Initial and 3-year results after subintimal versus intraluminal approach for long femoropopliteal occlusion treated with a self-expandable nitinol stent Yoshimitsu Soga, MD, Osamu Iida, MD, Kenji Suzuki, MD, Keisuke Hirano, MD, Daizo Kawasaki, MD, Yoshiaki Shintani, MD, Nobuhiro Suematsu, MD, Terutoshi Yamaoka, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 1547-1555 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.107 Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Participant flow. IVUS, Intravascular ultrasound; US, ultrasound. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1547-1555DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.107) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Primary patency after femoropopliteal stenting in patients who received intraluminal or subintimal approach. A, Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. B, As-treated (AS) analysis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1547-1555DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.107) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Assisted-primary patency: A, Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; B, As-treated (AS) analysis. Secondary patency: C, ITT analysis; D, AS analysis. Overall survival: E, ITT analysis; F, AS analysis. Limb salvage rate: G, ITT analysis; H, AS analysis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1547-1555DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.107) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Limb salvage rate in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). A, Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. B, As-treated (AS) analysis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1547-1555DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.107) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions