Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
What is the optimal sequence of therapies for stage II-III adenocarcinoma of the proximal stomach? - Chemoradiation followed by surgery Bruce Minsky.
Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
ANDREW NG PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL Role of primary chemoradiation in esophageal carcinoma.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 1 Discussion Panel on Primary Radiochemotherapy Volker Budach, MD, PhD Head Department for Radiation Oncology Charité.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Mary McCormack & Jonathan Ledermann NCRI Gynae Clinical Studies Group.
AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4)
DAHANCA 16 Planned post-radiation neck dissection vs salvage neck dissection in patients with N2-3 SCC of the head and neck treated with primary radiotherapy.
Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell carcinoma.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
Post-Resection CA 19-9 Predicts Overall Survival in Patients Treated with Adjuvant Chemoradiation; RTOG 9704 A. Berger, K. Winter, J. Hoffman, W. Regine,
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
INT Translational research in head and neck cancer: preoperative chemotherapy in oral cavity cancer based on disease molecular profiling. Paolo Bossi MSO.
ACRIN 6685 Overview ACRIN 6685 A Multi-center Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head.
Background  Reports of long-term survivors (≥5 years) of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) have focused mainly on HRQL or GI symptoms  Only.
Methods Patients: Unresectable GBM PS 0-2, MMS≥25 Centralized radiological Review RANO criteria Centralized pathological Review: MGMT tissue & MGMT serum.
Delivering clinical research to make patients, and the NHS, better OG neoadjuvant therapy Brachytherapy Stephen Falk dd/mm/yyyy.
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin versus 5-FU alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: First results.
Rectal Cancer: French Prodige Study: Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
Preoperative fluorouracil (FU)-based chemoradiation +/- weekly oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathologic response analysis of the STAR.
Effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival of patients with resectable esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer: Results from.
CJ Allegra, G Yothers, MJ O’Connell, MS Roh, RW Beart, NJ Petrelli, S Lopa, S Sharif, and N Wolmark Neoadjuvant Therapy For Rectal Cancer: Mature Results.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
Lapatinib versus Trastuzumab in Combination with Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Analysis of the GEPARQUINTO.
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group PreOperative Chemotherapy or Radiochemotherapy in Esophago- gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Final results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative 5-fluorouracil (F)/cisplatin (P) to surgery alone in adenocarcinoma of the stomach and lower.
Therapeutic Delay and Survival after Surgery for Cancer of the Pancreatic Head with or without Preoperative Biliary Drainage Eshuis, van der Gaag, Rauws.
Poster # 18, abstract # 4530 Long term results of a phase III study investigating chemoradiation with and without surgery in locally advanced squamous.
Preliminary Results of the MRC CR07 / NCIC CO16 Randomized Trial Short course pre-op vs selective post-op chemo-RT for rectal cancer Local Recurrence after.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
R3 이운주/Prof 맹치훈. Introduction Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is most lethal cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Relapsed occurs in 80-85%
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA- Summarised
Results of Definitive Radiotherapy in Anal Canal Carcinoma
Definitive Analysis of the Primary Outcomes
Prognostic and Predictive Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Postmenopausal Women with Node-Positive, Estrogen- Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
Discussion Gastric Cancer LBA 4002, abstracts 4003, 4004
นายแพทย์ธราธร ตุงคะสมิต นายแพทย์ชำนาญการพิเศษ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งอุดรธานี
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
A U.S. GI INTERGROUP TRIAL
Institute of Oncology “Ion Chiricuță”, Cluj, Romania
Final results of the phase III, randomised, double-blind AVOREN trial of first-line bevacizumab + interferon-a2a in metastatic renal cell carcinoma Escudier.
Assessed for eligibility (N = )
What is the most appropriate therapy for a 50 year old patient with T3N+ rectal cancer and isolated resectable liver metastases?
Systemic chemotherapy->chemoradiation->surgery.
What is the optimal pre-op therapy for esophagus and GE junction cancers?
CK RS for non-resectable pancreatic tumors
Oesophageal and Gastric cancer: neo-adjuvant therapy
Adjuvant Radiation is Required for Gastric Cancer
ACT II: The Second UK Phase III Anal Cancer Trial
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Do all patients with T2-3 mid-high rectal adenocarcinomas require RT as part of their neoadjuvant therapy? - Yes - 
 Bruce Minsky.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS)
RTOG 9704: A Phase III Study of Adjuvant Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Gemcitabine for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma A U.S. GI INTERGROUP.
Figure A (online only) Flow diagram showing case recruitment, participation and follow up to the three year interview for the Prostate Cancer Care and.
Prognosis of Patients With Pathologic T0 N+ Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Chemoradiotherapy and Surgical Resection: Results From a Nationwide.
Kantarjian HM et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 635.
Presentation transcript:

Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group Abstract No 4530, Poster No 18 Long term results of a phase III study investigating chemoradiation with and without surgery in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group

Participating Centers German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group Essen (KEM, AKK, University, EKK) Düsseldorf (University) Tübingen (University) Marburg (University) Duisburg (St.J., Städt.) Trier (KB) Berlin (RRK) Göttingen (University) Mönchengladbach (Franz.)

Eligibility Criteria SCC of the intrathoracic esophagus Stage T3-4 N0-1 M0 according to CT und EUS Medically fit for surgery, PS 0-1 Age up to 70 years Written informed consent

Flow Diagram of Patients included Excluded (not meeting inclusion criteria) n = 5 Assessed for eligibility n = 189 Refused randomisation n = 12 Treated A n = 7 Treated B n = 5 Randomised n = 172 Allocated to Arm A n = 86 Allocated to Arm B n = 86 Stahl M, et al JCO 23:2310-7, 2005 Treated n = 86 Treated n = 85

Stratification Criteria Center Gender Weight loss (up to vs. above 10% of BW) Complete EUS Stage (T3N0 vs. T3N+ vs. T4)

Endpoints Primary endpoint Overall survival Secondary endpoints POET GOeCSG Primary endpoint Overall survival Secondary endpoints Rate of R0-Resection Rate of PCR Postoperative Mortality Local tumor control

Statistical design Test for equivalence between arms Id<15%I - H0: 35% 2y-survival in Arm A; >20% Arm B N= 175 , power of 80%, a=0.05

Results at Surgery Surgery 62 patients Resection 55 / 62 (89%) ypT0 N0 M0 18 / 51 (35%) ypT1-3 N0 M0 17 / 51 (33%) ypT1-3 N1 M0 9 / 51 (18%) ypT1-3 N0-1 M1 7 / 51 (14%)

Surgical Procedures Exploration 7 /62 Resection 55/62 (89%) TTE 49/55 (89%) THE 4/55 Other 1/55 Unknown 1/55

Treatment Related Mortality CTX CRTX Surgery Arm A 2/86(2.2%) 0 7/57(12.3%) Arm B 2/85(2.3%) 0 0/5 all 4/171(2.3%) 0 7/62(11.3%) Overall 8.2%, including 3 pts. with late toxicity

Patterns of Failure (treatment according to protocol) Arm A* Arm B* Any failure 31/56 (55%) 57/83 (69%) Local+regional 14/31 (45%) 41/57 (72%) Distant (only) 16/31 (52%) 14/57 (25%) Unknown 1/31 ( 3%) 2/57 ( 3%) * Arm A: CRTX (at least 36 Gy) + Resection, Arm B: CRTX (at least 59 Gy)

Overall Survival (JCO 2005) Log-rank for equivalence p = 0.04 2-YSR 38.8% vs. 35.4%

Overall Survival (December 2007) 5-YSR 27.9% vs. 17.0% Calculated 10-YSR 19.2% vs 12.2% Logrank p=0.36 HR 1.15 (0.82-1.61) CRTX with Surgery CRTX alone

Survival as treated (no crossover) 5-YSR 28.0% vs. 17.0% Calculated 10-YSR 19.8% vs 12.9% Logrank p=0.48 HR 1.13 (0.79-1.61)

Cox Regression Analysis Progn. Factor HR (95%CI) p-value CTX-Response (y/n) 0.30 0.19-0.48 <0.0001 Treatment group (A/B) 1.19 0.80-1.76 0.39 Gender (m/f) 1.06 0.65-1.73 0.82 EUS complete (y/n) 0.91 0.61-1.35 0.64 Weight loss (</>10%) 1.19 0.76-1.85 0.45 Stage (T3N1/T3N0) 1.02 0.61-1.70 0.94 Stage (T4NX/T3N0) 1.01 0.52-1.97 0.97