Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Advertisements

Constitutive NF-κB activation by the t(11;18)(q21;q21) product in MALT lymphoma is linked to deregulated ubiquitin ligase activity  Honglin Zhou, Ming-Qing.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Annapoorni Rangarajan, Sue J. Hong, Annie Gifford, Robert A. Weinberg 
PML Is a Direct p53 Target that Modulates p53 Effector Functions
The Ewing's sarcoma oncoprotein EWS/FLI induces a p53-dependent growth arrest in primary human fibroblasts  Stephen L Lessnick, Caroline S Dacwag, Todd.
Self-Excising Retroviral Vectors Encoding the Cre Recombinase Overcome Cre- Mediated Cellular Toxicity  Daniel P. Silver, David M. Livingston  Molecular.
Endoglin differentially regulates TGF-β-induced Smad2/3 and Smad1/5 signalling and its expression correlates with extracellular matrix production and.
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
The Rb-Related p130 Protein Controls Telomere Lengthening through an Interaction with a Rad50-Interacting Protein, RINT-1  Ling-Jie Kong, Alison R. Meloni,
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Short Telomeres Limit Tumor Progression In Vivo by Inducing Senescence
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages e2 (May 2010)
Stefan W. Stoll, Jessica L. Johnson, Yong Li, Laure Rittié, James T
Level of EGFR inhibition determines cell death response in EGFR mutant GBM cells. Level of EGFR inhibition determines cell death response in EGFR mutant.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Decreased Growth Inhibitory Responses of Squamous Carcinoma Cells to Interferon-γ Involve Failure to Recruit cki Proteins into cdk2 Complexes  Beth L.
Ras Enhances Myc Protein Stability
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Daniel Wolf, Stephen P. Goff  Cell 
NF1 downregulation activates MAPK pathway signaling.
The Mammalian UV Response
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
The oncogenic potential of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus cyclin is exposed by p53 loss in vitro and in vivo  Emmy W. Verschuren, Juha Klefstrom,
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages (May 1999)
Thymidylate synthase as an oncogene
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
Inappropriate Activation of the TSC/Rheb/mTOR/S6K Cassette Induces IRS1/2 Depletion, Insulin Resistance, and Cell Survival Deficiencies  O.Jameel Shah,
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Mutations in Human ARF Exon 2 Disrupt Its Nucleolar Localization and Impair Its Ability to Block Nuclear Export of MDM2 and p53  Yanping Zhang, Yue Xiong 
The oncogenic potential of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus cyclin is exposed by p53 loss in vitro and in vivo  Emmy W. Verschuren, Juha Klefstrom,
Identification of genotype-selective antitumor agents using synthetic lethal chemical screening in engineered human tumor cells  Sonam Dolma, Stephen.
Thijn R Brummelkamp, René Bernards, Reuven Agami  Cancer Cell 
Pituitary Tumor-Transforming Gene 1 Enhances Proliferation and Suppresses Early Differentiation of Keratinocytes  Yosuke Ishitsuka, Yasuhiro Kawachi,
Oncogenic Ras-Induced Expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 Promotes Autophagic Cell Death and Limits Clonogenic Survival  Mohamed Elgendy, Clare Sheridan,
p53 stabilization is decreased upon NFκB activation
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
The role of SRC-C3G-RAP1 signaling in transformation induced by CRKL
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Livio Trusolino, Andrea Bertotti, Paolo M Comoglio  Cell 
John M. Lamar, Vandana Iyer, C. Michael DiPersio 
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Transcriptional Regulation of AKT Activation by E2F
Changes in integrin expression during adipocyte differentiation
Shipra Das, Olga Anczuków, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
The Tumor Suppressor PP2A Aβ Regulates the RalA GTPase
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Bcl-2 and bcl-xL Antisense Oligonucleotides Induce Apoptosis in Melanoma Cells of Different Clinical Stages  Robert A. Olie, Christoph Hafner, Renzo Küttel,
Expression of dominant-negative RasN17 completely suppresses Ras activation in Rh1 cells. Expression of dominant-negative RasN17 completely suppresses.
Nucleolar Arf Tumor Suppressor Inhibits Ribosomal RNA Processing
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
The tumor-suppressive functions of the human INK4A locus
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 301-310 (October 2003) Tumor suppressor p16INK4a determines sensitivity of human cells to transformation by cooperating cellular oncogenes  Sarah Drayton, Janice Rowe, Rebecca Jones, Radost Vatcheva, Darren Cuthbert-Heavens, John Marshall, Mike Fried, Gordon Peters  Cancer Cell  Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 301-310 (October 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00242-3

