Mobile phones as a tool for learning by Mats Reinsby -2007-

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Learning Technology Standards A Layperson's Guide to Who s Who and What s What Updated November 25, 2002 by Jonathan Dean Oracle iLearning Product Management.

Advertisements

Saras Shareable Rich Media Learning Object Repositories and Management for e-Learning Chitra Dorai IBM T.J. Watson Research Center New York

WEB BASED DEVICE INDEPENDENT MOBILE MAP APPLICATIONS. THE m-CHARTIS SYSTEM John GarofalakisTheofanis – Aristofanis MichailAthanasios Plessas Nowadays people.

CNES implementation of the ISO standard An extension of the current CNES implementation of the ISO metadata standard.

IST TEL, 25 Feb. 2004, Luxembourg, Lp. 1 Progress through Continuity Standards & Specifications for Learning Technologies Insights from Ariadne Erik Duval.

Introduction to HTML, XHTML, and CSS

Standardisation Issues in eLearning by Diptendu Dutta AUNWESHA Presented at IEEE Computer Chapter 19 th October, 2001.

Lawrence C. Ragan Penn State’s World Campus Defining Quality Standards for Online Education CADE, Calgary May 2002.

Towards Adaptive Web-Based Learning Systems Katerina Georgouli, MSc, PhD Associate Professor T.E.I. of Athens Dept. of Informatics Tempus.

A Standard and an eLearning Platform for LEMAIA: SCORM and Moodle Antonio De Nicola.

Learning Content Standards Demos, Details, and De-mystification Robby Robson, Eduworks Chair, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee

University of Piraeus Department of Technology Education and Digital Systems Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas(C.E.R.T.H.) Informatics and Telematics.

Trends & Issues: Breakout Session Robby Robson Standards Evangelist.

UNDERSTANDING JAVA APIS FOR MOBILE DEVICES v0.01.

Create mobile content using a mobile-friendly knowledge management system: The Athabasca University (AU) experience.

Integration of Hand-Held Devices into Collaboration Environments IC’02 Las Vegas, NV June June Geoffrey Fox, Sung-Hoon Ko, Kangseok Kim,

Content Reusability in Learning Management Systems Priit Mägi DAP01s.

IM Lab NCCU 1 Introduction of SCORM: Sharable Content Object Reference Model Hao-Chuan Wang Computer Science Department National Chengchi University 2003.

1 MPEG-21 : Goals and Achievements Ian Burnett, Rik Van de Walle, Keith Hill, Jan Bormans and Fernando Pereira IEEE Multimedia, October-November 2003.

Philips Research France Delivery Context in MPEG-21 Sylvain Devillers Philips Research France Anthony Vetro Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories.

The Multi-model, Metadata-driven Approach to Content and Layout Adaptation Knowledge and Data Engineering Group (KDEG) Trinity College,

Asst.Prof.Dr.Surasak Mungsing. By: Akshay Kumar Sharable Content Object Reference Model.

TELEStraining Inc. The eTrainerCB: Using Instructional Templates To Create Training SCO’s Lucio Teles, Ph.D., President, TELEStraining Inc. Fuchun Xiao,

Supporting Collaborative Learning Activities with SCORM Albert Ip, Digital Learning Systems Ric Canale, University of Melbourne.

Wednesday, October 22, E-Learning Objects: The Value of SCORM and MPEG-7 Packaging for Digital Media Assets TRACK 3: TEACHING AND LEARNING Thursday,

Implementation Alternatives for Web-based Learning Architecture by Diptendu Dutta Anwesa ( Presented at IWDC 2001 Kolkata 28 th December,

Learning Resource iNterchange

Update: © Copyright 2002, Carnegie Mellon University All Right Reserved 1/59 ADL/SCORM - What Does it Mean for Developers of ICT Projects? Daniel.

IT Standards for Learning

SCORM By: Akshay Kumar. SCORM 2 What we want? What is SCORM? What is SCORM? Connection with e-learning Connection with e-learning Application of XML Technology.

Accelerating e-Learning Interoperability Introducing the CLEO Lab Tyde Richards IBM Mindspan Solutions Daniel R. Rehak Carnegie Mellon University.

Chapter 1 Introduction to HTML, XHTML, and CSS

New trends in Semantic Web Cagliari, December, 2nd, 2004 Using Standards in e-Learning Claude Moulin UMR CNRS 6599 Heudiasyc University of Compiègne (France)

THE ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (ADL) INITIATIVE

José Paulo Leal | Ricardo Queirós CRACS & INESC-Porto LA Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto Rua do Campo Alegre, Porto PORTUGAL.

HTML, XHTML, and CSS Sixth Edition Chapter 1 Introduction to HTML, XHTML, and CSS.

Creating a RLO (Reusable Learning Objects) strategy for the inter-agency Pharmacy Technician blended learning project Presenter: Dr. Carole Bagley, Ph.D.

E-Learning standards and meta-data: Case study ดร. น้ำทิพย์ วิภาวิน Sripatum University Library.

Mastering Adaptive Hypermedia Courseware Authors: Boyan Bontchev, Dessislava Vassileva, Slavomir Grigorov ICETA 2008.

Semantic Learning Instructor: Professor Cercone Razieh Niazi.

LADL2007 Workshop, 20 Sep 2007, Budapest, HU Polyxeni Arapi Nektarios Moumoutzis Manolis Mylonakis George Stylianakis George Theodorakis {xenia, nektar,

A Primer on Metadata Standards From Dublin Core to IEEE LOM Julia Innes Rory McGreal Toni Roberts TeleEducation NB.

10th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems July 8-11, 2012, Vilnius, Lithuania Learner Model’s Utilization in the e-Learning.

Standards, Reusability, and the Mating Habits of Learning Content Robby Robson Eduworks Corporation

Metadata for e-Learning Objects Ya-ning Arthur Chen, Shu-jiun Sophy Chen Computing Centre, Academia Sinica APAN/PRAGMA 2003 Conference in Fukuoka 22 Jan.,

Extending Educational Metadata Schemas to Describe Adaptive Learning Resources Cord Hockemeyer Owen Conlan Paul Lefrere Vincent Wade Dietrich Albert.

The Perfect SCORM Sharable Content Objects. Agenda  Welcome – Who Are We  History Of SCORM (RLOs)  SCORM Solution  The Need For SCORM  Do We Need.

IMS Content Packaging Overview Dec 5, IMS Content Packaging scope Source: IMS Info Model document Fig. 2.1.

SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.

Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania.

DAM Runtime Implementation In a Nutshell By: LCdr Roger St-Pierre.

Adaptive User Interface Modelling for Web-environments T – Antti Martikainen

Quality Assurance in Done by :Salim Mohammed\ Muslim\ Mahmoud \Tariq E-learning.

HTML Concepts and Techniques Fifth Edition Chapter 1 Introduction to HTML.

LTSC Report to SAB1 Learning Technology Standing Committee Sponsor Report October, 2006.

Patricia Ploetz, ABD Academic ADL Co-Lab University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Canadian Association for Distance Education Wise And Witty Weekday Presentation.

School of Education Technology, Beijing Normal University Research on the Organization Model of Ubiquitous Learning Resource Shengquan Yu

Chapter 1 Introduction to HTML, XHTML, and CSS HTML5 & CSS 7 th Edition.

Current metadata standards ISO/IEC MLR new for Curriculum Erlend Øverby’ Chair ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 36 Information Technology for Learning, Education and Training.

The Inclusive Learning Exchange: Supporting Learner-Centric Transformation of Content Laurie Harrison Adaptive Technology Resource Centre University of.

EPortfolio 2004 Accessibility Meta-data IMS AccLIP, AccMD: concepts and applications Liddy Nevile, Andy Heath, with contributions from Jutta Treviranus,

SCORM-kooskõlaliste õpihaldussüsteemide arendamisest Andres Mellik Tallinna Ülikool Veebruar 2006.

