Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Advertisements

Mus81-Eme1 Are Essential Components of a Holliday Junction Resolvase
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Haley D.M. Wyatt, Shriparna Sarbajna, Joao Matos, Stephen C. West 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (September 1996)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Rosemary C Dietrich, Robert Incorvaia, Richard A Padgett 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Volume 125, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
ResT, a Telomere Resolvase Encoded by the Lyme Disease Spirochete
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage Activated by XPG Protein
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Mechanism of 5′-Directed Excision in Human Mismatch Repair
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Generalized RNA-Directed Recombination of RNA
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Simone E. Nunes-Düby, Marco A. Azaro, Arthur Landy  Current Biology 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages (August 2000)
Site-Specific Ribonuclease Activity of Eukaryotic DNA Topoisomerase I
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Dicer-like Enzymes with Sequence Cleavage Preferences
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Increased Recombination Intermediates and Homologous Integration Hot Spots at DNA Replication Origins  Mónica Segurado, Marı́a Gómez, Francisco Antequera 
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

The Endogenous Mus81-Eme1 Complex Resolves Holliday Junctions by a Nick and Counternick Mechanism  Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell  Molecular Cell  Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 747-759 (September 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3

Figure 1 Substrate Specificity of Endogenous TEV-Mus81 Complex (A) Schematic representation of the various DNA substrates derived from a set of 4 oligonucleotides that associate to form the fixed X0 structure. Oligonucleotides 2a and 2b are the two halves of oligonucleotide 2 that associate with part of oligonucleotides 1 or 3, respectively. Similarly, oligonucleotides 3a and 3b are the two halves of oligonucleotide 3 that associate with oligonucleotides 2 or 4, respectively. (B) Substrates were incubated for 30 min at 30°C with 3 μl of TEV-elution buffer (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11) or 3 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from a Mus81:TAP strain (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). Substrates nX01, RF, 3′FL, and 5′FL contained a 5′-labeled oligonucleotide 1. Substrates nX02 and nX04 contained 5′-labeled oligonucleotides 2 and 4, respectively. Reactions were analyzed on a 12% denaturing gel. The total amount of cleavage products was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis and expressed as a percentage of total radiolabel. (C) Part of the reactions carried out with nX01, nX02, and nX04 were analyzed on a 10% neutral gel. Linear duplex products were quantified and expressed as a percentage of total radiolabel. (D) Intact X01 HJ and the corresponding nX01 substrate were incubated at 30°C with 3 μl of TEV-eluate for 5, 15, or 90 min. Products were separated by neutral PAGE (data not shown) and linear duplex products were quantified and expressed as a percentage of total radiolabel. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 747-759DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3)

Figure 2 A Nicked HJ Is a Preferred Substrate Compared to 3′FL and RF Structures (A) The nX01, 3′FL, and RF substrates were incubated for 40 min with increasing amounts of TEV-Mus81 eluate as indicated. All substrates contained a 5′-labeled oligonucleotide 1. Reactions products were analyzed on a denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel. A Maxam-Gilbert T+C sequencing ladder derived from oligonucleotide 1 was included (lane *). The total amount of cleavage products was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis and expressed as a percentage of total radiolabel. (B) The cleavage sites that yield products W, X, Y, and Z are indicated by arrows on each DNA structure. The nick site on strand 3 in nX0 is circled by the dotted line. (C) The nX01 and 3′FL substrates containing a 5′-labeled oligonucleotide 1 were incubated with 3 μl of TEV-eluate for increasing times as indicated. Reactions were analyzed on a denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel. The total amount of cleavage products was quantified and expressed as a percentage of total radiolabel. (D) The amount of cleavage products W, X, Y, and Z were quantified at each time point by PhosphorImager analysis. (E) The nX01 substrate was incubated for 60 min with 2 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from a Mus81:TAP strain (lane 1) or 6 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from mus81::DD:TAP or mus81:TAP eme1 mutant strains. (F) A linear double-strand DNA substrate with a single-strand nick in its center was incubated with 2 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from a Mus81:TAP strain (lane 1) or 6 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from mus81::DD:TAP or mus81:TAP eme1 mutant strains. The oligonucleotide 5′ to the nick was labeled at its 5′ end as indicated by the black dot. Reaction products were analyzed on a denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel. A schematic below the gel indicates the major cleavage site. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 747-759DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3)

Figure 3 Action of TEV-Mus81 on Four-Way Branched Structures that Contain Both Duplex-Duplex and Duplex-Flap Junctions (A) Schematic representation of the structure of the various DNA substrates. The black dot indicates the position of the 5′ radiolabel. (B) Each substrate was incubated for 30 min at 30°C with 3 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from a Mus81:TAP strain. Reaction products were analyzed on a denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 747-759DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3)

Figure 4 Recombinant ERCC1-XPF Does Not Resolve HJs or Nicked HJs (A) nX01, 3′FL, RF, and SL substrates were incubated for 30 min with either 150 ng of rERCC1-XPF (lane 2) or 3 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from a Mus81:TAP strain (lane 3). Reaction products were analyzed on a denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel. Note: The stem loop substrate (SL) consisted of a 12 bp stem and a 22 nucleotide poly-T single-strand loop made with a self-annealing 5′-labeled 46-mer oligonucleotide. (B) Parts of the reactions carried out with the nX01 substrate were analyzed on a neutral 10% polyacrylamide gel. (C) A mobile X12 junction was incubated for 30 min with either 150 ng of rERCC1-XPF (lane 2) or 3 μl of TEV-eluate obtained from a Mus81-TAP strain (lane 3). The substrate contained a 5′-labeled oligo X1. Reaction products were analyzed on a neutral 10% polyacrylamide gel. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 747-759DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3)

Figure 5 Mus81-Eme1 Resolves HJs by a Nick and Counternick Mechanism (A) The X12-1 mobile junction containing 5′-labeled oligonucleotide 1 was incubated for 30 min with TEV-Mus81 eluate. Bands X, Y, and Z were excised, and the DNA was extracted for further analysis on a denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel. (B) DNA samples excised from bands X, Y, and Z shown in (A) were loaded on a denaturing 10% polyacrylamide gel (lanes 4, 5, and 6). Control reactions identical to those analyzed in (A) were directly loaded on the denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel (lanes 2 and 3). A Maxam-Gilbert T+C sequencing ladder derived from oligonucleotide X1 was run in parallel (lane 1). (C) The X12-1 substrate was incubated for increasing amounts of time, as indicated, with TEV-Mus81 eluate. One-half of each reaction was analyzed on a denaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel. A Maxam-Gilbert A+G sequencing ladder derived from oligonucleotide X1 was run in parallel (lane *). (D) The remaining half of each reaction analyzed in (C) was analyzed on a neutral 10% polyacrylamide gel. (E) The total amount of cleavage products observed in (C) (oligo 1) and (D) (Linear duplex) was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis and expressed as a percentage of total radiolabel. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 747-759DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3)

Figure 6 Recombinant Mus81-Eme1 Preferentially Cleaves Nicked HJs Compared to 3′FL and RF Structures (A) Recombinant Mus81-Eme1 complex was produced in E. coli and purified as described in the Experimental Procedures. Proteins were separated on a 4%–20% SDS-PAGE gel and silver stained. Size markers are on the left. (B) The X01, nX01, 3′FL, and RF substrates were incubated at 30°C with 40 ng of rMus81-Eme1 for the indicated times. Reaction products were separated by neutral PAGE, quantified by PhosphorImager analysis, and expressed as a percentage of total radiolabel. (C) The X12-1 and nX12-1 substrates were incubated at 30°C with 8 μl of TEV-eluate or 40 ng of rMus81-Eme1 for the indicated times. Reaction products were analyzed as in (B). Note: The specific activity per volume unit of the TEV-eluate is lower than that used in Figure 5. Triangles, nX12-1; circles, X12-1; open, TEV-Mus81; filled, rMus81-Eme1. (D) The nX12-1 substrate was incubated at 30°C with 4 μl of TEV-eluate (open) or 20 ng of rMus81-Eme1 (filled) for 30 s, 1 min, and 2 min. Reaction products were separated by neutral PAGE (data not shown) and quantified as in (B) and (C). Molecular Cell 2003 12, 747-759DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3)

Figure 7 Holliday Junctions Accumulate in mus81, pol1-1, and mus81 pol1-1 Mutants (A) Map of the rDNA as reported by Sanchez et al. (1998) with minor modifications. The ars3001 region indicates the replication origin, and the P box indicates a replication pause site. The HindIII, KpnI, StuI, and BamHI restriction sites are indicated as H, K, S, and B, respectively. (B) Diagram of the migration pattern of replication intermediates detected by 2D gel analysis. (C) 2D gel analysis of the HindIII-KpnI ars3001 rDNA region. Wild-type (WT), mus81, pol1-1, and mus81 pol1-1 cells were incubated in YES media at the restrictive temperature of 35°C for 5 hr, and genomic DNA was analyzed as described in the Supplemental Data at http://www.molecule.org/cgi/content/full/12/3/747/DC1. The proportion of X-shaped DNA molecules relative to the amount of Y structures was quantified and is shown for each cell type before (4°C) and after (65°C) branch migration. The arrow indicates the position of the dot corresponding to the linear duplex products derived from the X-shaped DNA molecules by branch migration. (D) Analysis of the StuI-BamHI rDNA region as in (C). Molecular Cell 2003 12, 747-759DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00342-3)