AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATR Combi & Freighter  Exit.
Advertisements

Marcelo M. Hirschler GBH International
Halon Replacement for Airplane Cargo Compartments What it Takes Fourth Triennial International Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Lisbon, Portugal.
Summary of NFPA 101 Interior Finish Requirements
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Electric Wire Insulation Study: Flammable Properties and Testing Methods Materials Working Group.
Marine, Railway and ground Transportation ACOUSTIC MATERIALS for.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Fire Safety of Road Vehicles Status and Trends Fire safety road vehicles Japan, September 2014 Presentation given at Tokyo September 2014.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Discussion on Format of New Test.
Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detection
T ubular D aylight G uidance S ystems : building codes and the environment Mohammed Al-Marwaee and David Carter School of Architecture University of Liverpool.
Overview Cal/OSHA Section 4848, Title 8 NFPA 51B FM GLOBAL FM Approval
Ensuring fire safety in buses Michael Försth, Asbjørn Hagerupsen, Jan Petzäll Informal document No. GRSG (95th GRSG, 21 – 24 October 2008 agenda.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Task 3.4. Validation of horizontal solutions Fire and mechanical characterization.
Cabin Component Design Features Fire Properties of Corefiller, Adhesive, „Ditch and Pot“ March 2009 Presented by Ingo WEICHERT TBCEE12.
Presented By: Claire Fleece A Solution to Fighting Inaccesible Fires.
Fire.
Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detection David Blake FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City Airport, NJ Phone:
Concept Equipment design and manufacture fire testing instruments according to international test methods. Our range of products are used to test the fire.
FIREPROOF AND FIRE RESISTANT MATERIALS Federal Aviation Administration Project Manager: J. Reinhardt William J. Hughes Technical Center Airport and Aircraft.
RANKING FLAMMABILITY OF AIRCRAFT MATERIALS USING MICROSCALE COMBUSTION CALORIMETRY Richard E. Lyon and Richard N. Walters* Fire Safety Branch AAR-440 FAA.
08 June 2006Portland; Oregon; USAPeter Corbeeel Reducing the risk of smoke and fire in transport airplanes: related EASA rulemaking actions Peter Corbeel.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City By: Rich Lyon, AJP-6320 Date: October 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration.
JAA Cabin Safety Steering Group (CSSG) JAA Future Cabin Safety Plan / Coordination with EASA 4th Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference – Marnix.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
ULD Passive Fire Protected Contact:Dipl. Ing. Robert Huebner BARO-Agentur UG T: Cell: Proven.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Fire-Related Properties of Materials Chapter 7. Mehta, Scarborough, and Armpriest : Building Construction: Principles, Materials, and Systems © 2008 Pearson.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness Preventive Maintenance R1.
Review of Handbook Chapters Pat Cahill
Engineering Analysis of NFPA 285 Tested Assemblies
Toulouse Aeronautical Test Centre (CEAT)
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Federal Aviation Administration COMPOSITE MATERIAL FIRE FIGHTING Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems (EAPAS) Presented by: Massoud Sadeghi FAA - Aging Systems Program Manager EAPAS Workshop November 2002.
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS March Materials Meeting Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center June 17 th & 18 th, 2008.
IAMFTWG March 1-2, 2011 – Savannah, GA, USA Robert I. Ochs, FAA Fire Safety Team AJP-6322 Federal Aviation Administration Burnthrough and NexGen Burner.
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Update Handbook Chapters IAMFT WG, Cologne,
Developing Fire Safety Assessments Future Considerations Fire and Materials Working Group March 4 – 5, 2009 Daniel Slaton, Boeing.
Presentation to Transport Canada November 2008 – Fire & Cabin Safety Research Integrated Fire Protection Systems – Update.
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Special Conditions for Passenger Airplanes,
J Developments in: - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Floor Coverings - Low Smoke Fire Resistant Interior Repair Compounds.
MINISTÈRE DE LA DÉFENSE Hidden fire program :Evaluation of materials located in inaccessible areas with the radiant panel LISBONNE November.
Federal Aviation Administration Status of Research & Testing to Replace Halon Extinguishing Agents in Civil Aviation Douglas Ingerson Louise Speitel Constantine.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Hazard Assessment Steve Summer Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration Flammability Requirements Improvement June 24, 2010.
Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detector Certification. David Blake FAA Technical Center Atlantic City, NJ 3 rd Triennial International Fire and Cabin.
Certificate number: FS453/02 Application FS21 Firestop Panel is used to firestop mechanical and electrical services where they pass through fire rated.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
NASP 2008 Annual Conference Subro Goes Hollywood! SUBRO GOES HOLLYWOOD NASP 2008 Annual Conference.
Aircraft Maintenance Engineering
Federal Aviation Administration COMPOSITE MATERIAL FIRE FIGHTING Presented to:International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Köln, Germany Presented.
Chapter 5 Fire Behavior and Building Construction
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
Smokes toxicity & opacity
Fabric Air Dispersion Systems
Fire Characteristics.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Fuel The topic ‘fuel’ is divided into three parts:
- Strictly Confidential -
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
Dr. Patrick Seiniger BMVI, Section StV 22
- Strictly Confidential -
- Strictly Confidential -
Presentation transcript:

AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS 07/04/2014 AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS (c) Gerflor Strictly Confidential

OVERVIEW There are two main regulations in the world which are very similar.  The Federal Aviation Regulations, or FARs, are rules prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) governing all aviation activities in the United States.  FAR Part 25 – Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes  FAR Part 25.853 – Compartment interiors  FAR Part 25.855 – Cargo or baggage compartments  FAR Part 25.856 – Thermal / acoustic insulation materials  In Europe since 2014, the old rules (Joint Airworthiness Requirements, JAR) have been replaced by the Certifications Specifications (CS), which are managed by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).  CS-25 - Airworthiness of Large Aeroplanes  CS-25.853 – Compartment interiors  CS-25.855 – Cargo or baggage compartments  CS-25.856 – Thermal / acoustic insulation materials C. Vinson

CS / FAR 25 Specifications Parts Test method Specifications CS / FAR 25.853 Compartment interiors a) Materials including finishes or decorative surface CS / FAR 25 Appendix F Part I (i) Interior ceiling and wall panels, Partitions, Galley structure, Structural flooring, Vertical Bunsen burner test Ignition time 60s (FTMS 191 Method 5902) Burned lenght (cm) <15 Flame time(s) <15 Drip extinguishing time(s) <3 (ii) Floor coverings, Textiles, Seat cushions, Padding, Decorative and nondecorative coated fabrics, Leather, Trays and galley furnishings, Ignition time 12s Burned lenght (cm) <20 Drip extinguishing time(s) <5 (iv) Plastic windows and signs, parts constructed in elastomeric materials, seat belts, Horizontal Bunsen burner test (FTMS 191 Method 5906) Burn rate (mm/mn) <64 c) Additional requirements for seat cushions Appendix F Part II Seat cushions Oil burner test Calorimeter Burned lenght (cm) <43 Weight loss (%) <10 d) Additional requirements for interior components for aeroplanes with passenger capacity ≥ 20 Appendix F Part IV Interior ceiling and wall panels, Partitions, Galley structures OSU Rate of Heat Release (ASTM E906) Total Heat Release over the first 2 mn (kW mn/m²) ≤65 Peak Heat Release Rate (kW/m²) ≤65 Appendix F Part V Smoke Chamber (flaming mode) (ASTM E662) Smoke density Ds after 4mn ≤200 C. Vinson

CS / FAR 25 Specifications Parts Test method Specifications CS / FAR 25.855 Cargo or baggage compartments Class C and Class F cargo or baggage compartments CS / FAR 25 Appendix F Part III Ceiling and sidewall liner panels Flame penetration No flame penetration within 5 minutes after application of the flame source Peak temperature measured at 10 cm above the upper surface of the horizontal test sample must not exceed 2040C All other materials used in the construction of the cargo or baggage compartment must meet the applicable test criteria prescribed in Part I of Appendix F, or other approved equivalent methods. CS / FAR 25.856 Thermal / acoustic insulation materials a) Thermal / acoustic insulation materials Appendix F Part VI Installed in the fuselage Flame propagation No flame propagation beyond 51 mm Flame time after removal of the pilot burner (s) <3 b) Thermal / acoustic insulation materials Appendix F Part VII Passenger capacity ≥ 20 Burnthrough Flame penetration in less than 4 mn < 2.27 W/cm2 on the cold side of the insulation specimens at a point 30.5 cm C. Vinson

CS / FAR 25 The test methods and specifications are different according to : - the type of products - the place where it’s installed The differents parameters measured are : - Self extinguishing - Flame propagation - Flame penetration - Weight loss - Heat release - Smoke density (flaming mode)  No mention of smoke toxicity assessment C. Vinson

Additionnal requirements of aircraft manufacturers Concerning Smoke (density and toxicity), major aircraft manufacturers have developed similar internal standards.  For AIRBUS : AITM3.0005  For BOEING : BSS 7239 Standards based on the smoke chamber method (idem CS / FAR 25 Appendix F Part V) with a measurement of density and toxicity in the same time. Smoke density : same requirement than CS / FAR 25 Appendix F Part V but a non-flaming mode. Smoke toxicity Gas component Concentration limit Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 100 ppm Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 150 ppm Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Nitrous Gases (NO / NO2) Carbon Monoxyde (CO) 1000 ppm C. Vinson

Conclusion The requirement of smoke appeared initially with the same objective as the caloric release (OSU) : to control the flash-over (which may seem strange because we don’t really see the link between optical density and flash-over). The authorities considers today that all the regulatory criteria for the selection of materials are sufficient to ensure that a fire will not develop sufficiently (or will be controlled) before the passengers are evacuated, and thus that the production of smoke and effluents toxic substances reach a critical level. In addition, the light signaling on the ground, the evacuation instructions and the time necessary for the evacuation of the apparatus limits the interest of the criterion of opacity (discussions are ongoing on whether to maintain the smoke requirement). C. Vinson