The world’s open source learning platform Moodle Mobile SCORM 1.2 player Juan Leyva & Daniel

1 Survey of Profiles from Other Domains XMSF Profile SG 13 January 2004 Curt Blais and NPS MV3250 (Introduction to XML, 1st Quarter 2005) Katherine L.

Update: © Copyright 2004, Carnegie Mellon University Some Rights Reserved 1/79 Daniel Rehak, PhD Professor and Technical Director Learning Systems.

Project 1 Introduction to HTML.

Modularization and Semantics of Learning Objects in a Cooperative Knowledge Space Nadine Ludwig Center for Multimedia in eLearning & eResearch, Berlin.

WEB BASED DEVICE INDEPENDENT MOBILE MAP APPLICATIONS.

Il processo di standardizzazione della formazione in rete

San Jose 2008 AICC William Shook

Presentation transcript:

Mobile phones as a tool for learning by Mats Reinsby

Outline Why use mobile phones for learning? Limitations for mobile as learning tool Why metadata? What is SCORM? Research questions Methods used Results from literature studies The evaluation of SCORM Summary

Why mobile phones? Widespread Portabel Universal Available Learn anytime, anywhere!

Limitations Technical limitations Hard to concentrate in some settings Expensive to download content Difficult to adapt all content to mobile Need metadata to enable filtering of content

Metadata Data about technical and pedagogical requirements Tell the system what it needs from device SCORM allows metadata

SCORM Sharable Content Object Reference Model Project startet by DoD through ADL i 1997 Collection of standards from several international organizations (AICC, ARIADNE, IEEE LTSC, IMS) Resulted in a Content Model for learning material. De facto standard within e- Learningindustry

SCORM CAM Content Aggregation Model Organization SCO or Asset All levels can be tagged Metadata based on IEEE LOM

IEEE LOM Based on XML Developed for e- Learning content Nine categories: Technical and Educational relevant Developed by IEEE LTSC in 2002 General TechnicalRelation Life Cycle EducationalAnnotation Meta-metadata RightsClassification

Outline Why use mobile phones for learning? Limitations for mobile as learning tool Why metadata? What is SCORM? Research questions Methods used Results from literature studies The evaluation of SCORM Summary

Research questions What flaws and shortcomings that will limit the utilization of mobile phones as a tool for learning can be found in the SCORM metadata specifications? 1. What properties are important to consider when serving learning content to mobile devices? 2. What are the most important features of an LMS designed to support the use of mobile devices as a tool for learning? 3. How can the SCORM metadata specifications be extended to better support the delivery of learning content to mobile devices?

Methods Literature study on learning objects Literature study on mobile learning Literature study on SCORM Studying various LMS Studying current and future mobile phones Evaluating SCORM based on criteria identified through studies

10 important properties - Screen properties (based on device detected) -Input requirements (based on device detected) -Processing power (based on device detected) -Storage needs (based on device detected) -Connection speed (based on device detected) -Browser functionality (based on device detected) -Learning situation (based on user input on login) -Learner style (based on learner profile) -Knowledge level (based on learner profile+ history) -Time available (based on user input on login)

Evaluation of SCORM Expositive Very hard Very high video/mpeg PT1M45S Screen properties Input requirements Processing power Storage needs Connection speed Browser functionality Learning situation Learner style Knowledge level Time available

Evaluation of SCORM All 10 properties possible to specify? Consistent syntax? Room for extensions? Model suitable for purpose? Possible to implement good filtering?

Evaluation of SCORM Fully supportedNot supported Size Input Storage Connection Situation Learner style Browser Knowledge Screen size Processing power

Summary – whats missing? Consistent way to describe learning contents requirements to a device Strict schema for metadata tags Element dedicated to describe screen size and resolution A way to indicate required processing power An industry willing to cooperate! …or Tank!

Any questions? Thank you for listening!