Figure 1 Expression of Myc and Ras in Leiden HDFs Leiden HDFs immortalized with hTERT (LT cells) were infected with retroviruses encoding Myc, Myc+Ras, or empty vector controls. After drug selection, the cell pools were analyzed by immunoblotting for the indicated proteins. Note that Myc induces expression of the β-ARF/p16 fusion protein (detected with a p16INK4a-specific antibody), as well as p53 and p21CIP1. Analogous data for LT cells infected with the Ras retrovirus were reported elsewhere (Brookes et al., 2002). Cancer Cell 2003 4, 301-310DOI: (10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00242-3)

Figure 2 Myc arrests HDFs by upregulating p16INK4a Normal (Hs68) and Leiden HDFs were infected with pRetroSuper encoding shRNA against either Arf or Ink4a (Voorhoeve and Agami, 2003), along with the empty vector control, and selected in hygromycin. The cell pools were subsequently infected with a retrovirus encoding Myc, and corresponding control, and selected in puromycin. A and B: Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies against Myc, Mek, and p16INK4a. The p16INK4a in Hs68 cells was detected using the JC8 monoclonal antibody, and the β-ARF/p16 fusion protein in Leiden cells was detected using DCS50 (Brookes et al., 2002). C and D: Cell proliferation was assessed by pulse labeling with BrdU and measuring the proportion of BrdU-positive cells by immunohistochemistry. Cancer Cell 2003 4, 301-310DOI: (10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00242-3)

Figure 3 Myc and Ras cause anchorage independence and morphological transformation of LT cells A: Appearance of anchorage-independent colonies approximately three weeks after seeding 104 cells in 0.2% agarose. Note that colonies induced by Ras (LTR cells) were visible by microscopy (see Table 1 and Brookes et al., 2002). B and C: Low and high power photomicrographs, respectively, of LTM cells infected with a 1:100 dilution of the Ras retrovirus or vector control (pBABEbleo). Cells were stained with Geimsa for 20 min and washed with water. Cancer Cell 2003 4, 301-310DOI: (10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00242-3)

Figure 4 LTRM cells are less adhesive and release autocrine growth factors A: Levels of the indicated integrins in LTRM cells and tumors T1–T5 are shown relative to those in parental LT cells. B: A similar analysis comparing the LT, LTR, LTM, and LTRM pools. C: Ability of LTRM cells to produce autocrine growth factors. The indicated cells were placed in medium containing 0.2% FCS for 48 hr, at which point conditioned medium was recovered and added to Hs68 cells that had been rendered quiescent in 0.2% FCS. The cells were then labeled with BrdU for 16 hr and the proportion of BrdU-positive cells estimated by immunohistochemistry. Medium containing either 0.2% or 10% serum represented negative and positive controls, respectively. The left and right panels show results from separate experiments. Cancer Cell 2003 4, 301-310DOI: (10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00242-3)

Figure 5 Gene expression patterns in LTRM cells and tumors A: Immunoblotting for the indicated proteins in LT and LTRM cell pools and the LTRM tumors T1–T5. Mek signals confirmed equal loading. B: Induction of p53 and p21CIP1 in LTRM and tumor cells 18 hr after UV irradation (15J/m2) as described (Brookes et al., 2002). C: Reverse transcription-PCR detection of Arf (540 bp product) and Cdk4 (936 bp product) in LTRM cells and tumors T1–T5. Cancer Cell 2003 4, 301-310DOI: (10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00242-3)

Figure 6 Genome integrity of LTRM tumor cells A and C: Examples of M-FISH analyses on individual tumor cells revealing the iso18q and t(14;20) abnormalities, respectively. B and D: Detection of the corresponding abnormalities in tumors T1 and T2 by CGH on gridded BAC arrays. Only the relevant chromosomes are displayed. E: Proportions of cells with the indicated karyotypes in each tumor. Cancer Cell 2003 4, 301-310DOI: (10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00242-3)