Mod_06_18 – PMEA Theoretically there should always be at least one Bid Offer Acceptance (BOA) Quantity which is unflagged and is therefore the Marginal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
Advertisements

EIUG – Wheeling Methodologies
Amine Abada 06/10/2014 ERI SWE TERRE #2 Trans European Replacement Reserve Exchange.
Elasticity of Advertising Ted Mitchell. How to Increase Unit Sales Increase Product Quality Offer more Product Features/Service Increase Advertising/Shelve.
Short Term Testing Mod 65_08 Modification Committee 25 th November 2010.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Contribution and Break-even Analysis A2 Accounting.
Ofgem’s Gas SCR – Background on the DSR mechanism Stephen Jarvis 02/07/14.
Revision of the UNC Post-Emergency Arrangements draft proposal July 2009.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Carrie Tucker Supervisor, Day-Ahead Market DAM data supporting MCWG/CWG credit parameters discussion February 29, 2012.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Trades and Transfers Workshop, 6 th November 2007.
DAM Collateral Requirements Carrie Bivens Manager, Day-Ahead Market Dec 16,
Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.
Energy SectorEnergy Automation: Shafiu © Siemens AG 2010 Page 1 HV and EHV allocation of harmonic rights.
1 February, 2012 QMWG S&B Protocol Clarifications QSE-Requested Decommitment of a DAM Commitment ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
Bell Ringer
ECO 120 Lecture Note: Tools and Conduct of Monetary Policy
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Entry Capacity Overrun price calculation
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
Measurement of non market volume output Clarification item C10
Correction of Minor Material Drafting Errors
Mod_08_18 – TPAR Current drafting assumes QPAR > 0;
Significance Tests: The Basics
Review of the requirements regarding Unsecured Bad Debt within I-SEM
Redefinition of Schedule Production Cost
Chapter 18: Non-Firm Quantities
Mod_07_18 – Variable b The formulas used to calculate NIV and PAR tags in the rules rely on determining values for b (the rank of a particular action)
MOD_27_18 Martin Kerin 06th September 2018
Mod_07_18 – Variable b The formulas used to calculate NIV and PAR tags rely on determining values for b (the rank of a particular action) and beta (the.
Mod_25_18 Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt
Back-up flexibility for this winter Slow R3 non-reserved power
Paragraph 14 Table 2: Mod_15_18 – IP/QBOA
Mod_34_18 Removal of Make-Whole Payments for biased quantities and negative imbalance revenue, and small clarifications to determination of Start Up Costs.
Pedro Cruz Yábar Brussels, 21st June 2016
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
CMC_04_19 Finalisation of Exchange Rate in Auction Information Pack
Credit Cover Signage and Subscript Correction
Ritchard Hewitt – September 2010
Determining Marginal Energy Action Prices Modification Proposal
Summary Issue Modification Aim Effect of the mod Impacts
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
EU Balancing Code – Mod 494 Imbalance Charge Amendments
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
Entry Overrun Calculation
MOD_05_19_V2 Amendment to Uninstructed Imbalance Charge (CUNIMB) to correct for negative price scenarios 11th April 2019.
Mod_05_18 – ASP Current Reserve Scarcity Price Curve parameters are:
Trans European Replacement Reserve Exchange
MOD_03_19 Amended application of the Market Back Up Price if an Imbalance Price(s) fail to calculate Energia.
CMC_05_18 Combining Candidate Units into a Capacity Market Unit
Mod_32_18 Working Group 2 Dublin, 13 March 2019.
Determining Marginal Energy Action Prices Modification Proposal
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quiz 02/18/2016 Foothill Chemistry.
Modification Proposal 136
Meter Read Rejections ..
Correction to No Load Cost - “and” vs “or”
Mod 09_19 - Removal of locational constraints from Imbalance Pricing
Mod_10_19 Removal of Negative QBOAs Related to Dispatchable Priority Dispatch Units from the Imbalance Price 27th June 2019.
Percentage Yields.
Correction to COP and clarification to CNLR
Quality Adjustment Review of UK Consumer Price Statistics
Market Back Up Price Reference Corrections
Capacity Market Code Modifications
Presentation transcript:

Mod_06_18 – PMEA Theoretically there should always be at least one Bid Offer Acceptance (BOA) Quantity which is unflagged and is therefore the Marginal Energy Action; However this does not account for other aspects of pricing which could remove the unflagged action from the process on rare occasions, such as the De Minimis Acceptance Threshold (DMAT) parameter which excludes BOAs with sufficiently small quantities; In the current drafting the process for calculating the Marginal Energy Action Price has no stated outcome for what should happen if there is no unflagged action, therefore the process “fails” and the Market Back Up Price for the whole half-hour should be the result; However this removes all of the information which is present in the flagged actions of the cost of balancing in a period, including Imbalance Pricing Periods where the process ran correctly; Also the current process for when there is an overly large proportion of actions flagged than required to meet the NIV is to untag some of those actions in the NIV Tagging stage: this proposal is to extend that process to the scenario when all actions are flagged

Mod_06_18 – PMEA This proposal would be to implement a pure NIV Tagging approach in situations where there are no unflagged actions, by unflagging the volume of actions required to meet the NIV, keeping the most expensive actions tagged out: This is expanding the current treatment of the situation where there are too many flagged actions, where some actions become untagged during the NIV Tagging process. Setting PMEA to PCAP or PFLOOR is a means of allowing the process to continue and carry out pure NIV Tagging in a way which means PCAP and PFLOOR will not impact the final result: The Replacement Bid Offer Price stage of the process will ensure that this PMEA will not continue in the process unless there actually was a BOA at the price of PCAP or PFLOOR. The other part of this proposal is a simple moving of a parenthesis to ensure that the meaning of the drafting unambiguously matches the intended design: Intention is for PMEA to be the marginal (highest/lowest) priced BOA whose associated Imbalance Price Flag is equal to one, however the current wording does not make this clear.