Kyle C. Smith, John C. Neu, Wanda Krassowska  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (October 2007)
Klas H. Pettersen, Gaute T. Einevoll  Biophysical Journal 
Alexander I. Sobolevsky  Biophysical Journal 
Spontaneous Synchronization of Coupled Circadian Oscillators
Unsteady Motion, Finite Reynolds Numbers, and Wall Effect on Vorticella convallaria Contribute Contraction Force Greater than the Stokes Drag  Sangjin.
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
FPL Modification of CaV1
John P. Hale, C. Peter Winlove, Peter G. Petrov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Morphology of the Lamellipodium and Organization of Actin Filaments at the Leading Edge of Crawling Cells  Erdinç Atilgan, Denis Wirtz, Sean X. Sun  Biophysical.
Physical Properties of Escherichia coli Spheroplast Membranes
The Transfer Functions of Cardiac Tissue during Stochastic Pacing
A Theoretical Model of Slow Wave Regulation Using Voltage-Dependent Synthesis of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate  Mohammad S. Imtiaz, David W. Smith, Dirk.
Model Studies of the Dynamics of Bacterial Flagellar Motors
Brownian Dynamics Simulation of DNA Condensation
Mechanically Probing the Folding Pathway of Single RNA Molecules
Zhuren Wang, J. Christian Hesketh, David Fedida  Biophysical Journal 
Intracellular Ca Alternans: Coordinated Regulation by Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Release, Uptake, and Leak  Lai-Hua Xie, Daisuke Sato, Alan Garfinkel, Zhilin.
Krzysztof R. Grzęda, Justus M.B. Anumonwo, Ryan O'Connell, José Jalife 
Pulsatile Lipid Vesicles under Osmotic Stress
J. Leng, S.U. Egelhaaf, M.E. Cates  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Ben Corry, Serdar Kuyucak, Shin-Ho Chung  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Mesoscale Simulation of Blood Flow in Small Vessels
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. II
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Wolfgang Nonner, Duan P. Chen, Bob Eisenberg  Biophysical Journal 
Colocalization of Multiple DNA Loci: A Physical Mechanism
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Modeling Diverse Range of Potassium Channels with Brownian Dynamics
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Real-Time Nanopore-Based Recognition of Protein Translocation Success
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Modeling Ca2+ Feedback on a Single Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor and Its Modulation by Ca2+ Buffers  Jianwei Shuai, John E. Pearson, Ian Parker 
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. I
The “Mirror” Estimate: An Intuitive Predictor of Membrane Polarization during Extracellular Stimulation  Sébastien Joucla, Blaise Yvert  Biophysical Journal 
Alexander Peyser, Dirk Gillespie, Roland Roth, Wolfgang Nonner 
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Molecular Dynamics Study of the KcsA Potassium Channel
Jens H. Kroeger, Dan Vernon, Martin Grant  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Alexandra Witthoft, Jessica A. Filosa, George Em Karniadakis 
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Dirk Gillespie, Le Xu, Gerhard Meissner  Biophysical Journal 
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Andrew E. Blanchard, Chen Liao, Ting Lu  Biophysical Journal 
Electromechanics and Volume Dynamics in Nonexcitable Tissue Cells
Effects of Receptor Interaction in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Jeffrey R. Groff, Gregory D. Smith  Biophysical Journal 
Long-Range Nonanomalous Diffusion of Quantum Dot-Labeled Aquaporin-1 Water Channels in the Cell Plasma Membrane  Jonathan M. Crane, A.S. Verkman  Biophysical.
Evaluating Intramural Virtual Electrodes in the Myocardial Wedge Preparation: Simulations of Experimental Conditions  G. Plank, A. Prassl, E. Hofer, N.A.
Computed Pore Potentials of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Yariv Kafri, David K. Lubensky, David R. Nelson  Biophysical Journal 
R.P. Schuhmeier, B. Dietze, D. Ursu, F. Lehmann-Horn, W. Melzer 
Use Dependence of Heat Sensitivity of Vanilloid Receptor TRPV2
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Montse Rovira-Bru, David H. Thompson, Igal Szleifer 
S. Rüdiger, Ch. Nagaiah, G. Warnecke, J.W. Shuai  Biophysical Journal 
Siu Cheung Li, Matthew Hoyles, Serdar Kuyucak, Shin-Ho Chung 
Mechanism of Electroporative Dye Uptake by Mouse B Cells
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Bistability of Cell Adhesion in Shear Flow
Presentation transcript:

Model of Creation and Evolution of Stable Electropores for DNA Delivery  Kyle C. Smith, John C. Neu, Wanda Krassowska  Biophysical Journal  Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages 2813-2826 (May 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9 Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Energy of hydrophobic (r<r*) and hydrophilic (r>r*) pores as a function of pore radius at the transmembrane potential Vm=0 (solid lines). The radii r* and rd indicate positions of energy barriers for creation of hydrophilic pores and for pore expansion, respectively, and rm is the position of a local energy minimum. E*, Em, and Ed denote energy values for pores of radii r*, rm, and rd, respectively. Dashed lines show pore energy for V=0.5V, illustrating that for sufficiently large Vm, local minimum and maximum disappear and any pore with the radius above r* will grow. (Inset) Close-up of energy for small pores. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Electrical force F(r, Vm) acting on a pore, given by Eq. 6, with Vm=1V. (Inset) Assumed geometry of a hydrophilic pore. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Circuit representation of a uniformly polarized membrane considered in this study. Capacitor C represents the total capacitance of the membrane and the constant resistor R accounts for the flow of current through channel proteins. The variable resistor accounts for the dynamically changing current through pores, Ip. Resistor Rs represents the series resistance of the experimental setup and V0 is the external stimulus. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Creation and evolution of pores. A 10ms pulse was applied at three strengths: 1.15V (dashed line), 1.25V (solid line), and 1.35V (dash-dotted line). The left side of each panel shows the initial transient (0–20μs) and the right side shows the long time evolution (20μs–10ms). (A) Transmembrane potential Vm. Note that the final value of Vm does not depend monotonically on the pulse strength. (B) The number of large pores K. K levels off for the 1.35V pulse, indicating that the creation of pores effectively stopped. For 1.15 and 1.25V pulses, K appears to level off on the microsecond timescale; on the millisecond scale, it continues to slowly increase during the remainder of the pulse at a rate that decreases monotonically with decreasing Vm. (C) Maximum radius rmax and mean radius r¯. The difference between rmax and r¯ illustrates the distribution of pores: initially, pore radii are spread out, then all pores assume the same size. For the 1.35V pulse, only one line is visible because rmax and r¯ nearly overlap. Note the decrease of final radius with the pulse strength. (D) Fractional pore area, FPA. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The pore radii during the 10μs pulse and the postshock evolution of pores. The gray scale represents the pore radii distribution (i.e., the number of pores with radii between r and r+dr). Solid lines show the 10, 20, … , 100th percentiles of the maximum pore radius, illustrating the evolution of the pore radii in time. (A) Evolution of pores after a 1.25V pulse, which created 18,025 pores. After the pulse, all pores shrink to rm (the minimum-energy radius of Fig. 1). (B) Evolution of pores after a 1.15V pulse, which created a smaller number of pores, 2772. After the pulse, all pores shrink to rm except the largest pore, which grows to a stable radius of 2.23μm. (Inset) The pulse and the first 300μs after the pulse shown on an expanded vertical scale. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The dependence of DNA uptake on pulse magnitude and duration. Solid lines show intracellular DNA concentration normalized by the DNA concentration required for transformation. The dashed line is the boundary between postshock coarsening (below) and shrinkage (above). An effective pulse for DNA delivery should have a magnitude and duration within the region enclosed by heavy solid lines and above the dashed line (coarsening/shrinkage boundary). Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Pore evolution during the two-pulse protocol. A 10μs first pulse was followed by a 100μs break and then a 10ms, 0.5V second pulse. The gray scale and solid lines are as in Fig. 5. In each subpanel, time is measured from the beginning of the pulse or the break, respectively. (A) A 1.25V first pulse; only the first 30μs of the break and the first 70μs of the second pulse are shown. During the break, all pores shrink to rm. During the second pulse, all pores expand to 18.2nm. (B) A 1.15V first pulse; only the first 6ms of the break and the first 1ms of the second pulse are shown. During the break, all pores shrink to rm except the largest pore, which reaches a stable radius of 2.23μm. During the second pulse, all pores expand to 45.8nm. (Inset) The first pulse and the beginning of the break shown on an expanded vertical scale. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 DNA uptake during the two-pulse protocol. A 10μs, 1.25V first pulse is followed by a break and then a 0.5V second pulse. (A) Uptake as a function of the second pulse duration. The preceding break was 100μs. (Note that the corresponding Fig. 5 in Sukharev et al. (1992) reported electric charge as a measure of pulse duration, because their pulse was not rectangular.) (B) Uptake as a function of break duration. The second pulse duration was 10ms. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 2813-2826DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74334-9) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions