Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
ASF1a Promotes Non-homologous End Joining Repair by Facilitating Phosphorylation of MDC1 by ATM at Double-Strand Breaks  Kyung Yong Lee, Jun-Sub Im, Etsuko.
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
SMARCAD1 Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Are Required for Resection during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Sharmistha Chakraborty, Raj K. Pandita,
RNF168 Promotes Noncanonical K27 Ubiquitination to Signal DNA Damage
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
DNA Degradation at Unprotected Telomeres in Yeast Is Regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) Cell-Cycle Kinase  Momchil D. Vodenicharov, Raymund J. Wellinger 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Feng Zhang, Jiazhong Shi, Chunjing Bian, Xiaochun Yu  Cell Reports 
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
A Role for Gcn5 in Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Activation of DSB Processing Requires Phosphorylation of CtIP by ATR
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
New Histone Incorporation Marks Sites of UV Repair in Human Cells
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e7 (March 2017)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 18, Pages (September 2014)
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (October 2009)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e6 (October 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 723-733 (December 2012) Histone H2A.Z Controls a Critical Chromatin Remodeling Step Required for DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Ye Xu, Marina K. Ayrapetov, Chang Xu, Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu, Yiduo Hu, Brendan D. Price  Molecular Cell  Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 723-733 (December 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 H2A.Z Is Exchanged onto Nucleosomes at DSBs (A) 293T cells or 293T cells expressing vector or HA-H2A.Z were transfected with p84-ZFN. Cells were processed for ChIP 18 hr later using either IgG, ChIP grade H2A.Z antibody, or HA antibody (for HA-H2A.Z). Real-time qPCR utilized primers located 1.5 kb to the right of the DSB. ChIP signals were calculated as percent IP DNA/Input DNA. Results ± SD (n = 3). (B) 293T cells were transfected with p84-ZFN (●,○) or vector (Δ). Cells were processed for ChIP using antibodies to γH2AX (○) or H2A.Z (●), followed by real-time qPCR with primers located 1.5 kb to the right of the DSB. ChIP signals were calculated as IP DNA/Input DNA and expressed as fold enrichment relative to the uncut (minus p84-ZFN; Δ) sample. Results ± SD (n = 3). (C) 293T cells were transiently transfected with vector (Δ) or the p84-ZFN (●,○). Eighteen hours posttransfection, cells were processed for ChIP using antibodies to γH2AX (○) or H2A.Z (●), followed by real-time qPCR using the indicated primer pairs. The relative ChIP signal from the uncut, vector-transfected cells is shown (Δ). Results ± SD (n = 3). (D) 293T cells were transfected with vector (Δ) or K230-ZFN (○,●), which creates a unique DSB at position 46.16 Mb on chromosome 3. Eighteen hours posttransfection, cells were processed for ChIP using antibodies to γH2AX (○) or H2A.Z (●), followed by real-time qPCR using the indicated primer pairs. The ChIP signal from the uncut, vector-transfected cells is shown (Δ). Results ± SD (n = 3). See also Figures S1 and S2. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 723-733DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 H2A.Z Exchange Mediates Decreased Nucleosome Stability at DSBs (A) 293T cells expressing p400 or catalytically inactive p400ATPase, Tip60, or catalytically inactive Tip60HD were transfected with vector (Vec) or p84-ZFN (ZFN). Eighteen hours posttransfection, cells were processed for ChIP using H2A.Z antibody, followed by real-time qPCR using primer pairs located 1.5 kb to the right of the DSB. Results ± SD (n = 3). (B) 293T cells expressing a nonspecific shRNA (shControl), shRNA targeting H2A.Z (shH2A.Z), or shH2A.Z expressing cells rescued by expression of an shRNA-resistant HA-H2A.Z (HA-H2A.ZR) were incubated with bleomycin (5 μM) for the indicated times (min). Cell pellets were extracted in 1.0 M NaCl, and released histones were detected by western blot analysis for γH2AX, H2AX, and H3. Ponceau S staining was used to demonstrate equal loading. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 723-733DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 H2A.Z Exchange Is Required for Acetylation and Ubiquitination of the Chromatin (A) 293T cells expressing a nonspecific shRNA (shCon), shRNA to H2A.Z (shH2A.Z), or expressing p400, p400ATPase, Tip60, or Tip60HD were transfected with vector (Vec) or p84-ZFN (ZFN). Eighteen hours posttransfection, cells were processed for ChIP using antibody to acetylated histone H4 (H4Ac), followed by real-time qPCR using primers located 1.5 kb to the right of the DSB. Results ± SD (n = 3). (B) 293T cells expressing a nonspecific shRNA (shCon) or shRNA targeting H2A.Z (shH2A.Z) were irradiated (2Gy). Ubiquitin (detected with FK2 antibody) and brca1 foci were detected by immunofluorescent staining. Cells with > 5 foci were counted as positive (results ± SD; n = ∼100). p values were calculated using a t test. (C) Selected images from (B). See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 723-733DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Histone H2A.Z Is an Essential Component of the DDR (A) 293T cells expressing a nonspecific shRNA (○) or shRNA targeting H2A.Z (●) were irradiated, and clonogenic cell survival was measured. Results ± SD (n = 4). (B) 293T cells expressing a nontargeting shRNA (shCon) or shRNA targeting H2A.Z (shH2A.Z) were irradiated. Twenty-five hours later, cells were treated with colcemid, and the number of chromosome aberrations per cell was counted. p value was calculated using a t test. (C) Cells with the stably integrated GFP-HR reporter system expressing a nonspecific shRNA (shCon) or shRNA targeting H2A.Z (shH2A.Z) were transfected with the I-Sce1 nuclease to introduce DSBs, and GFP-positive cells were monitored by FACS. Results ± SD (n = 3). p values were calculated using a t test. (D) Cells stably expressing an NHEJ-GFP reporter system were transfected with a nonspecific vector (shCon) or shRNA targeting H2A.Z (shH2A.Z). Cells were transfected with the I-Sce1 nuclease, and GFP-positive cells were measured. Results are expressed as ± SD (n = 3). p values were calculated using a t test. See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 723-733DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 H2A.Z Is Required to Retain the Ku70/Ku80 Complex at DSBs (A) Upper panel shows U2OS cells expressing shCon or shH2AZ that were irradiated (2 Gy/60 min), fixed, and RPA32 detected by immunofluorescent staining. Lower panel presents U2OS cells expressing shCon or shH2AZ that were prelabeled with BrdU then treated with camptothecin (CPT: 1 μM) for 60 min. Cells were fixed under nondenaturing conditions and BrdU in ssDNA detected with antiBrdU antibody. (B) Quantitation of (A). Cells with more than five foci were counted as positive, with an average of 100 cells counted per experiment. p values were calculated using a t test. (C) Laser striping was used to create DNA damage in U2OS cells expressing shCon or shH2AZ. Cells were pre-extracted (see Experimental Procedures) immediately after completion of laser striping (0 min) or allowed to recover for 15 or 30 min. γH2AX and Ku70/Ku80 were detected by immunofluorescent staining. See also Figures S6 and S7. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 723-733DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 H2A.Z Regulates Loading of Ku70/Ku80 and RPA at DSBs 293T cells expressing shCon or shH2A.Z were transfected with p84-ZFN. Eighteen hours posttransfection, cells were processed for ChIP using antibodies to (A) Ku70/Ku80 or (B) RPA32. Real-time qPCR was carried out using primer pairs indicated. Broken line indicates ChIP signal from control (uncut) cells. Results ± SD (n = 3). Molecular Cell 2012 48, 723-733DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Loss of CtIP Restores Ku70/Ku80 Binding and NHEJ in H2A.Z-Depleted Cells (A) Laser striping was used to create DNA damage in U2OS cells expressing a nonspecific shRNA (shCon) or shRNA targeting either H2A.Z, CtIP or both. Cells were stained for γH2AX and Ku70 15 min after laser striping. (B) 293T cells were transfected with nonspecific shRNA (shCon) or shRNA targeting either H2A.Z or CtIP. 293T cells expressing an shRNA-resistant HA-H2A.Z protein (HA-H2A.ZR) were also used. Cells were subsequently transfected with vector (Vec) or p84-ZFN (ZFN), and ChIP analysis was carried out using antibody to Ku70/Ku80 and primers located 500 bp to the right of the DSB. Results ± SD (n = 3). (C) Cells stably expressing the NHEJ-GFP reporter system and either a nonspecific shRNA (shCon) or shRNA targeting H2A.Z, CtIP or both were transfected with the I-Sce1 endonuclease (+). The percentage of GFP-positive cells is shown. Results are expressed as ± SD (n = 3). (D) Cells with the integrated altNHEJ-GFP reporter system were transfected with a nonspecific shRNA (shCon) or shRNA targeting H2A.Z, CtIP, or both. Following transfection of I-Sce1 endonuclease (+), the percentage of GFP-positive cells was measured. Results are expressed as ± SD (n = 3). (E) Model for function of H2A.Z in DSB repair. Yellow indicates H2A nucleosomes; orange represents H2A.Z nucleosomes. Ku, Ku70/Ku80; Ac, acetylation; Ub, ubiquitination. See also Figure S7. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 723-733DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.026) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions