoma
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Combinatorial Microenvironments Impose a Continuum of Cellular Responses to a Single Pathway-Targeted Anti-cancer Compound  Chun-Han Lin, Tiina Jokela,
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Structural and Functional Studies of the 252 kDa Nucleoporin ELYS Reveal Distinct Roles for Its Three Tethered Domains  Silvija Bilokapic, Thomas U. Schwartz 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Markus Zettl, Michael Way  Current Biology 
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages e5 (March 2017)
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
RNA Controls PolyQ Protein Phase Transitions
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Mario R. Pagani, Kimihiko Oishi, Bruce D. Gelb, Yi Zhong  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (March 2015)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Maintenance of Miranda Localization in Drosophila Neuroblasts Involves Interaction with the Cognate mRNA  Anne Ramat, Matthew Hannaford, Jens Januschke 
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Pallavi Lamba, Diana Bilodeau-Wentworth, Patrick Emery, Yong Zhang 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Aeri Cho, Masato Kato, Tess Whitwam, Ji Hoon Kim, Denise J. Montell 
PAR-1 Kinase Plays an Initiator Role in a Temporally Ordered Phosphorylation Process that Confers Tau Toxicity in Drosophila  Isao Nishimura, Yufeng Yang,
Three-Step Model for Polarized Sorting of KIF17 into Dendrites
Targeting Plant Ethylene Responses by Controlling Essential Protein–Protein Interactions in the Ethylene Pathway  Melanie M.A. Bisson, Georg Groth  Molecular.
Irina Chernyakov, Felipe Santiago-Tirado, Anthony Bretscher 
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Rapid Disruption of Dishevelled Activity Uncovers an Intercellular Role in Maintenance of Prickle in Core Planar Polarity Protein Complexes  Margarida.
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e3 (March 2019)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
MRT, Functioning with NURF Complex, Regulates Lipid Droplet Size
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 529-537.e4 (July 2018) Molecular Dissection of FUS Points at Synergistic Effect of Low-Complexity Domains in Toxicity  Elke Bogaert, Steven Boeynaems, Masato Kato, Lin Guo, Thomas R. Caulfield, Jolien Steyaert, Wendy Scheveneels, Nathalie Wilmans, Wanda Haeck, Nicole Hersmus, Joost Schymkowitz, Frederic Rousseau, James Shorter, Patrick Callaerts, Wim Robberecht, Philip Van Damme, Ludo Van Den Bosch  Cell Reports  Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 529-537.e4 (July 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.070 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 24, 529-537.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.070) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 FUS Expression Induces Neurodegeneration and Motor Defects in Both Developmental and Adult Stages (A and B) Motor neuron expression using the D42 gal4 driver of WT and mutant FUS induces eclosion defects (A) and immature phenotypes (B) in Drosophila. Pictures give an example of a fly unable to eclose from the pupal case, and an escaper illustrating the immature phenotype. (C) Ubiquitous, pan-neuronal and motor neuron-specific adult-onset expression of WT and mutant FUS reduces fly survival. (D) Adult-onset FUS expression in the motor neurons induces neurodegeneration and affects flight ability. Extent of motor dysfunction is correlated to loss of neurons. Survival graphs: log-rank Mantel-Cox; all other graphs: Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s multiple comparison. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2018 24, 529-537.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.070) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Molecular Dissection of FUS Toxicity (A) Scheme illustrating different domain deletions tested. (B) Deletion RGG2 and NLS domains rescues FUS toxicity on both eclosion rates and the appearance of the immature phenotype, whereas deletion of QGSY only rescues eclosion rates. Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s multiple comparison. ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2018 24, 529-537.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.070) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 N- and C-Terminal LCDs Are Sufficient to Replicate Full-Length Toxicity (A) Comparison between caz and FUS. Both proteins share a similar domain architecture, protein disorder, and amino acid composition, but caz lacks the QGSY domain. Amino acid composition was calculated for each domain. (B) Humanizing caz shows that addition of the FUS QGSY domain to the benign caz NLS mutant makes the chimeric protein toxic again. (C) Drosophilizing FUS shows that deleting QGSY generates a protein with similar properties to the benign caz NLS mutant. (D and E) Schematic representation of the constructs containing different regions of FUS that were used to create transgenic flies (D) and the effect on toxicity (E). Only when fused together do the N- and C-terminal LCDs cause toxicity. For (B)–(E), Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s multiple comparison. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2018 24, 529-537.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.070) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 RGG Domains Are Required for Efficient Binding of the FUS C-Terminal Domain to Phase-Separated QGSY Hydrogels and Liquid Droplets (A) Scheme illustrating the C-terminal deletion constructs tested for QGSY droplet and hydrogel binding. (B) The RGG domains are the main domains affecting binding of GFP fusion constructs to mCherry-QGSY hydrogels or QGSY droplets. Asterisk indicates higher exposure setting to show that there is still some residual binding of single ΔRGG mutants to the hydrogel. (C) Partitioning of the C-terminal deletion constructs in the QGSY droplets and hydrogels in vitro correlates with the toxicity of the corresponding full-length deletion construct in fly. The red fit takes into account all values; the blue fit considers ΔRGG1 as an outlier. Cell Reports 2018 24, 529-537.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.070) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Arginines in the RGG2 Domain Are Involved in the SG Targeting and Maturation of FUS (A) Comparison between charge plots of QGSY and RGG2 domains. Mutated arginines of RGG2 are highlighted in green. (B) RGG2 mutant full-length FUS shows reduced liquid droplet formation. Note that droplets over time fuse and wet the glass surface. (C) Quantification of FUS phase separation; SEM. (D) Deletion of RGG2 or mutating RGG2 arginines have a similar effect on the SG enrichment of FUS. Whiskers indicate 95% confidence interval; Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s multiple comparison. (E) Examples of arsenite-induced and spontaneous SGs positive for FUS and the general SG marker G3BP1. (F and G) Mutation of RGG2 arginines decreases the immobile fraction (1-plateau) and half-life of FUS in SGs induced by arsenite treatment (F), as well as SGs induced by FUS overexpression (G). FRAP graphs: two-way ANOVA; plateau and half-life comparisons: unpaired t test. Error bars, mean ± SEM. (H) Mutating RGG2 arginines partially rescues FUS toxicity in fly. Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s multiple comparison. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2018 24, 529-537.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.070) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions