Steven Z. DeLuca, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Computer Simulations and Image Processing Reveal Length-Dependent Pulling Force as the Primary Mechanism for C. elegans Male Pronuclear Migration  Akatsuki.
Filopodia-like Actin Cables Position Nuclei in Association with Perinuclear Actin in Drosophila Nurse Cells  Sven Huelsmann, Jari Ylänne, Nicholas H.
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
David J. Katz, T. Matthew Edwards, Valerie Reinke, William G. Kelly 
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Emergence of an Apical Epithelial Cell Surface In Vivo
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Transcriptional Activation of Arabidopsis Axis Patterning Genes WOX8/9 Links Zygote Polarity to Embryo Development  Minako Ueda, Zhongjuan Zhang, Thomas.
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Transiently Reorganized Microtubules Are Essential for Zippering during Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster  Ferenc Jankovics, Damian Brunner  Developmental.
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Tatsuhiko Noguchi, Michiko Koizumi, Shigeo Hayashi  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Asymmetric Positioning and Organization of the Meiotic Spindle of Mouse Oocytes Requires CDC42 Function  Jie Na, Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz  Current Biology 
Overexpressing Centriole-Replication Proteins In Vivo Induces Centriole Overduplication and De Novo Formation  Nina Peel, Naomi R. Stevens, Renata Basto,
Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration  Kari Barlan, Maureen Cetera, Sally Horne-Badovinac 
Regulation of Temporal Identity Transitions in Drosophila Neuroblasts
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Kai Yuan, Antony W. Shermoen, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
Changes in bicoid mRNA Anchoring Highlight Conserved Mechanisms during the Oocyte-to-Embryo Transition  Timothy T. Weil, Richard Parton, Ilan Davis, Elizabeth.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Border Cell Migration Analyzed Using Time- Lapse Live-Cell Imaging  Mohit Prasad, Denise J. Montell  Developmental.
Sebastian Leidel, Pierre Gönczy  Developmental Cell 
Stefano Di Talia, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Alternative Germ Cell Death Pathway in Drosophila Involves HtrA2/Omi, Lysosomes, and a Caspase-9 Counterpart  Keren Yacobi-Sharon, Yuval Namdar, Eli Arama 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Karen G Hales, Margaret T Fuller  Cell 
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Distinct Apical and Basolateral Mechanisms Drive Planar Cell Polarity-Dependent Convergent Extension of the Mouse Neural Plate  Margot Williams, Weiwei.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Franziska Aurich, Christian Dahmann  Cell Reports 
Maternally Inherited Stable Intronic Sequence RNA Triggers a Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop during Development  Mandy Li-Ian Tay, Jun Wei Pek  Current.
Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek  Stem Cell Reports 
Karl Emanuel Busch, Jacky Hayles, Paul Nurse, Damian Brunner 
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Anna Marie Sokac, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Feng Xu, Kangling Zhang, Michael Grunstein  Cell 
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Julio Vazquez, Andrew S Belmont, John W Sedat  Current Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Yuki Hara, Christoph A. Merten  Developmental Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Barriers to Male Transmission of Mitochondrial DNA in Sperm Development  Steven Z. DeLuca, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Developmental Cell  Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 660-668 (March 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.021 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2012 22, 660-668DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.021) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Paternal mtDNA Is Excluded from Mature Sperm and Fertilized Embryos (A) Sequence of nucleotides deleted in mt:ND2del1 (yellow highlight), and the BglII restriction site (red font) that was targeted in the generation of mt:ND2del1. Arrows show the 3′ portion of PCR primers that anneal to wild-type (mt:ND2), but not mutant (mt:ND2del1) mtDNA. (B) Cross scheme and experimental design. (C) PCR genotyping of parental lines that were crossed to follow wild-type paternal mtDNA in (D) and (E). (D) qPCR measuring paternal mtDNA (mt:ND2) transferred to deletion mutant eggs (mt:ND2del1). The mean paternal mtDNA copy number (red dot) in relation to a standard curve (blue dots) is graphed on a “per embryo” basis. Error bar represents standard deviation in three embryo extracts. (E) qPCR measuring the amount of mtDNA (mt:ND2) in sperm stored by mt:ND2del1 females. Y chromosome (red triangle) and sperm mtDNA (red circle) copy number in a representative sperm storage organ extract in relation to standard curves (blue) are graphed on a “per female” basis. In (D) and (E), standard curves were generated by adding 100–12,500 copies of mt:ND2 (blue circles) or Y chromosomal DNA (blue triangles) to control extracts, and graphed on a “per embryo” or “per female” basis. The number of copies of mtDNA per sperm would be given by the number of apparent copies of mt:ND2 (∼30) divided by the number of sperm, which is given by two times the number of copies of the Y chromosome sequence (350 × 2) since only half the sperm have a Y chromosome. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 660-668DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.021) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 mtDNA Nucleoids Disappear during Spermatogenesis (A) Schematic summary of postmeiotic sperm development depicting nuclei (green), mitochondria (red), and investment cones (purple). (B) Onion stage spermatids stained for DNA (PicoGreen: green), and mitochondria (mito-YFP: red). Each nucleus (n) is paired with a large mitochondrial structure, the nebenkern (mt). (C-E) Elongating spermatid bundles stained for DNA (PicoGreen: green) and actin (phalloidin: purple). (C) Elongation stage bundle, 560 μm long. A cluster of normal spermatid nuclei (n), apically discarded spermatid nuclei (n′), and a somatic cell nucleus belonging to a cyst cell (n″) form large staining foci. mtDNA nucleoids (magnified in inset) form much smaller foci throughout the tail bundle. (D and E) Two late elongation stage bundles, 1,729 μm (D) and 1,747 μm (E) long. Numbers indicate distance (μm) of image from basal tip of bundle. Scale bars are 10 μm. (F) Nucleoid density (number of nucleoids/μm) along the lengths of four representative spermatid bundles (each bundle is a different colored line) of the indicated length (μm). (G) Average number of nucleoids per onion stage spermatid (O), elongating spermatid <1,700 μm (E1), elongating spermatid 1,700–1,800 μm (E2), and elongating spermatid >1,800 μm (E3). Error bars indicate standard deviation in a least three cysts. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 660-668DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.021) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 mtDNA Nucleoid Elimination during Spermatid Elongation Requires EndoG (A) Schematic showing the approximate location of the MB07150 minos transposon insertion (red triangle) in relation to the catalytic residues of EndoG (yellow oval). (B) Quantitative RT-PCR measuring EndoG mRNA abundance in adult male flies. The approximate positions of the three primer sets used to measure the abundance of different regions of EndoG mRNA are diagramed in (A). Error bars represent standard deviation in three extracts. (C–E) Spermatid bundles stained for DNA (green), and actin (purple). (C) Late elongation stage EndoGMB07150 mutant bundle, 1,830 μm long. Numbers indicate distance (μm) of image from basal tip of bundle. (D) Cystic bulge of spermatid bundles of the indicated genotype during spermatid individualization. Numbers indicate percentage of the length of the bundle that the cystic bulge has traveled. Rare spermatid nuclei (n) culled during the individualization process. (E) Elongation stage EndoGI mutant bundle, 1,280 μm long. Numbers indicate distance (μm) of image from basal tip of bundle. Scale bars are 10 μm. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2012 22, 660-668DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.021) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Residual mtDNA Nucleoids Are Removed from EndoG Mutant Sperm during Spermatid Individualization (A–A″, B–B″) Two individualizing sperm-tail bundles stained for DNA (green) and actin (purple). EndoG MB07150/+ (A–A″) and EndoG MB07150/Df (B–B″) bundles imaged ahead of the cystic bulge (A″ and B″), at the cystic bulge (A′ and B′), and behind the cystic bulge (A and B). Arrowheads indicate examples of mtDNA nucleoids. Scale bars are 10 μm. (C) Number of nucleoids in cystic bulges at different stages of individualization in bundles from control and EndoG mutants. (D) Focal section through a wild-type cystic bulge stained for mitochondria (DJ-GFP: red) and actin (purple). (E) Schematic showing early mtDNA elimination in wild-type and late mtDNA elimination in EndoG mutant spermatids; DNA (green), mitochondria (red), and investment cones (purple). Developmental Cell 2012 22, 660-668DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.021) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions