SS10 Immigration Project: Oral History
Documenting History… History History is written by the victors (Winston Churchill) History
Weighing the medium of history/histories.. Credibility Depth Engagement Type of information/experience transmitted Durability Spread ??
Oral history/histories… as a methodology Character of Oral History Methodological Complexities Potential Contribution to Academic Disciplines
Oral history/histories… as a methodology Character of Oral History Recollection…. From memory Personal interpretation of the event/history Primary source…from the rawness of personal events Made by people who are interviewed Passed down through generations- can change over time as more people have input/interpret the stories “Different perception of popular memory allowing communities to form their own self-conscious identity through recollection” Use it to “capture, compare, and critique” the official versions, other versions
Oral history/histories… as a methodology 2. Methodological Complexities Bad memories…accuracy Influence/pressure on how to remember an event People change… view on an event can change Omission Avoidance Can be influenced by the interviewer
Oral history/histories… as a methodology 3. Potential Contribution to other Disciplines Gives a lot of information- not just about the topic, but also about popular culture at the time, that person’s job/role…background information Potential for a lot more detail– of the first hand accounts of what it was like to be there…and history we don’t already know. Different points of view/opinions…gather them together to compare and contrast them. Analyse the situation from a different point of view/perspective Language- how people speak, accents, colloquialism, humour
Oral history/histories… as a methodology Interviewer must listen “in stereo” . Interviewer takes an active role. Be aware of partial recollection, emotional bias or role specific censorship… this requires us to supplement and contextualize the interviews with further research, further interviews, and critical interpretation. Transcript should not be an “edited interpretation of the interview but an accurate replicate of the spoken word, incorporating each pause, crutch word and use of vernacular language” Know that we are part of a “reconstruc[tion of] a history of knowledge sensitive to the personal as well as the public”.