S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher F. Liu et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Advertisements

Oana Dickinson et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Takekuni Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:27-35
Takekuni Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:27-35
Waddah Maskoun et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Konstantinos C. Siontis et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Pablo Ávila et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Chin-Yu Lin et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Shadi Al Halabi et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Ashish Shukla et al. JACEP 2015;1:41-51
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. JACEP 2015;1:
S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:
David S. Frankel et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Jong Sung Park et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Jacob S. Koruth et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Alexander Sedaghat et al. JACEP 2017;3:71-75
Jose C. Pachon M. et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Santiago Rivera et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Adam B. Greenbaum et al. JACEP 2015;1:
David F. Katz et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Pablo Ávila et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Wesley T. O’Neal et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Philippe Maury et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Ammar M. Killu et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Jong Sung Park et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Imran Niazi et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Mitsunori Maruyama et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Jong Sung Park et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Mohit K. Turagam et al. JACEP 2017;3:
M. Rizwan Afzal et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Leonard M. Rademakers et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Konstantinos C. Siontis et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Rachel Bastiaenen et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Francesco Santoro et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Matthew Oster et al. JACC 2019;73:
S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Prabhat Kumar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Yoshitaka Kimura et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Marwan Badri et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Mitsunori Maruyama et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Moussa Mansour et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Stuart A. Ostby et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Alexander Sedaghat et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Ayman A. Hussein et al. JACEP 2017;3:1-9
Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Noboru Ichihara et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Matthew M. Zipse et al. JACEP 2015;1:94-102
Hussam Ali et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Miyako Igarashi et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Emilce Trucco et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep
Tasneem Z. Naqvi JIMG 2010;3: Evaluation of Surface QRS to Determine Biv Pacing Surface QRS on the ultrasound monitor from lead III in response.
Valeria Calvi et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Valeria Calvi et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Leonard M. Rademakers et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Anneline S.J.M. te Riele et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Daniele Muser et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Henry Chubb et al. JACEP 2017;3:89-103
Presentation transcript:

S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:582-591 Increment in BP With Different Pacing Morphologies Change in blood pressure (BP) with biventricular pacing, His pacing, and right ventricular (RV) apical pacing are demonstrated for individual patients (gray dots) and the mean for the group (black dots). A value of 0 indicates no difference between the pacing configuration and intrinsic conduction. A value <0 favors intrinsic conduction, a value >0 favors pacing. Mean increments in BP with each pacing configuration with 95% confidence intervals are marked. AV = atrioventricular. S.M. Afzal Sohaib et al. JACEP 2015;1:582-591 American College of Cardiology Foundation