Fine-tuning in the models with non-universal gaugino masses

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fine Tuning Standard Model and Beyond Peter Athron Dr David Miller In collaboration with.
Advertisements

THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM IN SUSY AND LITTLE HIGGS
Kiwoon Choi PQ-invariant multi-singlet NMSSM
Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Fine Tuning In Supersymmetric Models.
Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Quantifying Fine Tuning (arXiv: )
Effective Operators in the MSSM Guillaume Drieu La Rochelle, LAPTH.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Memorial Conference in Honor of Julius Wess. Topics in Gauge Mediation Nathan Seiberg IAS Based on: Meade, NS and Shih, arXiv: NS, Volansky and.
6 August, 2007 at SI2007. Phys.Rev.D75:025019,2007, ArXiv: [hep-th]. Based on articles : In collaboration with Hiroyuki Abe (YITP), Tatsuo Kobayashi.
Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Stockholm Nov MSSM Higgs Searches at LEP Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University.
Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Higgs Boson Mass In SUSY Seesaw Model Jin Min Yang Based on: Cao, Yang , Phys. Rev. D 71, ( 2005 ) [ hep-ph/ ] Institute of Theoretical Physics,
B. Dutta Texas A&M University Phys.Rev.Lett.100:181801,2008; arXiv: ; To appear Grand Unified Models, Proton Decay and Phase of Collaborator: Yukihiro.
REHEATING TEMPERATURE IN GAUGE MEDIATION MODELS AND COMPRESSED PARTICLE SPECTRUM Olechowski, SP, Turzynski, Wells (ABOUT RECONCILING SUPERSYMMETRIC DARK.
1 What do we want to know? Measure the SUSY masses/parameters 4 Independent Variables  M=10.6 GeV.
Mitsuru Kakizaki (University of Toyama)
As a test case for quark flavor violation in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
A.F.Kord Sabzevar Tarbiat Moallem University (Iran) September 2011.
Reconstruction of Fundamental SUSY Parameters at LHC and LC
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
Korea CMS-Theory meeting, CERN, January 14, 2011.
Supersymmetric Models with 125 GeV Higgs Masahiro Yamaguchi (Tohoku University) 17 th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow State.
NMSSM & B-meson Dileptonic Decays Jin Min Yang ITP, Beijing arXiv: Heng, Wang, Oakes, Xiong, JMY 杨 金 民杨 金 民.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Natural Solution to the Supersymmetry Electroweak Fine-Tuning Problem Tianjun Li Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Yellow Mountain,
Paweł Pachołek IFT UW Scalars 2011 Warsaw
Low-scale Gaugino Mediation in Warped Spacetime Toshifumi Yamada Sokendai, KEK in collaboration with Nobuchika Okada (Univ. of Alabama ) arXiv: May 11,
Flavor induced EDMs with tanbeta enhanced corrections Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Aug. 4, 2007 Summer Institute 2007 In collaborated with: J.Hisano.
The effect of ATLAS Run-1 supersymmetric searches in the pMSSM Chaowaroj Wanotayaroj Center for High Energy Physics, University of Oregon On behalf of.
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
Impact of quark flavour violation on the decay in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin.
DIS2003 A.Tilquin Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at LEP What is the Standard Model Why to go beyond and how Supersymmetry Higgs sector.
Lei Wu arXiv: JHEP 1402 (2014) 049 In collaboration with: C. Han, A. Kobakhidze, N. Liu, A. Saavedra and J.M. Yang Light Higgsinos and Naturalness.
Sfermion Flavor and Proton Decay in Minimal SU(5) GUT with High-scale SUSY Natsumi Nagata 26 June, 2014 PASCOS 2014 Warsaw, Poland Based on N. Nagata and.
新学術領域研究 先端加速器LHCが切り拓くテラスケールの素粒子物理学 ~真空と時空への新たな挑戦~ 研究会 2013年5月23日〜25日
The study of q q production at LHC in the l l channel and sensitivity to other models Michihisa Takeuchi ~~ LL ± ± (hep-ph/ ) Kyoto Univ. (YITP),
Phenomenology of NMSSM in TeV scale mirage mediation
Charged Higgs boson decay in supersymmetric TeV scale seesaw model
Minimal SUSY SU(5) GUT in High-scale SUSY
Metastable supersymmetry breaking vacua from conformal dynamics
Origin of large At in the MSSM with extra vector-like matters
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
SUSY at LEP2 (third generation and ewinos)
Gluon Contribution to Dark Matter Direct Detection
WHAT IS Msusy? I am grateful to the Organisers for this title! I understand it reflects certain frustration….
Dark Matter Phenomenology of the GUT-less CMSSM
Fine Tuning In Supersymmetric Models
MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS
Collider Phenomenology of SUSY Cosmic Connections &
NMSSM & B-meson Dileptonic Decays
Flavor Violating Higgs Decays in Supersymmetry with and without R parity --- Talk at SUSY 06 OTTO C. W. KONG --- Nat'l Central U, Taiwan.
Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo)
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies Masaki Asano hep-ph/
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
Phenomenology of SUSY Models with Non-universal Sfermions
Higgs-mediated chargino-neutralino two-loop EDMs
Draw the balance scales shown below on a blank page after Page 105.
非最小超对称唯象研究: 工作汇报 杨 金 民 中科院 理论物理所 南开大学.
Electric Dipole Moments in PseudoDirac Gauginos
CEPC-Physics Workshop
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Institute of Theoretical Physics, CAS
Dissipative effects on MSSM inflation
Presentation transcript:

Fine-tuning in the models with non-universal gaugino masses Yuji Omura ( Kyoto University) with Hiroyuki Abe ,Tatsuo Kobayashi and Haruhiko Terao

Outline 1.Introduction The Little Hierarchy Problem The ways to analyze the problem 2.The fine-tuning in bottom-up approach 3.The fine-tuning in models with non- universal gaugino masses 4.Conclusion

1.Introduction Minimum Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) Little Hierarchy Problem Lightest Higgs mass bound is as follows : ; This maximum value must be larger than 114.4 GeV (LEP bound). On the other hand, MSSM has the EW constraint; This large stop mass would cause the fine-tuning of . At least 2% fine-tuning is required.

The ways and the tools to analyze the fine-tuning ; The up sector Higgs mass term is evaluated within one-loop calculation, Generally, the Little Hierarchy problem is discussed by tuning these higher-scale parameters. Fine-tuning parameters stand for the sensitivities of b to . EW constraint is within the one-loop approximation. =1 : 100% tuning required =10 : 10% tuning =100 : 1% tuning

2.Fine-tuning in bottom-up approach We regard all parameters at GUT scale as the independent ones . This means we need care about the all fine-tuning parameters. Constraints which limit the parameters at GUT 1. Higgs mass bound; 2. stop mass bound ;(Now our model has only top yukawa coupling.) 3.gaugino mass bounds Assumptions 1.The bottom yukawa can be ignored. 2.Sfermion mass terms are zero at GUT scale. We just concentrate on three gaugino masses and A-term. >95.7GeV

Between the red lines, The black line; Inside the circle, Between the Dot lines, The coefficient of squared gluino mass is 10 times as large as of the others. For all of the fine-tuning parameters to be O(1), 3

Black region; Above Dot line ; Between the thick lines; Between the red lines; The larger wino mass makes the squared stop mass negative.

the fine-tuning parameters ,A-term ,stop masses ,higgs mass bound and gaugino masses are as follows;

3.Fine-tuning in models with non-universal gaugino masses Assumptions One SUSY breaking scale( ) and some relations among gaugino masses. For example, Anomaly mediation; Mirage mediation; Without attention to ,we could look for parameterization, It is just important that the larger It’s easy to be beyond LEP bound. It’s difficult to avoid the fine-tuning. Notice that we also set the sfermion masses at GUT scale to zero. for

Between two red lines Solid lines are Below a blue line

For ; at , ( ) This means where Notice unless , is larger than 10. For example, at

4.Conclusion Bottom-up approach ; The coefficient of SU(3) gaugino mass is ten times as large as the others whithin one-loop calculation. The gluino mass should be set to as small as possible , to avoid the fine-tunings of all parameters. should be less than 120GeV for to be O(1). In some models which have some relations among parameters at GUT scale; Without attentions to and ,we can find the gaugino-mass hierarchy which leads O(1) . 3 at GUT scale. ( ) at weak scale.

For higgs mass above the LEP bound, This large top squark mass causes to be too much larger than . The less than 5% fine-tuning is required.

The larger It’s easy to be beyond LEP bound. It’s difficult to avoid the fine-tuning. If should be cared about , must be as little as possible. For example, But, if it need not be, ;This is solution